> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've recently compiled a "vanilla" 2.6.21 kernel, patched with Ingo
>> Molnar's rt-8 patch, as I was unable to compile with rt-7.
>>
>> I needed it because I'm using audio applications (tests were made with
>> FrugalWare, but I don't
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've recently compiled a vanilla 2.6.21 kernel, patched with Ingo
Molnar's rt-8 patch, as I was unable to compile with rt-7.
I needed it because I'm using audio applications (tests were made with
FrugalWare, but I don't think it's a distro
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently compiled a "vanilla" 2.6.21 kernel, patched with Ingo Molnar's
> rt-8 patch, as I was unable to compile with rt-7.
>
> I needed it because I'm using audio applications (tests were made with
> FrugalWare, but I don't think it's
Hi,
I've recently compiled a "vanilla" 2.6.21 kernel, patched with Ingo Molnar's
rt-8 patch, as I was unable to compile with rt-7.
I needed it because I'm using audio applications (tests were made with
FrugalWare, but I don't think it's a distro issue).
Everything was allright until I changed
Hi,
I've recently compiled a vanilla 2.6.21 kernel, patched with Ingo Molnar's
rt-8 patch, as I was unable to compile with rt-7.
I needed it because I'm using audio applications (tests were made with
FrugalWare, but I don't think it's a distro issue).
Everything was allright until I changed my
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've recently compiled a vanilla 2.6.21 kernel, patched with Ingo Molnar's
rt-8 patch, as I was unable to compile with rt-7.
I needed it because I'm using audio applications (tests were made with
FrugalWare, but I don't think it's a distro
6 matches
Mail list logo