Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-27 Thread Richard Henderson
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 07:54:17PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > FWIW the documentation seems to imply that the option is necessary only > when directly booting from SRM, i.e.. no bootloader is involved at all. Err, well, you can't have _no_ bootloader. > It uses the example of MILO's presence

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-27 Thread Jeff Garzik
Richard Henderson wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 06:48:30PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > When built with CONFIG_ALPHA_NAUTILUS, my UP1000's IDE totally fails. > > Mine doesn't. > > > I am booting w/ aboot 0.7a from SRM, -without- the > > srm-as-bootloader kernel config option. > > That is

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-27 Thread Richard Henderson
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 06:48:30PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > When built with CONFIG_ALPHA_NAUTILUS, my UP1000's IDE totally fails. Mine doesn't. > I am booting w/ aboot 0.7a from SRM, -without- the > srm-as-bootloader kernel config option. That is the error. r~ - To unsubscribe from this

Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-27 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
From: "Andrea Arcangeli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:41:23PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:49:24AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > caused me to write the posted patch to get all compilations right. > > > > The reason I needed that patch is

Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-27 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:41:23PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:49:24AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > caused me to write the posted patch to get all compilations right. > > The reason I needed that patch is that I was not using 2.4.5aa1 but a > corrupted tree

Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-27 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:41:23PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:49:24AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: caused me to write the posted patch to get all compilations right. The reason I needed that patch is that I was not using 2.4.5aa1 but a corrupted tree (I'm

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-27 Thread Richard Henderson
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 07:54:17PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: FWIW the documentation seems to imply that the option is necessary only when directly booting from SRM, i.e.. no bootloader is involved at all. Err, well, you can't have _no_ bootloader. It uses the example of MILO's presence or

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-27 Thread Richard Henderson
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 06:48:30PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: When built with CONFIG_ALPHA_NAUTILUS, my UP1000's IDE totally fails. Mine doesn't. I am booting w/ aboot 0.7a from SRM, -without- the srm-as-bootloader kernel config option. That is the error. r~ - To unsubscribe from this

Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-27 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
From: Andrea Arcangeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:41:23PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:49:24AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: caused me to write the posted patch to get all compilations right. The reason I needed that patch is that I was

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-27 Thread Jeff Garzik
Richard Henderson wrote: On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 06:48:30PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: When built with CONFIG_ALPHA_NAUTILUS, my UP1000's IDE totally fails. Mine doesn't. I am booting w/ aboot 0.7a from SRM, -without- the srm-as-bootloader kernel config option. That is the error.

Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-26 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 09:02:21PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > diff -urN alpha/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c alpha-1/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c > > --- alpha/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c Sun Apr 1 01:17:07 2001 > > +++ alpha-1/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c

Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > diff -urN alpha/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c alpha-1/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c > --- alpha/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c Sun Apr 1 01:17:07 2001 > +++ alpha-1/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c Wed May 23 02:43:49 2001 > @@ -16,15 +16,18 @@ > #include >

Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-26 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 07:36:49PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I got exactly the above when compiling for dp264 so I sent to Linus a > patch to fix those compile problems, now I suspect my fix broke the > generic compile :(, I will check that. 2.4.5aa1 compiles fine, but 2.4.5 doesn't,

[PATCH] Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
"Ingo T. Storm" wrote: > I just tried to compile 2.4.5 on a Ruffian. With CPU selection "generic" it > fails when linking the kernel (see below). With CPU=Ruffian, it compiles and > links fine. Haven't tried booting yet, 'cause the machine is some 20 miles > away from here. > ld -r -o kernel.o

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
It should note, though, that -not- using CONFIG_ALPHA_GENERIC seems to have a detrimental effect on my machines, in 2.4.5 vanilla. When built with CONFIG_ALPHA_NAUTILUS, my UP1000's IDE totally fails. It probes the drives ok, on boot, but a logic hang occurs where no more boot progress can be

Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-26 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 05:20:29PM +0200, Ingo T. Storm wrote: > sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_inb': > sys_dp264.c(.text+0x440): multiple definition of `tsunami_inb' > core_tsunami.o(.text+0x500):core_tsunami.c: first defined here > sys_dp264.o: In function `clipper_map_irq': >

2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-26 Thread Ingo T. Storm
Hi, I just tried to compile 2.4.5 on a Ruffian. With CPU selection "generic" it fails when linking the kernel (see below). With CPU=Ruffian, it compiles and links fine. Haven't tried booting yet, 'cause the machine is some 20 miles away from here. What more can I provide/do to help? Cheers,

2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-26 Thread Ingo T. Storm
Hi, I just tried to compile 2.4.5 on a Ruffian. With CPU selection generic it fails when linking the kernel (see below). With CPU=Ruffian, it compiles and links fine. Haven't tried booting yet, 'cause the machine is some 20 miles away from here. What more can I provide/do to help? Cheers, Ingo

Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-26 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 05:20:29PM +0200, Ingo T. Storm wrote: sys_dp264.o: In function `tsunami_inb': sys_dp264.c(.text+0x440): multiple definition of `tsunami_inb' core_tsunami.o(.text+0x500):core_tsunami.c: first defined here sys_dp264.o: In function `clipper_map_irq':

Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-26 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 07:36:49PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: I got exactly the above when compiling for dp264 so I sent to Linus a patch to fix those compile problems, now I suspect my fix broke the generic compile :(, I will check that. 2.4.5aa1 compiles fine, but 2.4.5 doesn't, don't

Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
Andrea Arcangeli wrote: diff -urN alpha/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c alpha-1/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c --- alpha/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c Sun Apr 1 01:17:07 2001 +++ alpha-1/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c Wed May 23 02:43:49 2001 @@ -16,15 +16,18 @@ #include linux/pci.h

Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-26 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 09:02:21PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: Andrea Arcangeli wrote: diff -urN alpha/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c alpha-1/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c --- alpha/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c Sun Apr 1 01:17:07 2001 +++ alpha-1/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c Wed May

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
It should note, though, that -not- using CONFIG_ALPHA_GENERIC seems to have a detrimental effect on my machines, in 2.4.5 vanilla. When built with CONFIG_ALPHA_NAUTILUS, my UP1000's IDE totally fails. It probes the drives ok, on boot, but a logic hang occurs where no more boot progress can be

[PATCH] Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
Ingo T. Storm wrote: I just tried to compile 2.4.5 on a Ruffian. With CPU selection generic it fails when linking the kernel (see below). With CPU=Ruffian, it compiles and links fine. Haven't tried booting yet, 'cause the machine is some 20 miles away from here. ld -r -o kernel.o entry.o