On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 22:54:22 +1100 (EST),
Neale Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If this is a correct and justifiable fix for 2.2 then in 2.4 should
>dmi_scan.o be included in export-objs? Or is there a "better" way of
>doing this?
It should already be correct in 2.4. In 2.2 the OX_OBJS list
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
> >If this implies that apm is initialised *before* the dmi_scan then there
> >is potentially a problem with buggy BIOSen that oops instead of reporting
> >power status
>
> This should fix the link order, at the (small) expense of compiling
> dmi_scan for
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:47:02 +1100 (EST),
Neale Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Looking more closely at a 2.2.18 bootup tonight I see that apm stuff
>appears in dmesg before dmi_scan does (I added "#define DUMP_DMI" in
>dmi_scan.c).
>
>If this implies that apm is initialised *before* the dmi_sc
Hi Stephen,
Looking more closely at a 2.2.18 bootup tonight I see that apm stuff
appears in dmesg before dmi_scan does (I added "#define DUMP_DMI" in
dmi_scan.c).
If this implies that apm is initialised *before* the dmi_scan then there
is potentially a problem with buggy BIOSen that oops instead
4 matches
Mail list logo