Hi Joe,
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 09:54:27PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 12:45 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 08:54:04PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 11:30 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > > In long run I'd like to disable
> > >
Hi Joe,
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 09:54:27PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 12:45 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 08:54:04PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 11:30 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
In long run I'd like to disable
the check
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 12:47:47PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > > TRAILING_STATEMENTS
> > >
> > > False positives? Got an example?
> >
> > tree: git://git.freedesktop.org/git/nouveau/linux-2.6 drm-nouveau-next
> > head: d2989b534ef6834ebf2425aecc040b894b567c91
> > commit:
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 12:45 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 08:54:04PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 11:30 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > In long run I'd like to disable
> > > the check types that tend to have false positives. As for now, these
> > >
> > > TRAILING_STATEMENTS
> >
> > False positives? Got an example?
>
> tree: git://git.freedesktop.org/git/nouveau/linux-2.6 drm-nouveau-next
> head: d2989b534ef6834ebf2425aecc040b894b567c91
> commit: 01672ef454307bf63e93defb3599399b678ff58b [3/68] drm/nve0/fifo: copy
> engine context
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 08:54:04PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 11:30 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > In long run I'd like to disable
> > the check types that tend to have false positives. As for now, these
> > checks are disabled in my checkpatch robot:
>
> Are you using a
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 11:30 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> In long run I'd like to disable
> the check types that tend to have false positives. As for now, these
> checks are disabled in my checkpatch robot:
Are you using a .checkpatch.conf file?
> PATCH_PREFIX
> LONG_LINE
> CAMELCASE
That's a
Hi Eric,
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 10:14:09PM -0500, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> I've fixed this in my for-next branch, Linus rejected my pull on other
> grounds so this should let us fix up these style issues before the merge.
> Thanks for catching this, I need to go back to running
>
Hi Eric,
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 10:14:09PM -0500, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
I've fixed this in my for-next branch, Linus rejected my pull on other
grounds so this should let us fix up these style issues before the merge.
Thanks for catching this, I need to go back to running
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 11:30 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
In long run I'd like to disable
the check types that tend to have false positives. As for now, these
checks are disabled in my checkpatch robot:
Are you using a .checkpatch.conf file?
PATCH_PREFIX
LONG_LINE
CAMELCASE
That's a
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 08:54:04PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 11:30 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
In long run I'd like to disable
the check types that tend to have false positives. As for now, these
checks are disabled in my checkpatch robot:
Are you using a
TRAILING_STATEMENTS
False positives? Got an example?
tree: git://git.freedesktop.org/git/nouveau/linux-2.6 drm-nouveau-next
head: d2989b534ef6834ebf2425aecc040b894b567c91
commit: 01672ef454307bf63e93defb3599399b678ff58b [3/68] drm/nve0/fifo: copy
engine context stored in ramfc,
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 12:45 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 08:54:04PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 11:30 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
In long run I'd like to disable
the check types that tend to have false positives. As for now, these
checks are
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 12:47:47PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
TRAILING_STATEMENTS
False positives? Got an example?
tree: git://git.freedesktop.org/git/nouveau/linux-2.6 drm-nouveau-next
head: d2989b534ef6834ebf2425aecc040b894b567c91
commit:
14 matches
Mail list logo