RE: 2.4.x and oops on 'mount -t smbfs'
Resolved! Running like a bought one now. Thanks Urban, you are so cool
that you should be in movies.
~NJ!~
> -Original Message-
> From: Urban Widmark [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 9:39 AM
> To: Jim Shaw
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 2.4.x and oops on 'mount -t smbfs'
>
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I've compiled a number of 2.4.1 and 2.4.0 kernels (actually supports the
> 4GB
> > RAM!!! Yay), and I have only one more problem to sort out. Under
> > 2.4.x, the mount completes successfully, but 'ls /net' causes an OOPS:
> .
>
> Try http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/smbfs-2.4.1-pre10-cache-2.patch
>
> Let me know if it works for you or not.
> (patch should be ok with 2.4.0 or 2.4.1)
>
> /Urban
JBWere Limited
DISCLAIMER
JBWere Limited and its related entities distributing this document and
each of their respective directors, officers and agents ("the Were Group")
believe that the information contained in this document is correct and that
any estimates, opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in this
document are reasonably held or made as at the time of compilation. However,
no warranty is made as to the accuracy or reliability of any estimates,
opinions, conclusions, recommendations (which may change without notice) or
other information contained in this document and, to the maximum extent
permitted by law, the Were Group disclaims all liability and responsibility
for any direct or indirect loss or damage which may be suffered by any recipient
through relying on anything contained in or omitted from this document.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.4.x and oops on 'mount -t smbfs'
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've compiled a number of 2.4.1 and 2.4.0 kernels (actually supports the 4GB > RAM!!! Yay), and I have only one more problem to sort out. Under > 2.4.x, the mount completes successfully, but 'ls /net' causes an OOPS: . Try http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/smbfs-2.4.1-pre10-cache-2.patch Let me know if it works for you or not. (patch should be ok with 2.4.0 or 2.4.1) /Urban - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.4.x and oops on 'mount -t smbfs'
> Any clues or similar experiences??? Known problem. There are some patches that seem to fix it so it should be fixed in the main 2.4 tree soon - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.4.x and oops on 'mount -t smbfs'
Any clues or similar experiences??? Known problem. There are some patches that seem to fix it so it should be fixed in the main 2.4 tree soon - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.4.x and oops on 'mount -t smbfs'
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've compiled a number of 2.4.1 and 2.4.0 kernels (actually supports the 4GB RAM!!! Yay), and I have only one more problem to sort out. Under 2.4.x, the mount completes successfully, but 'ls /net' causes an OOPS: . Try http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/smbfs-2.4.1-pre10-cache-2.patch Let me know if it works for you or not. (patch should be ok with 2.4.0 or 2.4.1) /Urban - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: 2.4.x and oops on 'mount -t smbfs'
Resolved! Running like a bought one now. Thanks Urban, you are so cool
that you should be in movies.
~NJ!~
-Original Message-
From: Urban Widmark [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 9:39 AM
To: Jim Shaw
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 2.4.x and oops on 'mount -t smbfs'
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've compiled a number of 2.4.1 and 2.4.0 kernels (actually supports the
4GB
RAM!!! Yay), and I have only one more problem to sort out. Under
2.4.x, the mount completes successfully, but 'ls /net' causes an OOPS:
.
Try http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/smbfs-2.4.1-pre10-cache-2.patch
Let me know if it works for you or not.
(patch should be ok with 2.4.0 or 2.4.1)
/Urban
JBWere Limited
DISCLAIMER
JBWere Limited and its related entities distributing this document and
each of their respective directors, officers and agents ("the Were Group")
believe that the information contained in this document is correct and that
any estimates, opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in this
document are reasonably held or made as at the time of compilation. However,
no warranty is made as to the accuracy or reliability of any estimates,
opinions, conclusions, recommendations (which may change without notice) or
other information contained in this document and, to the maximum extent
permitted by law, the Were Group disclaims all liability and responsibility
for any direct or indirect loss or damage which may be suffered by any recipient
through relying on anything contained in or omitted from this document.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
2.4.x and oops on 'mount -t smbfs'
Howdy,
I'm running RedHat 7.0 on a Compaq Proliant 5500, 4x Xeon 550MHz, 4GB 50Ns
EDO RAM. Under kernel 2.2.16-22 I'm able to use
'mount -t smbfs //ntserver/share /net -o
username=me,password=mine,workgroup=yours'
... without a problem. NT files become available under '/net', as expected.
I've compiled a number of 2.4.1 and 2.4.0 kernels (actually supports the 4GB
RAM!!! Yay), and I have only one more problem to sort out. Under
2.4.x, the mount completes successfully, but 'ls /net' causes an OOPS: .
I've compiled Samba support into the kernel, and the version of Samba utils
is 2.0.7-21ssl
Any clues or similar experiences???
Thanx,
Jim Shaw.
JBWere Limited
DISCLAIMER
JBWere Limited and its related entities distributing this document and
each of their respective directors, officers and agents ("the Were Group")
believe that the information contained in this document is correct and that
any estimates, opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in this
document are reasonably held or made as at the time of compilation. However,
no warranty is made as to the accuracy or reliability of any estimates,
opinions, conclusions, recommendations (which may change without notice) or
other information contained in this document and, to the maximum extent
permitted by law, the Were Group disclaims all liability and responsibility
for any direct or indirect loss or damage which may be suffered by any recipient
through relying on anything contained in or omitted from this document.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
2.4.x and oops on 'mount -t smbfs'
Howdy,
I'm running RedHat 7.0 on a Compaq Proliant 5500, 4x Xeon 550MHz, 4GB 50Ns
EDO RAM. Under kernel 2.2.16-22 I'm able to use
'mount -t smbfs //ntserver/share /net -o
username=me,password=mine,workgroup=yours'
... without a problem. NT files become available under '/net', as expected.
I've compiled a number of 2.4.1 and 2.4.0 kernels (actually supports the 4GB
RAM!!! Yay), and I have only one more problem to sort out. Under
2.4.x, the mount completes successfully, but 'ls /net' causes an OOPS: .
I've compiled Samba support into the kernel, and the version of Samba utils
is 2.0.7-21ssl
Any clues or similar experiences???
Thanx,
Jim Shaw.
JBWere Limited
DISCLAIMER
JBWere Limited and its related entities distributing this document and
each of their respective directors, officers and agents ("the Were Group")
believe that the information contained in this document is correct and that
any estimates, opinions, conclusions or recommendations contained in this
document are reasonably held or made as at the time of compilation. However,
no warranty is made as to the accuracy or reliability of any estimates,
opinions, conclusions, recommendations (which may change without notice) or
other information contained in this document and, to the maximum extent
permitted by law, the Were Group disclaims all liability and responsibility
for any direct or indirect loss or damage which may be suffered by any recipient
through relying on anything contained in or omitted from this document.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
