On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 02:05:59PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> <-- snip -->
>
> ...
> NOT FOR MAINLINE!
>
> This is for the driver tutorial I give. It will not be included in the
> mainline kernel tree ever. Use the ldusb driver that is already there
> instead for this device.
>
> This is
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 02:05:59PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
-- snip --
...
NOT FOR MAINLINE!
This is for the driver tutorial I give. It will not be included in the
mainline kernel tree ever. Use the ldusb driver that is already there
instead for this device.
This is only a
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 17:42 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The MTD_UBI and the MTD_UBI_DEBUG_PARANOID_* options lack help texts.
thanks, fixed in our GIT tree.
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body
<-- snip -->
...
NOT FOR MAINLINE!
This is for the driver tutorial I give. It will not be included in the
mainline kernel tree ever. Use the ldusb driver that is already there
instead for this device.
This is only a teaching tool.
...
+ pkt = kmalloc(sizeof(*pkt), GFP_ATOMIC);
+
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 21:46 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> It doesn't seem to be intended that in ubi_dbg_vprint_nolock() the
> variable "caller" is never assigned any value different from 0.
>
thanks, fixed in our GIT tree.
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
-
To unsubscribe
On Wednesday, 13 December 2006 01:53, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Tuesday December 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > So when md writes to write out the superblock, to gets EIO... Odd that
> > > you aren't getting errors for normal writes.
> > >
> > > What devices are the md/raid1 built on?
> >
On Wednesday, 13 December 2006 01:53, Neil Brown wrote:
On Tuesday December 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So when md writes to write out the superblock, to gets EIO... Odd that
you aren't getting errors for normal writes.
What devices are the md/raid1 built on?
Sata drives,
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 21:46 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
It doesn't seem to be intended that in ubi_dbg_vprint_nolock() the
variable caller is never assigned any value different from 0.
thanks, fixed in our GIT tree.
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
-
To unsubscribe from
-- snip --
...
NOT FOR MAINLINE!
This is for the driver tutorial I give. It will not be included in the
mainline kernel tree ever. Use the ldusb driver that is already there
instead for this device.
This is only a teaching tool.
...
+ pkt = kmalloc(sizeof(*pkt), GFP_ATOMIC);
+
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 17:42 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
The MTD_UBI and the MTD_UBI_DEBUG_PARANOID_* options lack help texts.
thanks, fixed in our GIT tree.
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:17:42 +0800
Conke Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you for applying ATI SB600 SATA patch!
> But it seems the patch file name should be
> "ati"-sb600-sata-quirk.patch, not "via"-sb600-sata-quirk.patch, type
> error? :)
That's the sort of thing which happens
On Tuesday December 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > So when md writes to write out the superblock, to gets EIO... Odd that
> > you aren't getting errors for normal writes.
> >
> > What devices are the md/raid1 built on?
>
> Sata drives, on sata_uli.
>
> > >
> > > I'll try to reproduce it
> On Monday, 11 December 2006 09:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Temporarily at
> > > > >
> > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-mm1/
> > > > >
> > > > > Will appear later at
&
On 12/11/06, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:58:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.19-rc6-mm2:
>...
> git-ubi.patch
>...
> git trees.
>...
It doesn't seem to be intended that in ubi_dbg_vprint_nolock() the
variable "caller" is never
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:43:54 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:06:17 -0800
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > When I use ftp on 2.6.19-mm1, transfered file is always broken.
> > > like this:
> > >
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:43:54 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:06:17 -0800
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I use ftp on 2.6.19-mm1, transfered file is always broken.
like this:
==
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ file ./linux-2.6.19.tar.bz2
On 12/11/06, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:58:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.19-rc6-mm2:
...
git-ubi.patch
...
git trees.
...
It doesn't seem to be intended that in ubi_dbg_vprint_nolock() the
variable caller is never assigned any
:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19/2.6.19-mm1/
It caused all of the md RAID1s on my test box to drop one of their
partitions
On Tuesday December 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So when md writes to write out the superblock, to gets EIO... Odd that
you aren't getting errors for normal writes.
What devices are the md/raid1 built on?
Sata drives, on sata_uli.
I'll try to reproduce it tomorrow and
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:17:42 +0800
Conke Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for applying ATI SB600 SATA patch!
But it seems the patch file name should be
ati-sb600-sata-quirk.patch, not via-sb600-sata-quirk.patch, type
error? :)
That's the sort of thing which happens when people
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:06:17 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When I use ftp on 2.6.19-mm1, transfered file is always broken.
> > like this:
> > ==
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ file ./linux-2.6.19.tar.bz2 (got on 2.6.19-mm1)
> > ./linux-2.6.19.tar
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:53:41 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:58:07 -0800
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Temporarily at
> >
> > http://userweb.kernel.
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:58:07 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Temporarily at
>
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-mm1/
>
> Will appear later at
>
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.
> > > Temporarily at
> > > >
> > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-mm1/
> > > >
> > > > Will appear later at
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/ker
On Monday, 11 December 2006 23:52, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Monday December 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday, 11 December 2006 09:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > Temporarily at
> > >
> > > http://userweb.ke
On Monday December 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday, 11 December 2006 09:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Temporarily at
> >
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-mm1/
> >
> > Will appear later at
> >
> >
Hi,
On Monday, 11 December 2006 09:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Temporarily at
>
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-mm1/
>
> Will appear later at
>
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19/2.6.19-mm1/
It caused
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:58:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.19-rc6-mm2:
>...
> git-ubi.patch
>...
> git trees.
>...
It doesn't seem to be intended that in ubi_dbg_vprint_nolock() the
variable "caller" is never assigned any value different from 0.
cu
Adrian
--
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:58:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.19-rc6-mm2:
>...
> git-ubi.patch
>...
> git trees.
>...
The MTD_UBI and the MTD_UBI_DEBUG_PARANOID_* options lack help texts.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > >Do you have CONFIG_DEBUG_VM turned on? I think we miss clearning
> > >BH_New in some places, thus causing an error path to zero the block
> > >incorrectly if we hit an error that CONFIG_DEBUG_VM makes much more
> > >likely.
> > Yes, I have. Will
with 2.6.19-mm1 corrupted quite a lot
of files on my fs.
Sorry.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:58:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.19-rc6-mm2:
>...
> +x86_64-mm-i386-add-idle-notifier.patch
>
> x86 tree update
>...
This patch adds code and EXPORT_SYMBOL's that bloat the kernel for
everyone but are currently completely unused in the
d on? I think we miss clearning BH_New
> in some places, thus causing an error path to zero the block incorrectly
> if we hit an error that CONFIG_DEBUG_VM makes much more likely.
Yes, I have. Will retry without it and let you know if the problem goes
away.
Seems quite dangerous, a few minute
Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-mm1/
Am I the only one seeing something strange on ext3 with this kernel?
For example /etc/resolv.conf gets corrupted during the dhclient run. It
looks like
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Temporarily at
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-mm1/
Am I the only one seeing something strange on ext3 with this kernel?
For example /etc/resolv.conf gets corrupted during the dhclient run. It
looks like this, after dhclient fi
Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19/2.6.19-mm1/
- There's some new runtime debugging in kmap_atomic(). It catches one
buglet
Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19/2.6.19-mm1/
- There's some new runtime debugging in kmap_atomic(). It catches one
buglet
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-mm1/
Am I the only one seeing something strange on ext3 with this kernel?
For example /etc/resolv.conf gets corrupted during the dhclient run. It
looks like this, after dhclient finishes
Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-mm1/
Am I the only one seeing something strange on ext3 with this kernel?
For example /etc/resolv.conf gets corrupted during the dhclient run. It
looks like
BH_New
in some places, thus causing an error path to zero the block incorrectly
if we hit an error that CONFIG_DEBUG_VM makes much more likely.
Yes, I have. Will retry without it and let you know if the problem goes
away.
Seems quite dangerous, a few minutes with 2.6.19-mm1 corrupted quite
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:58:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.19-rc6-mm2:
...
+x86_64-mm-i386-add-idle-notifier.patch
x86 tree update
...
This patch adds code and EXPORT_SYMBOL's that bloat the kernel for
everyone but are currently completely unused in the kernel
with 2.6.19-mm1 corrupted quite a lot
of files on my fs.
Sorry.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Nick Piggin wrote:
Do you have CONFIG_DEBUG_VM turned on? I think we miss clearning
BH_New in some places, thus causing an error path to zero the block
incorrectly if we hit an error that CONFIG_DEBUG_VM makes much more
likely.
Yes, I have. Will retry without it
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:58:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.19-rc6-mm2:
...
git-ubi.patch
...
git trees.
...
The MTD_UBI and the MTD_UBI_DEBUG_PARANOID_* options lack help texts.
cu
Adrian
--
Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:58:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.19-rc6-mm2:
...
git-ubi.patch
...
git trees.
...
It doesn't seem to be intended that in ubi_dbg_vprint_nolock() the
variable caller is never assigned any value different from 0.
cu
Adrian
--
Is
Hi,
On Monday, 11 December 2006 09:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19/2.6.19-mm1/
It caused all of the md RAID1s on my test box
On Monday December 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Monday, 11 December 2006 09:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19/2.6.19
On Monday, 11 December 2006 23:52, Neil Brown wrote:
On Monday December 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Monday, 11 December 2006 09:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp
/2.6.19-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19/2.6.19-mm1/
It caused all of the md RAID1s on my test box to drop one of their
partitions,
apparently at random.
That's clever
Do you have
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:58:07 -0800
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19/2.6.19-mm1/
When I use ftp on 2.6.19-mm1
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:53:41 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:58:07 -0800
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.19-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:06:17 -0800
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I use ftp on 2.6.19-mm1, transfered file is always broken.
like this:
==
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ file ./linux-2.6.19.tar.bz2 (got on 2.6.19-mm1)
./linux-2.6.19.tar.bz2: data
(I confirmed original file
52 matches
Mail list logo
