Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:41:22AM +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2007 00:43:05 -0700, "Greg KH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > > And the winner is: > > > > > > > > gregkh-driver-driver-core-make-uevent-environment-available-in-uevent-file.patch > > > > > > > > Reverting only

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 02.05.2007 22:07 schrieb Andrew Morton: >> Started to git-bisect mainline now, but that will take some time. [...] > I don't think there's much point in you doing that. We know what the bug is. Good. Saves me some work. :-) If you'd like me to test anything, just let me know. Thanks, Tilman

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 02 May 2007 19:36:03 +0200 Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am 02.05.2007 09:52 schrieb Greg KH: > > Tilman, here's a patch, can you try this on top of your tree that dies? > > 2.6.21-git3 plus that patch comes up fine. > > (Except for a UDP problem I seem to remember I

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 02.05.2007 09:52 schrieb Greg KH: > Tilman, here's a patch, can you try this on top of your tree that dies? 2.6.21-git3 plus that patch comes up fine. (Except for a UDP problem I seem to remember I already saw reported on lkml and which I'll ignore for now in order not to blur the picture.)

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Kay Sievers
On 5/2/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:10:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 02 May 2007 09:01:22 +0200 Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: > > > Not really - everything's tangled up. A bisection

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Tilman Schmidt
On Wed, 2 May 2007 00:43:05 -0700, "Greg KH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > And the winner is: > > > > > > gregkh-driver-driver-core-make-uevent-environment-available-in-uevent-file.patch > > > > > > Reverting only that from 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 gives me a working kernel > > > again. > > Wait, even

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:10:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 02 May 2007 09:01:22 +0200 Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: > > > Not really - everything's tangled up. A bisection search on the > > > 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 driver tree

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:10:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 02 May 2007 09:01:22 +0200 Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: > > > Not really - everything's tangled up. A bisection search on the > > > 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 driver tree

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:10:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 02 May 2007 09:01:22 +0200 Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: > > > Not really - everything's tangled up. A bisection search on the > > > 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 driver tree

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 02 May 2007 09:01:22 +0200 Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: > > Not really - everything's tangled up. A bisection search on the > > 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 driver tree would be the best bet. > > And the winner is: > >

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Nick Piggin
Tilman Schmidt wrote: Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: Not really - everything's tangled up. A bisection search on the 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 driver tree would be the best bet. And the winner is: gregkh-driver-driver-core-make-uevent-environment-available-in-uevent-file.patch +

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 09:01:22AM +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: > > Not really - everything's tangled up. A bisection search on the > > 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 driver tree would be the best bet. > > And the winner is: > >

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: > Not really - everything's tangled up. A bisection search on the > 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 driver tree would be the best bet. And the winner is: gregkh-driver-driver-core-make-uevent-environment-available-in-uevent-file.patch Reverting only that from

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: Not really - everything's tangled up. A bisection search on the 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 driver tree would be the best bet. And the winner is: gregkh-driver-driver-core-make-uevent-environment-available-in-uevent-file.patch Reverting only that from

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 09:01:22AM +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote: Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: Not really - everything's tangled up. A bisection search on the 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 driver tree would be the best bet. And the winner is:

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 02 May 2007 09:01:22 +0200 Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: Not really - everything's tangled up. A bisection search on the 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 driver tree would be the best bet. And the winner is:

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Nick Piggin
Tilman Schmidt wrote: Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: Not really - everything's tangled up. A bisection search on the 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 driver tree would be the best bet. And the winner is: gregkh-driver-driver-core-make-uevent-environment-available-in-uevent-file.patch +

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:10:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 02 May 2007 09:01:22 +0200 Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: Not really - everything's tangled up. A bisection search on the 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 driver tree would be the

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:10:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 02 May 2007 09:01:22 +0200 Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: Not really - everything's tangled up. A bisection search on the 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 driver tree would be the

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:10:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 02 May 2007 09:01:22 +0200 Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: Not really - everything's tangled up. A bisection search on the 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 driver tree would be the

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Tilman Schmidt
On Wed, 2 May 2007 00:43:05 -0700, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: And the winner is: gregkh-driver-driver-core-make-uevent-environment-available-in-uevent-file.patch Reverting only that from 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 gives me a working kernel again. Wait, even though this isn't good,

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Kay Sievers
On 5/2/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:10:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 02 May 2007 09:01:22 +0200 Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: Not really - everything's tangled up. A bisection search on the

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 02.05.2007 09:52 schrieb Greg KH: Tilman, here's a patch, can you try this on top of your tree that dies? 2.6.21-git3 plus that patch comes up fine. (Except for a UDP problem I seem to remember I already saw reported on lkml and which I'll ignore for now in order not to blur the picture.)

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 02 May 2007 19:36:03 +0200 Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am 02.05.2007 09:52 schrieb Greg KH: Tilman, here's a patch, can you try this on top of your tree that dies? 2.6.21-git3 plus that patch comes up fine. (Except for a UDP problem I seem to remember I already saw

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 02.05.2007 22:07 schrieb Andrew Morton: Started to git-bisect mainline now, but that will take some time. [...] I don't think there's much point in you doing that. We know what the bug is. Good. Saves me some work. :-) If you'd like me to test anything, just let me know. Thanks, Tilman

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-02 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:41:22AM +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote: On Wed, 2 May 2007 00:43:05 -0700, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: And the winner is: gregkh-driver-driver-core-make-uevent-environment-available-in-uevent-file.patch Reverting only that from 2.6.21-rc7-mm2

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-01 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 01:26:44PM +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: > > Sure, but what about 2.6.21-git3 (or, better, current -git)? > > 2.6.21-git3 crashed with panic blink at "scanning usb: .." > (Nothing in the log this time.) Eeek, that's not good.

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-01 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: > Sure, but what about 2.6.21-git3 (or, better, current -git)? 2.6.21-git3 crashed with panic blink at "scanning usb: .." (Nothing in the log this time.) Will continue bisecting -rc7-mm2. HTH T. -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail:

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-01 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: Sure, but what about 2.6.21-git3 (or, better, current -git)? 2.6.21-git3 crashed with panic blink at scanning usb: .. (Nothing in the log this time.) Will continue bisecting -rc7-mm2. HTH T. -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: [EMAIL

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-05-01 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 01:26:44PM +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote: Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: Sure, but what about 2.6.21-git3 (or, better, current -git)? 2.6.21-git3 crashed with panic blink at scanning usb: .. (Nothing in the log this time.) Eeek, that's not good. Can you

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-04-30 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: >> 2.6.21-final is fine. > > Sure, but what about 2.6.21-git3 (or, better, current -git)? OIC. Sorry for being dense. Will check. >>> If that's OK then we need to pick through the difference between >>> 2.6.21-rc7-mm2's driver tree and the patches

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-04-30 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:28:06 +0200 Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am 30.04.2007 20:21 schrieb Andrew Morton: > > A lot of Greg's driver tree has gone upstream, so please check current > > mainline. > > 2.6.21-final is fine. Sure, but what about 2.6.21-git3 (or, better, current

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-04-30 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 30.04.2007 20:21 schrieb Andrew Morton: > A lot of Greg's driver tree has gone upstream, so please check current > mainline. 2.6.21-final is fine. > If that's OK then we need to pick through the difference between > 2.6.21-rc7-mm2's driver tree and the patches which went into mainline. And

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-04-30 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:17:02 +0200 Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> With kernel 2.6.21-rc7-mm2, my Dell Optiplex GX110 (P3/933) regularly > >> crashes during the SuSE 10.1 startup sequence. When booting to RL5, > >> it panicblinks shortly after the graphical login screen appears. >

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-04-30 Thread Tilman Schmidt
>> With kernel 2.6.21-rc7-mm2, my Dell Optiplex GX110 (P3/933) regularly >> crashes during the SuSE 10.1 startup sequence. When booting to RL5, >> it panicblinks shortly after the graphical login screen appears. >> Booting to RL3, it hangs after the startup message: I have now bisected this down

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-04-30 Thread Tilman Schmidt
With kernel 2.6.21-rc7-mm2, my Dell Optiplex GX110 (P3/933) regularly crashes during the SuSE 10.1 startup sequence. When booting to RL5, it panicblinks shortly after the graphical login screen appears. Booting to RL3, it hangs after the startup message: I have now bisected this down to the

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-04-30 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:17:02 +0200 Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With kernel 2.6.21-rc7-mm2, my Dell Optiplex GX110 (P3/933) regularly crashes during the SuSE 10.1 startup sequence. When booting to RL5, it panicblinks shortly after the graphical login screen appears. Booting to

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-04-30 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 30.04.2007 20:21 schrieb Andrew Morton: A lot of Greg's driver tree has gone upstream, so please check current mainline. 2.6.21-final is fine. If that's OK then we need to pick through the difference between 2.6.21-rc7-mm2's driver tree and the patches which went into mainline. And

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-04-30 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:28:06 +0200 Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am 30.04.2007 20:21 schrieb Andrew Morton: A lot of Greg's driver tree has gone upstream, so please check current mainline. 2.6.21-final is fine. Sure, but what about 2.6.21-git3 (or, better, current -git)? If

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-04-30 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton: 2.6.21-final is fine. Sure, but what about 2.6.21-git3 (or, better, current -git)? OIC. Sorry for being dense. Will check. If that's OK then we need to pick through the difference between 2.6.21-rc7-mm2's driver tree and the patches which went

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-04-28 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > It seems wildly screwed up that we have a PageReserved() page with a pfn of > zero (!) which claims to be in a reiserfs mapping, only it isn't attached > to a reiserfs file. How the heck did that happen? It's "simply" that it somehow got a spurious

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-04-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:56:59 +0200 Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With kernel 2.6.21-rc7-mm2, my Dell Optiplex GX110 (P3/933) regularly > crashes during the SuSE 10.1 startup sequence. When booting to RL5, > it panicblinks shortly after the graphical login screen appears. > Booting

2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-04-28 Thread Tilman Schmidt
With kernel 2.6.21-rc7-mm2, my Dell Optiplex GX110 (P3/933) regularly crashes during the SuSE 10.1 startup sequence. When booting to RL5, it panicblinks shortly after the graphical login screen appears. Booting to RL3, it hangs after the startup message: Starting Firewall Initialization (phase 2

2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-04-28 Thread Tilman Schmidt
With kernel 2.6.21-rc7-mm2, my Dell Optiplex GX110 (P3/933) regularly crashes during the SuSE 10.1 startup sequence. When booting to RL5, it panicblinks shortly after the graphical login screen appears. Booting to RL3, it hangs after the startup message: Starting Firewall Initialization (phase 2

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-04-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:56:59 +0200 Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With kernel 2.6.21-rc7-mm2, my Dell Optiplex GX110 (P3/933) regularly crashes during the SuSE 10.1 startup sequence. When booting to RL5, it panicblinks shortly after the graphical login screen appears. Booting to RL3,

Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)

2007-04-28 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: It seems wildly screwed up that we have a PageReserved() page with a pfn of zero (!) which claims to be in a reiserfs mapping, only it isn't attached to a reiserfs file. How the heck did that happen? It's simply that it somehow got a spurious page