Re: 2.6.13-rc4: yenta_socket and swsusp

2005-08-07 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > 2. The attached script can produce all sorts of pcmcia related >problems if it is modified where stated - the attached version >seems to work without problems if not modified. Do you want >a bug report filed for this, too? Races in pcmcia, fun :-(. I guess this is going to be

Re: 2.6.13-rc4: yenta_socket and swsusp

2005-08-07 Thread Andreas Steinmetz
Andrew Morton wrote: > OK so we have one solid regression there. Are the other problems also new > since 2.6.11? > > Could you please retest 2.6.13-rc6 when it's out and if problems remain, > raise a bugzilla.kernel.org entry so we can keep track of the problem? > Thanks. After retesting with

Re: 2.6.13-rc4: yenta_socket and swsusp

2005-08-07 Thread Andreas Steinmetz
Andrew Morton wrote: OK so we have one solid regression there. Are the other problems also new since 2.6.11? Could you please retest 2.6.13-rc6 when it's out and if problems remain, raise a bugzilla.kernel.org entry so we can keep track of the problem? Thanks. After retesting with

Re: 2.6.13-rc4: yenta_socket and swsusp

2005-08-07 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! 2. The attached script can produce all sorts of pcmcia related problems if it is modified where stated - the attached version seems to work without problems if not modified. Do you want a bug report filed for this, too? Races in pcmcia, fun :-(. I guess this is going to be

Re: 2.6.13-rc4: yenta_socket and swsusp

2005-08-04 Thread Lee Revell
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 17:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Seems that the linux-kernel list has the same result ;( Are you serious, LKML is subscribers only now? Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More

Re: 2.6.13-rc4: yenta_socket and swsusp

2005-08-04 Thread Andrew Morton
Andreas Steinmetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [now sending to lkml as sending to the pcmcia list without being > subscribed seems to go to /dev/null] Seems that the linux-kernel list has the same result ;( > I do have problems with yenta_socket on my x86_64 laptop which appear > when using

Re: 2.6.13-rc4: yenta_socket and swsusp

2005-08-04 Thread Andrew Morton
Andreas Steinmetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [now sending to lkml as sending to the pcmcia list without being subscribed seems to go to /dev/null] Seems that the linux-kernel list has the same result ;( I do have problems with yenta_socket on my x86_64 laptop which appear when using swsusp

Re: 2.6.13-rc4: yenta_socket and swsusp

2005-08-04 Thread Lee Revell
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 17:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: Seems that the linux-kernel list has the same result ;( Are you serious, LKML is subscribers only now? Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More

2.6.13-rc4: yenta_socket and swsusp

2005-08-01 Thread Andreas Steinmetz
[now sending to lkml as sending to the pcmcia list without being subscribed seems to go to /dev/null] I do have problems with yenta_socket on my x86_64 laptop which appear when using swsusp (suspend to disk mode). 1. When I do not access any pcmcia device from initrd during boot I have to

2.6.13-rc4: yenta_socket and swsusp

2005-08-01 Thread Andreas Steinmetz
[now sending to lkml as sending to the pcmcia list without being subscribed seems to go to /dev/null] I do have problems with yenta_socket on my x86_64 laptop which appear when using swsusp (suspend to disk mode). 1. When I do not access any pcmcia device from initrd during boot I have to