Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-25 Thread Bruno Ducrot
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 08:20:55PM -0500, Adam Belay wrote: > On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 19:32, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Adam Belay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 17:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-25 Thread Bruno Ducrot
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 08:20:55PM -0500, Adam Belay wrote: On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 19:32, Andrew Morton wrote: Adam Belay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 17:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Finally Centrino SpeedStep.

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-24 Thread Felix von Leitner
Thus spake Jeremy Fitzhardinge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Unfortunately, the Dothans *REQUIRE* some degree of ACPI support; the > speedfreq-centrino needs to extract a table from ACPI to know what are > valid operating (voltage/frequency) points to use for the CPU. The > patch you're using is

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-24 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Felix von Leitner wrote: >>ACPI is the preferred (and only standardized) method of controlling cpu >>throttling on x86 systems. >> >> > > 1. I don't trust ACPI > 2. my battery runs out quicker with ACPI compared to cpufreq > >I _really_ _really_ don't want ACPI. No, really not. This is no

[PATCH] [IPV6] Fix address/interface handling according to the scoping architecture (is Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10)

2005-03-24 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:33:08 -0800), Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Now about IPv6: npush and npoll are two applications I wrote. npush > > sends multicast announcements and opens a TCP socket.

[PATCH] [IPV6] Fix address/interface handling according to the scoping architecture (is Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10)

2005-03-24 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:33:08 -0800), Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] says: Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now about IPv6: npush and npoll are two applications I wrote. npush sends multicast announcements and opens a TCP socket. npoll receives

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-24 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Felix von Leitner wrote: ACPI is the preferred (and only standardized) method of controlling cpu throttling on x86 systems. 1. I don't trust ACPI 2. my battery runs out quicker with ACPI compared to cpufreq I _really_ _really_ don't want ACPI. No, really not. This is no idle

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-24 Thread Felix von Leitner
Thus spake Jeremy Fitzhardinge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Unfortunately, the Dothans *REQUIRE* some degree of ACPI support; the speedfreq-centrino needs to extract a table from ACPI to know what are valid operating (voltage/frequency) points to use for the CPU. The patch you're using is definitely

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-22 Thread Felix von Leitner
Thus spake Adam Belay ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > Why not use ACPI for CPU scaling? > > Felix, did you try this? > ACPI is the preferred (and only standardized) method of controlling cpu > throttling on x86 systems. 1. I don't trust ACPI 2. my battery runs out quicker with ACPI compared to

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-22 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > Grab the ncp package from http://www.fefe.de/ncp/, or more specifically > ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/unix/network/ncp/ncp-1.2.3.tar.bz2. > > It's a very useful and handy tool for pushing around data within > a LAN of a small workgroup, one guy does "npush foo" and yells >

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-22 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
Johannes Stezenbach wrote: Grab the ncp package from http://www.fefe.de/ncp/, or more specifically ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/unix/network/ncp/ncp-1.2.3.tar.bz2. It's a very useful and handy tool for pushing around data within a LAN of a small workgroup, one guy does npush foo and yells at the

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-21 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
Andrew Morton wrote: > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > (Added netdev cc) > > > > Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Now about IPv6: npush and npoll are two applications I wrote. npush > > > sends multicast announcements and opens a TCP socket. npoll

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-21 Thread Andrew Morton
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > (Added netdev cc) > > Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Now about IPv6: npush and npoll are two applications I wrote. npush > > sends multicast announcements and opens a TCP socket. npoll receives > > the multicast announcement

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-21 Thread Andrew Morton
Adam Belay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 17:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Finally Centrino SpeedStep. > > > I have a "Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.80GHz" in my notebook. > > > Linux does not support it. This

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-21 Thread Adam Belay
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 19:32, Andrew Morton wrote: > Adam Belay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 17:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Finally Centrino SpeedStep. > > > > I have a "Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-21 Thread Adam Belay
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 19:32, Andrew Morton wrote: Adam Belay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 17:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Finally Centrino SpeedStep. I have a Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.80GHz in my notebook.

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-21 Thread Andrew Morton
Adam Belay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 17:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Finally Centrino SpeedStep. I have a Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.80GHz in my notebook. Linux does not support it. This architecture has been

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-21 Thread Andrew Morton
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Added netdev cc) Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now about IPv6: npush and npoll are two applications I wrote. npush sends multicast announcements and opens a TCP socket. npoll receives the multicast announcement and connects to

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-21 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
Andrew Morton wrote: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Added netdev cc) Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now about IPv6: npush and npoll are two applications I wrote. npush sends multicast announcements and opens a TCP socket. npoll receives the multicast

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Felix von Leitner
Thus spake Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Finally Centrino SpeedStep. > > I have a "Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.80GHz" in my notebook. > > Linux does not support it. This architecture has been out there for > > months now, and there even was a patch to support it posted here a in >

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Felix von Leitner
Thus spake Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > My new nForce 4 mainboard has 10 or so USB 2.0 outlets. In Windows, > > they all work. In Linux, two of them work. Putting my USB stick or > > anything else in one of the others produces nothing in Linux. > > Apparently no IRQ getting through or

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Felix von Leitner
Thus spake Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): My new nForce 4 mainboard has 10 or so USB 2.0 outlets. In Windows, they all work. In Linux, two of them work. Putting my USB stick or anything else in one of the others produces nothing in Linux. Apparently no IRQ getting through or

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Felix von Leitner
Thus spake Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Finally Centrino SpeedStep. I have a Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.80GHz in my notebook. Linux does not support it. This architecture has been out there for months now, and there even was a patch to support it posted here a in October

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-12 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 11:24:16AM +0100, Stefan Rompf wrote: > Hi, > > Felix von Leitner wrote: > > > Did I mention that I'm really tired of you putting stones into ATI's > > way? You might believe you have a right to piss everyone off, after all > > people get what they paid for. Or maybe

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-12 Thread David Brownell
On Friday 11 March 2005 9:19 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > > (Restoring email headers. Please always use reply-to-all) > > Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Felix von Leitner wrote: > > > My new nForce 4 mainboard has 10 or so USB 2.0 outlets. In Windows, > > > they all work. In

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-12 Thread Stefan Rompf
Hi, Felix von Leitner wrote: > Did I mention that I'm really tired of you putting stones into ATI's > way? You might believe you have a right to piss everyone off, after all > people get what they paid for. Or maybe you think you are on a crusade > to promote open source software. But if you

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-12 Thread Stefan Rompf
Hi, Felix von Leitner wrote: Did I mention that I'm really tired of you putting stones into ATI's way? You might believe you have a right to piss everyone off, after all people get what they paid for. Or maybe you think you are on a crusade to promote open source software. But if you keep

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-12 Thread David Brownell
On Friday 11 March 2005 9:19 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: (Restoring email headers. Please always use reply-to-all) Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Felix von Leitner wrote: My new nForce 4 mainboard has 10 or so USB 2.0 outlets. In Windows, they all work. In Linux, two of

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-12 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 11:24:16AM +0100, Stefan Rompf wrote: Hi, Felix von Leitner wrote: Did I mention that I'm really tired of you putting stones into ATI's way? You might believe you have a right to piss everyone off, after all people get what they paid for. Or maybe you think

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-11 Thread Andrew Morton
(Restoring email headers. Please always use reply-to-all) Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Felix von Leitner wrote: > > My new nForce 4 mainboard has 10 or so USB 2.0 outlets. In Windows, > > they all work. In Linux, two of them work. Putting my USB stick or > > anything else in

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-11 Thread Robert Hancock
Felix von Leitner wrote: My new nForce 4 mainboard has 10 or so USB 2.0 outlets. In Windows, they all work. In Linux, two of them work. Putting my USB stick or anything else in one of the others produces nothing in Linux. Apparently no IRQ getting through or something? Likely similar to the

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-11 Thread Adam Belay
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 17:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Finally Centrino SpeedStep. > > I have a "Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.80GHz" in my notebook. > > Linux does not support it. This architecture has been out there for > > months now,

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-11 Thread Adam Belay
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 20:21 +, Felix von Leitner wrote: > Linux is getting less and less usable for me. :-( > > > My new nForce 4 mainboard has 10 or so USB 2.0 outlets. In Windows, > they all work. In Linux, two of them work. Putting my USB stick or > anything else in one of the others

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-11 Thread Andrew Morton
(Added netdev cc) Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now about IPv6: npush and npoll are two applications I wrote. npush > sends multicast announcements and opens a TCP socket. npoll receives > the multicast announcement and connects to the source IP/port/scope_id > of the

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-11 Thread Andrew Morton
Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Finally Centrino SpeedStep. > I have a "Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.80GHz" in my notebook. > Linux does not support it. This architecture has been out there for > months now, and there even was a patch to support it posted here a in > October

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-11 Thread Andrew Morton
Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My new nForce 4 mainboard has 10 or so USB 2.0 outlets. In Windows, > they all work. In Linux, two of them work. Putting my USB stick or > anything else in one of the others produces nothing in Linux. > Apparently no IRQ getting through or

2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-11 Thread Felix von Leitner
Linux is getting less and less usable for me. :-( My new nForce 4 mainboard has 10 or so USB 2.0 outlets. In Windows, they all work. In Linux, two of them work. Putting my USB stick or anything else in one of the others produces nothing in Linux. Apparently no IRQ getting through or

2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-11 Thread Felix von Leitner
Linux is getting less and less usable for me. :-( My new nForce 4 mainboard has 10 or so USB 2.0 outlets. In Windows, they all work. In Linux, two of them work. Putting my USB stick or anything else in one of the others produces nothing in Linux. Apparently no IRQ getting through or

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-11 Thread Andrew Morton
Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My new nForce 4 mainboard has 10 or so USB 2.0 outlets. In Windows, they all work. In Linux, two of them work. Putting my USB stick or anything else in one of the others produces nothing in Linux. Apparently no IRQ getting through or something?

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-11 Thread Andrew Morton
Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Finally Centrino SpeedStep. I have a Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.80GHz in my notebook. Linux does not support it. This architecture has been out there for months now, and there even was a patch to support it posted here a in October last year

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-11 Thread Andrew Morton
(Added netdev cc) Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now about IPv6: npush and npoll are two applications I wrote. npush sends multicast announcements and opens a TCP socket. npoll receives the multicast announcement and connects to the source IP/port/scope_id of the announcement.

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-11 Thread Adam Belay
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 20:21 +, Felix von Leitner wrote: Linux is getting less and less usable for me. :-( My new nForce 4 mainboard has 10 or so USB 2.0 outlets. In Windows, they all work. In Linux, two of them work. Putting my USB stick or anything else in one of the others

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-11 Thread Adam Belay
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 17:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Finally Centrino SpeedStep. I have a Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.80GHz in my notebook. Linux does not support it. This architecture has been out there for months now, and there even

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-11 Thread Robert Hancock
Felix von Leitner wrote: My new nForce 4 mainboard has 10 or so USB 2.0 outlets. In Windows, they all work. In Linux, two of them work. Putting my USB stick or anything else in one of the others produces nothing in Linux. Apparently no IRQ getting through or something? Likely similar to the

Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10

2005-03-11 Thread Andrew Morton
(Restoring email headers. Please always use reply-to-all) Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Felix von Leitner wrote: My new nForce 4 mainboard has 10 or so USB 2.0 outlets. In Windows, they all work. In Linux, two of them work. Putting my USB stick or anything else in one of