Re: 2.4.x APM interferes with FA311TX/natsemi.o

2001-05-04 Thread Paul Komarek

On Tue, 1 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

> > When the call
> >   apm_bios_call_simple(APM_FUNC_SET_STATE, 0x100, APM_STATE_READY, )
> > is made, the PMEEN (PME enable) bit in the CCSR register on my FA311
> > mysteriously changes from 0 to 1, causing the card to stop processing
> 
> The Linux driver set the power management of the card off. The BIOS then 
> rudely fiddled with it. If its not a laptop seriously consider just turning
> off APM support. The Linux idle loop halts will do a fair job of power
> saving anyway

Thanks to everyone that has helped me with this problem (Netgear FA311
dies when apm.c's set_power_state() is called to unblank screen, for
instance when an X server exits or the monitor is awakened from
APM-induced sleep).  Since everyone has suggested work arounds, I'm going
to assume it isn't worthwhile digging any deeper for causes.

I've sent a two-line patch for the natsemi.c driver to the mainainers,
which simply re-disables power management before checking if there are any
packets to process in the receive buffer.  Turning off the APM screen
blanking option in the kernel also works.  My patch isn't in the 2.4.4
kernel -- perhaps the maintainers have a better idea than my hack, or are
hoping to find one =-) -- but if anybody wants this patch, my email
address should be valid at least until the 2.6.x kernels.

-Paul Komarek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: 2.4.x APM interferes with FA311TX/natsemi.o

2001-05-04 Thread Paul Komarek

On Tue, 1 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

  When the call
apm_bios_call_simple(APM_FUNC_SET_STATE, 0x100, APM_STATE_READY, eax)
  is made, the PMEEN (PME enable) bit in the CCSR register on my FA311
  mysteriously changes from 0 to 1, causing the card to stop processing
 
 The Linux driver set the power management of the card off. The BIOS then 
 rudely fiddled with it. If its not a laptop seriously consider just turning
 off APM support. The Linux idle loop halts will do a fair job of power
 saving anyway

Thanks to everyone that has helped me with this problem (Netgear FA311
dies when apm.c's set_power_state() is called to unblank screen, for
instance when an X server exits or the monitor is awakened from
APM-induced sleep).  Since everyone has suggested work arounds, I'm going
to assume it isn't worthwhile digging any deeper for causes.

I've sent a two-line patch for the natsemi.c driver to the mainainers,
which simply re-disables power management before checking if there are any
packets to process in the receive buffer.  Turning off the APM screen
blanking option in the kernel also works.  My patch isn't in the 2.4.4
kernel -- perhaps the maintainers have a better idea than my hack, or are
hoping to find one =-) -- but if anybody wants this patch, my email
address should be valid at least until the 2.6.x kernels.

-Paul Komarek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: 2.4.x APM interferes with FA311TX/natsemi.o

2001-04-30 Thread Alan Cox

> When the call
>   apm_bios_call_simple(APM_FUNC_SET_STATE, 0x100, APM_STATE_READY, )
> is made, the PMEEN (PME enable) bit in the CCSR register on my FA311
> mysteriously changes from 0 to 1, causing the card to stop processing

The Linux driver set the power management of the card off. The BIOS then 
rudely fiddled with it. If its not a laptop seriously consider just turning
off APM support. The Linux idle loop halts will do a fair job of power
saving anyway
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: 2.4.x APM interferes with FA311TX/natsemi.o

2001-04-30 Thread Alan Cox

 When the call
   apm_bios_call_simple(APM_FUNC_SET_STATE, 0x100, APM_STATE_READY, eax)
 is made, the PMEEN (PME enable) bit in the CCSR register on my FA311
 mysteriously changes from 0 to 1, causing the card to stop processing

The Linux driver set the power management of the card off. The BIOS then 
rudely fiddled with it. If its not a laptop seriously consider just turning
off APM support. The Linux idle loop halts will do a fair job of power
saving anyway
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



2.4.x APM interferes with FA311TX/natsemi.o

2001-04-25 Thread Paul Komarek


SUMMARY:  the APM call
  apm_bios_call_simple(APM_FUNC_SET_STATE, 0x100, APM_STATE_READY, )
causes my Netgear FA311TX to enter a sleep mode.

DESCRIPTION:
I am having difficulties with the natsemi.o driver with a Netgear FA311TX.  
When the call
  apm_bios_call_simple(APM_FUNC_SET_STATE, 0x100, APM_STATE_READY, )
is made, the PMEEN (PME enable) bit in the CCSR register on my FA311
mysteriously changes from 0 to 1, causing the card to stop processing
received packets.  This APM call is made when unblanking the screen, for
instance when switching from KD_GRAPHICS to KD_TEXT with the KDSETMODE
ioctl on a virtual terminal.

I've modified this APM call to report the status of the PMEEN bit before
and after the short sequence of assembly statement in
apm_bios_call_simple() is executed.  I'm guessing there isn't any
interrupt activity between my "before" and "after" checks.  At least the
natsemi.o driver's interrupt handler isn't being called, but I can't vouch
for other interrupt handlers.

I'm more-or-less stuck for what to do next.  I'm a complete novice with
the kernel, the PCI bus, APM, or network cards, and this is my first
project.  I'd appreciate pointers for what to try next, since I've
received no responses from the driver maintainers Donald Becker, Tjeerd
Mulder, and Jeff Garzik yet.

Please cc me in any responses, as I'm not currently subscribed to the
kernel mailing list.  Thanks in advance.

-Paul Komarek





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



2.4.x APM interferes with FA311TX/natsemi.o

2001-04-25 Thread Paul Komarek


SUMMARY:  the APM call
  apm_bios_call_simple(APM_FUNC_SET_STATE, 0x100, APM_STATE_READY, eax)
causes my Netgear FA311TX to enter a sleep mode.

DESCRIPTION:
I am having difficulties with the natsemi.o driver with a Netgear FA311TX.  
When the call
  apm_bios_call_simple(APM_FUNC_SET_STATE, 0x100, APM_STATE_READY, eax)
is made, the PMEEN (PME enable) bit in the CCSR register on my FA311
mysteriously changes from 0 to 1, causing the card to stop processing
received packets.  This APM call is made when unblanking the screen, for
instance when switching from KD_GRAPHICS to KD_TEXT with the KDSETMODE
ioctl on a virtual terminal.

I've modified this APM call to report the status of the PMEEN bit before
and after the short sequence of assembly statement in
apm_bios_call_simple() is executed.  I'm guessing there isn't any
interrupt activity between my before and after checks.  At least the
natsemi.o driver's interrupt handler isn't being called, but I can't vouch
for other interrupt handlers.

I'm more-or-less stuck for what to do next.  I'm a complete novice with
the kernel, the PCI bus, APM, or network cards, and this is my first
project.  I'd appreciate pointers for what to try next, since I've
received no responses from the driver maintainers Donald Becker, Tjeerd
Mulder, and Jeff Garzik yet.

Please cc me in any responses, as I'm not currently subscribed to the
kernel mailing list.  Thanks in advance.

-Paul Komarek





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/