Hello,
I now could compile the amd64-kernel successfully. I installed it on my
machine, rebooted and in the beginning everything seemed fine. But after
mounting the root (ext 3) filesystem (or before mounting, I do not know
exactly) the machine hangs. The last message I see is:
Mounting root
Hello,
I now could compile the amd64-kernel successfully. I installed it on my
machine, rebooted and in the beginning everything seemed fine. But after
mounting the root (ext 3) filesystem (or before mounting, I do not know
exactly) the machine hangs. The last message I see is:
Mounting root
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 01:37:46PM +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> Hello,
>
...
> I am also using Debian sarge. I extracted the tarfile to /usr/local/bin
> end executed "kmake menuconfig". Everything seemed fine so far. But a
> few seconds after starting the compilation (kmake bzImage) I got
* Jakob Oestergaard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This is really the clever way to run a 64-bit system - 99% of what is
> commonly run on most systems only gains overhead from the 64-bit address
> space - tools like postfix, cron, syslog, apache, ... will not gain from
> being native 64-bit.
For
Hello,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:39:55 +0200
Jakob Oestergaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1. Is it possible to compile a 64-bit kernel on a 32-bit machine (or
> > at least on a 64-bit machine with 32-bit software) and if yes, how
> > can I do that?
>
> Yes. On Debian Sarge, I have a few
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 11:31:38AM +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> Hello,
...
> > There is no highmem option for the 64-bit kernel, because it doesn't
> > need one.
>
> I have two questions:
>
> 1. Is it possible to compile a 64-bit kernel on a 32-bit machine (or at
> least on a 64-bit machine
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 11:31 +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
[...]
> 2. All other software on the machine is 32-bit software. Will that
> software work with a 64-bit kernel?
Basically yes.
E.g. open-office does not exist natively for 64bit architectures ATM (at
least not on x86-compatibles).
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 11:31 +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
[...]
> 2. All other software on the machine is 32-bit software. Will that
> software work with a 64-bit kernel?
Basically yes.
E.g. open-office does not exist natively for 64bit architectuires ATM.
Bernd
--
Firmix Software
Hello,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 05:05:40 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christoph Pleger wrote:
> > At last I found out that setting HIGHMEM support to 64 GB is the
> > problem. But is it really not possible to use more than 4GB on an
> > Opteron machine?
>
> Build and boot a 64-bit
Christoph Pleger wrote:
At last I found out that setting HIGHMEM support to 64 GB is the
problem. But is it really not possible to use more than 4GB on an
Opteron machine?
Build and boot a 64-bit kernel, not a 32-bit kernel.
There is no highmem option for the 64-bit kernel, because it doesn't
Hello,
I had a working kernel configuration for an Opteron machine. Since that
configuration was supposed to support many kinds of hardware, it
contained many settings that were not optimal for an Opteron machine. So
I created a new configuration especially for that machine. But the
resulting
Hello,
I had a working kernel configuration for an Opteron machine. Since that
configuration was supposed to support many kinds of hardware, it
contained many settings that were not optimal for an Opteron machine. So
I created a new configuration especially for that machine. But the
resulting
Christoph Pleger wrote:
At last I found out that setting HIGHMEM support to 64 GB is the
problem. But is it really not possible to use more than 4GB on an
Opteron machine?
Build and boot a 64-bit kernel, not a 32-bit kernel.
There is no highmem option for the 64-bit kernel, because it doesn't
Hello,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 05:05:40 -0400
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Pleger wrote:
At last I found out that setting HIGHMEM support to 64 GB is the
problem. But is it really not possible to use more than 4GB on an
Opteron machine?
Build and boot a 64-bit kernel, not
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 11:31 +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
[...]
2. All other software on the machine is 32-bit software. Will that
software work with a 64-bit kernel?
Basically yes.
E.g. open-office does not exist natively for 64bit architectuires ATM.
Bernd
--
Firmix Software GmbH
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 11:31 +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
[...]
2. All other software on the machine is 32-bit software. Will that
software work with a 64-bit kernel?
Basically yes.
E.g. open-office does not exist natively for 64bit architectures ATM (at
least not on x86-compatibles).
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 11:31:38AM +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
Hello,
...
There is no highmem option for the 64-bit kernel, because it doesn't
need one.
I have two questions:
1. Is it possible to compile a 64-bit kernel on a 32-bit machine (or at
least on a 64-bit machine with
Hello,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:39:55 +0200
Jakob Oestergaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Is it possible to compile a 64-bit kernel on a 32-bit machine (or
at least on a 64-bit machine with 32-bit software) and if yes, how
can I do that?
Yes. On Debian Sarge, I have a few wrapper scripts
* Jakob Oestergaard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This is really the clever way to run a 64-bit system - 99% of what is
commonly run on most systems only gains overhead from the 64-bit address
space - tools like postfix, cron, syslog, apache, ... will not gain from
being native 64-bit.
For most
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 01:37:46PM +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
Hello,
...
I am also using Debian sarge. I extracted the tarfile to /usr/local/bin
end executed kmake menuconfig. Everything seemed fine so far. But a
few seconds after starting the compilation (kmake bzImage) I got this
20 matches
Mail list logo
