On 01/03/2017 02:58 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Monday 02 January 2017 01:34 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Saturday 31 December 2016 06:22 AM, David Lechner wrote:
On 08/10/2016 06:00 AM, Karl Beldan wrote:
Many davinci boards (da830 and da850 families) don't have their clocks
in DT yet and won't
On 01/03/2017 02:58 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Monday 02 January 2017 01:34 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Saturday 31 December 2016 06:22 AM, David Lechner wrote:
On 08/10/2016 06:00 AM, Karl Beldan wrote:
Many davinci boards (da830 and da850 families) don't have their clocks
in DT yet and won't
On Monday 02 January 2017 01:34 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Saturday 31 December 2016 06:22 AM, David Lechner wrote:
>> On 08/10/2016 06:00 AM, Karl Beldan wrote:
>>> Many davinci boards (da830 and da850 families) don't have their clocks
>>> in DT yet and won't be successful in getting an unnamed
On Monday 02 January 2017 01:34 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Saturday 31 December 2016 06:22 AM, David Lechner wrote:
>> On 08/10/2016 06:00 AM, Karl Beldan wrote:
>>> Many davinci boards (da830 and da850 families) don't have their clocks
>>> in DT yet and won't be successful in getting an unnamed
On Saturday 31 December 2016 06:22 AM, David Lechner wrote:
> On 08/10/2016 06:00 AM, Karl Beldan wrote:
>> Many davinci boards (da830 and da850 families) don't have their clocks
>> in DT yet and won't be successful in getting an unnamed aemif clock
>> without explicitly registering them via
On Saturday 31 December 2016 06:22 AM, David Lechner wrote:
> On 08/10/2016 06:00 AM, Karl Beldan wrote:
>> Many davinci boards (da830 and da850 families) don't have their clocks
>> in DT yet and won't be successful in getting an unnamed aemif clock
>> without explicitly registering them via
On 08/10/2016 06:00 AM, Karl Beldan wrote:
Many davinci boards (da830 and da850 families) don't have their clocks
in DT yet and won't be successful in getting an unnamed aemif clock
without explicitly registering them via clk_lookups, failing the
ti-aemif memory driver probe.
The current aemif
On 08/10/2016 06:00 AM, Karl Beldan wrote:
Many davinci boards (da830 and da850 families) don't have their clocks
in DT yet and won't be successful in getting an unnamed aemif clock
without explicitly registering them via clk_lookups, failing the
ti-aemif memory driver probe.
The current aemif
Many davinci boards (da830 and da850 families) don't have their clocks
in DT yet and won't be successful in getting an unnamed aemif clock
without explicitly registering them via clk_lookups, failing the
ti-aemif memory driver probe.
The current aemif lookup entry resolving to the same clock:
Many davinci boards (da830 and da850 families) don't have their clocks
in DT yet and won't be successful in getting an unnamed aemif clock
without explicitly registering them via clk_lookups, failing the
ti-aemif memory driver probe.
The current aemif lookup entry resolving to the same clock:
10 matches
Mail list logo
