On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, David Chinner wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 04:47:38AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Including the XFS mailing list in here too because it may be an XFS bug
looking at the call trace.
System: Debian Testing
Kernel: 2.6.20
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, David Chinner wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 04:47:38AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Including the XFS mailing list in here too because it may be an XFS bug
looking at the call trace.
System: Debian Testing
Kernel: 2.6.20
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 04:47:38AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
> >Including the XFS mailing list in here too because it may be an XFS bug
> >looking at the call trace.
> >
> >System: Debian Testing
> >Kernel: 2.6.20
> >Config: Attached
> >
> >I was
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 04:47:38AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Including the XFS mailing list in here too because it may be an XFS bug
looking at the call trace.
System: Debian Testing
Kernel: 2.6.20
Config: Attached
I was running apt-get
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Including the XFS mailing list in here too because it may be an XFS bug
looking at the call trace.
System: Debian Testing
Kernel: 2.6.20
Config: Attached
I was running apt-get dist-upgrade as I always do to get the latest packages
upgraded and the
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Including the XFS mailing list in here too because it may be an XFS bug
looking at the call trace.
System: Debian Testing
Kernel: 2.6.20
Config: Attached
I was running apt-get dist-upgrade as I always do to get the latest packages
upgraded and the
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 08:39:16PM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> The i_sem leak was hitting us on sles9 - 2.6.5 base kernel - and it was fixed
> before the i_sem -> i_mutex conversion in mainline. Some time around 2.6.16,
> IIRC. Given this was a 2.6.20 kernel, there'd be an almighty kaboom if
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 10:20:13AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:45:37AM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> > No idea - it looks like dkpg was trying to remove a directory on the
> > same path the lookup was and both have gone splat in __d_lookup on
> > the same dentry.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:45:37AM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> No idea - it looks like dkpg was trying to remove a directory on the
> same path the lookup was and both have gone splat in __d_lookup on
> the same dentry. Something happened in those 180 days that left a
> landmine that was
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:45:37AM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
No idea - it looks like dkpg was trying to remove a directory on the
same path the lookup was and both have gone splat in __d_lookup on
the same dentry. Something happened in those 180 days that left a
landmine that was tripped
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 10:20:13AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:45:37AM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
No idea - it looks like dkpg was trying to remove a directory on the
same path the lookup was and both have gone splat in __d_lookup on
the same dentry.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 08:39:16PM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
The i_sem leak was hitting us on sles9 - 2.6.5 base kernel - and it was fixed
before the i_sem - i_mutex conversion in mainline. Some time around 2.6.16,
IIRC. Given this was a 2.6.20 kernel, there'd be an almighty kaboom if that
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 01:20:17PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Including the XFS mailing list in here too because it may be an XFS bug
> looking at the call trace.
>
> System: Debian Testing
> Kernel: 2.6.20
> Config: Attached
>
> I was running apt-get dist-upgrade as I always do to get the
Including the XFS mailing list in here too because it may be an XFS bug
looking at the call trace.
System: Debian Testing
Kernel: 2.6.20
Config: Attached
I was running apt-get dist-upgrade as I always do to get the latest
packages upgraded and the kernel OOPS'd when it was upgrading 'tzdata'
Including the XFS mailing list in here too because it may be an XFS bug
looking at the call trace.
System: Debian Testing
Kernel: 2.6.20
Config: Attached
I was running apt-get dist-upgrade as I always do to get the latest
packages upgraded and the kernel OOPS'd when it was upgrading 'tzdata'
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 01:20:17PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Including the XFS mailing list in here too because it may be an XFS bug
looking at the call trace.
System: Debian Testing
Kernel: 2.6.20
Config: Attached
I was running apt-get dist-upgrade as I always do to get the latest
16 matches
Mail list logo
