Re: 2.4.0 vm BUG (ksymoopsed)

2001-01-10 Thread David Ford
Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > kernel BUG at vmscan.c:452! > > invalid operand: > > Does reiserfs patch changes vmscan.c ? > > If so, whats in line 452 of mm/vmscan.c of 2.4.0 reiserfs tree? reiserfs doesn't touch mm/vmscan.c. the line is: del_page_from_inactive_clean_list(page); -d > -- -

Re: 2.4.0 vm BUG (ksymoopsed)

2001-01-10 Thread Ulrich Schwarz
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 09:21:57PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: >> kernel BUG at vmscan.c:452! >> invalid operand: > Does reiserfs patch changes vmscan.c ? No, it doesn't. It's strange that the console reported vmscan.c:452 whilst kern.log reports page_alloc.c:74 So long. Ulrich - To u

Re: 2.4.0 vm BUG (ksymoopsed)

2001-01-10 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Ulrich Schwarz wrote: > 2.4.0 (final i586) patched with reiserfs 3.6.25 produced the following BUG: > > > the console report (ksymoopsed): > > kernel BUG at vmscan.c:452! > invalid operand: Does reiserfs patch changes vmscan.c ? If so, whats in line 452 of mm/vmsca

Re: 2.4.0 vm BUG (ksymoopsed)

2001-01-10 Thread Ulrich Schwarz
2.4.0 (final i586) patched with reiserfs 3.6.25 produced the following BUG: the console report (ksymoopsed): kernel BUG at vmscan.c:452! invalid operand: CPU:0 EIP:0010:[] Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386 EFLAGS: 00010282 eax: 001c ebx: c101322c ecx: c0274