On Wednesday 16 January 2008 18:46:03 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 January 2008 12:51:35 am Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Saturday 12 January 2008 11:13:35 pm Rene Herman wrote:
> > > > ... And, now that I have your attention, while it's
> >
On 16-01-08 18:46, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 12:51:35 am Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
Ok, something to explain. These flags exists to allow drivers to
manually configure (override) PnP resources at init time - we know - for
example in ALSA - that some combinations simply
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 12:51:35 am Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Saturday 12 January 2008 11:13:35 pm Rene Herman wrote:
> > > ... And, now that I have your attention, while it's
> > > not important to the issue anymore with the tests removed as the
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 12:51:35 am Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Saturday 12 January 2008 11:13:35 pm Rene Herman wrote:
... And, now that I have your attention, while it's
not important to the issue anymore with the tests removed as the
On 16-01-08 18:46, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 12:51:35 am Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
Ok, something to explain. These flags exists to allow drivers to
manually configure (override) PnP resources at init time - we know - for
example in ALSA - that some combinations simply
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 18:46:03 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 12:51:35 am Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Saturday 12 January 2008 11:13:35 pm Rene Herman wrote:
... And, now that I have your attention, while it's
not
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Saturday 12 January 2008 11:13:35 pm Rene Herman wrote:
> > ... And, now that I have your attention, while it's
> > not important to the issue anymore with the tests removed as the submitted
> > patch did, do you have an opinion on
On 14-01-08 23:26, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Saturday 12 January 2008 11:13:35 pm Rene Herman wrote:
I find DISABLE including DO_NOT_CHANGE rather unexpected...
I don't know the history of those flags, but I wish they didn't exist.
They really look like warts in the PNP core code. They're
On Saturday 12 January 2008 11:13:35 pm Rene Herman wrote:
> ... And, now that I have your attention, while it's
> not important to the issue anymore with the tests removed as the submitted
> patch did, do you have an opinion on (include/linux/pnp.h):
>
> /* pnp driver flags */
> #define
On Saturday 12 January 2008 11:13:35 pm Rene Herman wrote:
... And, now that I have your attention, while it's
not important to the issue anymore with the tests removed as the submitted
patch did, do you have an opinion on (include/linux/pnp.h):
/* pnp driver flags */
#define
On 14-01-08 23:26, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Saturday 12 January 2008 11:13:35 pm Rene Herman wrote:
I find DISABLE including DO_NOT_CHANGE rather unexpected...
I don't know the history of those flags, but I wish they didn't exist.
They really look like warts in the PNP core code. They're
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Saturday 12 January 2008 11:13:35 pm Rene Herman wrote:
... And, now that I have your attention, while it's
not important to the issue anymore with the tests removed as the submitted
patch did, do you have an opinion on (include/linux/pnp.h):
On 13-01-08 06:50, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Saturday 12 January 2008 1:08:01 pm Rene Herman wrote:
pnp-do-not-stop-start-devices-in-suspend-resume-path.patch in current -mm
breaks resuming isapnp cards from hibernation. They need the pnp_start_dev
to enable the device again after hibernation.
On Saturday 12 January 2008 1:08:01 pm Rene Herman wrote:
> pnp-do-not-stop-start-devices-in-suspend-resume-path.patch in current -mm
> breaks resuming isapnp cards from hibernation. They need the pnp_start_dev
> to enable the device again after hibernation.
>
> They don't really need the
Hi Andrew.
pnp-do-not-stop-start-devices-in-suspend-resume-path.patch in current -mm
breaks resuming isapnp cards from hibernation. They need the pnp_start_dev
to enable the device again after hibernation.
They don't really need the pnp_stop_dev() which the above mentioned patch
also
Hi Andrew.
pnp-do-not-stop-start-devices-in-suspend-resume-path.patch in current -mm
breaks resuming isapnp cards from hibernation. They need the pnp_start_dev
to enable the device again after hibernation.
They don't really need the pnp_stop_dev() which the above mentioned patch
also
On Saturday 12 January 2008 1:08:01 pm Rene Herman wrote:
pnp-do-not-stop-start-devices-in-suspend-resume-path.patch in current -mm
breaks resuming isapnp cards from hibernation. They need the pnp_start_dev
to enable the device again after hibernation.
They don't really need the
On 13-01-08 06:50, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Saturday 12 January 2008 1:08:01 pm Rene Herman wrote:
pnp-do-not-stop-start-devices-in-suspend-resume-path.patch in current -mm
breaks resuming isapnp cards from hibernation. They need the pnp_start_dev
to enable the device again after hibernation.
18 matches
Mail list logo
