On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 02:15:10AM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > This causes the following compile error with CONFIG_PTRACE=y,
> > CONFIG_PROC_FS=n:
>
> Bah. I moved ptrace_may_attach to fs/proc/base.c so that CONFIG_PTRACE=n
> could just omit kernel/ptrace.c entirely and still get the
> This causes the following compile error with CONFIG_PTRACE=y,
> CONFIG_PROC_FS=n:
Bah. I moved ptrace_may_attach to fs/proc/base.c so that CONFIG_PTRACE=n
could just omit kernel/ptrace.c entirely and still get the function for
fs/proc/base.c to use (and because that uses it many more times
This causes the following compile error with CONFIG_PTRACE=y,
CONFIG_PROC_FS=n:
Bah. I moved ptrace_may_attach to fs/proc/base.c so that CONFIG_PTRACE=n
could just omit kernel/ptrace.c entirely and still get the function for
fs/proc/base.c to use (and because that uses it many more times than
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 02:15:10AM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
This causes the following compile error with CONFIG_PTRACE=y,
CONFIG_PROC_FS=n:
Bah. I moved ptrace_may_attach to fs/proc/base.c so that CONFIG_PTRACE=n
could just omit kernel/ptrace.c entirely and still get the function for
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:14:08AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.20-rc6-mm3:
>...
> +utrace-utrace-ptrace-compat.patch
>...
> utrace tree
>...
This causes the following compile error with CONFIG_PTRACE=y,
CONFIG_PROC_FS=n:
<-- snip -->
...
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:14:08AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.20-rc6-mm3:
...
+utrace-utrace-ptrace-compat.patch
...
utrace tree
...
This causes the following compile error with CONFIG_PTRACE=y,
CONFIG_PROC_FS=n:
-- snip --
...
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
6 matches
Mail list logo