On 10/5/07, Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 05:01:47PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 10/2/07, Tony Breeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:30:16AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > >
> > > > I realise it'll make the patch bigger,
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 05:01:47PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> On 10/2/07, Tony Breeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:30:16AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >
> > > I realise it'll make the patch bigger, but this doesn't seem like a
> > > particularly good name for
On 10/2/07, Tony Breeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:30:16AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> > I realise it'll make the patch bigger, but this doesn't seem like a
> > particularly good name for the variable anymore.
>
> Sure, what about?
>
> Clarify when RTAS logging i
Berck E. Nash wrote:
Greetings,
I get a few million of these on boot-- the system never actually boots.
Works fine in 2.6.23-rc7.
[ 50.456012] ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0
[ 50.462484] ata2.00: irq_stat 0x4001
[ 50.466441] ata2.00: cmd e5/00:00:00:00:00/00
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 02:09:46PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> Until we initialise what exactly?
Until we allocate the error log buffer. The original crash was
for a null-pointer deref of the unallocated buffer. I just sent
out a patch to fix this; its a bit simpler than the below.
In t
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:19 +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:30:16AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> > I realise it'll make the patch bigger, but this doesn't seem like a
> > particularly good name for the variable anymore.
>
> Sure, what about?
Better .. but .. :D
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:30:16AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> I realise it'll make the patch bigger, but this doesn't seem like a
> particularly good name for the variable anymore.
Sure, what about?
Clarify when RTAS logging is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 10:26 +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 06:28:19PM -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 01:35:31PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > > Seeing the following from an older power LPAR, pretty sure we had
> > > this in the previous -mm also:
> >
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 06:28:19PM -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 01:35:31PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > Seeing the following from an older power LPAR, pretty sure we had
> > this in the previous -mm also:
>
> I haven't forgetten about this ... and am looking at it now.
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 01:35:31PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Seeing the following from an older power LPAR, pretty sure we had
> this in the previous -mm also:
I haven't forgetten about this ... and am looking at it now.
Seems that whenever I go to reserve the machine pSeries-102,
someone els
On 09/24/2007 09:41 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>
>> Hmm, I have usb legacy keyboard switched on because of grub and bios to
>> allow me
>> typing.
>>
>> I booted 23-rc7 4 times, and the latest -mm 3 times just now and can't
>> reproduce
>> it, I just wonder b
Berck E. Nash wrote:
> Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> One of these appears in my system as well (ASUS P5W-DH Deluxe
>> mainboard). Here's the hdparm output:
>
> Yup, same mainboard here.
>
>> Since about 2.6.17 or 2.6.18, it has been causing long delays while
>> booting:
>> ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> One of these appears in my system as well (ASUS P5W-DH Deluxe
> mainboard). Here's the hdparm output:
Yup, same mainboard here.
> Since about 2.6.17 or 2.6.18, it has been causing long delays while
> booting:
> ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
> ata2.
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Would it also be possible for you to send along 'hdparm --Istdout'
> output for your config disk thingy, /dev/sdd ?
Sure, just don't ask me what it is! (I've generally assumed that
writing to it would be a bad idea.)
Berck
/dev/sdd:
0040 3fff c837 0010 003f
0
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Would it also be possible for you to send along 'hdparm --Istdout'
output for your config disk thingy, /dev/sdd ?
One of these appears in my system as well (ASUS P5W-DH Deluxe
mainboard). Here's the hdparm output:
/dev/sdb:
0040 3fff c837 0010 003f
000
Would it also be possible for you to send along 'hdparm --Istdout'
output for your config disk thingy, /dev/sdd ?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
Berck E. Nash wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Does the attached patch change behavior at all? You should be able to
apply it on top of libata-dev.git#upstream or -mm.
Still broken, dmesg with ATA_DEBUG defined, attached.
Great, this will be useful output. It will probably be a couple days
befor
Berck E. Nash wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Once the blame has been squared fixed upon me :) you can use git-bisect
to locate the precise change that broke your setup.
Okay, here's the problem:
268fe6f9f15551be9abedd44a237392675d529d5 is first bad commit
commit 268fe6f9f15551be9abedd44a237392675d
Robert Hancock wrote:
ATA spec says "The device shall return command aborted if the device
does not support the Power Management feature set." Whereas TEST UNIT
READY is required for SCSI. It seems the SAT authors didn't consider
this case.
Dumb me -- I misread that as mandatory.
Je
Berck E. Nash wrote:
> hdparm output attached.
Whoops, it really is this time.
/dev/sde:
427a 3fff 0010 e100 0258 003f
000e 5744 2d57 4d41 4b48 3131 3235
3131 3700 0003 4000 004a 3331
2e30 3846 3331 5744 4320 5744 3336 3047
442d 3030 464c 4132 2020 2020 2020 2020
2020 20
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Berck E. Nash wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Once the blame has been squared fixed upon me :) you can use git-bisect
to locate the precise change that broke your setup.
Okay, here's the problem:
268fe6f9f15551be9abedd44a237392675d529d5 is first bad commit
commit 268fe6f9f15551b
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Can you tell me something about this device?
>
> [ 49.045635] ata2.00: ATA-6: Config Disk, RGL10364, max UDMA/133
> [ 49.051677] ata2.00: 640 sectors, multi 1: LBA
> [ 49.056321] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
>
> It seems like it does not support the 'check power mo
Berck E. Nash wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Once the blame has been squared fixed upon me :) you can use git-bisect
to locate the precise change that broke your setup.
Okay, here's the problem:
268fe6f9f15551be9abedd44a237392675d529d5 is first bad commit
commit 268fe6f9f15551be9abedd44a237392675d
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Once the blame has been squared fixed upon me :) you can use git-bisect
> to locate the precise change that broke your setup.
Okay, here's the problem:
268fe6f9f15551be9abedd44a237392675d529d5 is first bad commit
commit 268fe6f9f15551be9abedd44a237392675d529d5
Author: Jeff Ga
On Tue, Sep 25 2007, Berck E. Nash wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 25 2007, Berck E. Nash wrote:
> >> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >>
> >>> The first step would be to clone the "upstream" branch of
> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git
> >>>
> >>> and see if
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25 2007, Berck E. Nash wrote:
>> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>
>>> The first step would be to clone the "upstream" branch of
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git
>>>
>>> and see if the problem is reproducible there. If yes, then you have
On Tue, Sep 25 2007, Berck E. Nash wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > The first step would be to clone the "upstream" branch of
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git
> >
> > and see if the problem is reproducible there. If yes, then you have
> > narrowed down th
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> The first step would be to clone the "upstream" branch of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git
>
> and see if the problem is reproducible there. If yes, then you have
> narrowed down the problem to something my ATA devel tree has introduced
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:32 +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> Balbir Singh wrote:
> > On 9/25/07, Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Exactly same call trace is produced over IA64 Madison (up to 9M cache)
> >> with 8 cpu's.
> >> --
> >
> > Hi, Kamalesh,
> >
> > Could you please repro
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:20:58 +0200 Peter Zijlstra
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Nope, and the stacktrace is utterly puzzling.
/me goes read the lkml.org link
Kamalesh Babulal: do you still get:
BUG: spinlock bad magic on
msgs?
On Tue, Sep 25 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On (25/09/07 12:31), Jens Axboe didst pronounce:
> > On Tue, Sep 25 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > On (25/09/07 01:11), Kamalesh Babulal didst pronounce:
> > >
> > > Hi Kamalesh,
> > >
> > > > The build fails with following error
> > > >
> > > > CC drivers
On (25/09/07 12:31), Jens Axboe didst pronounce:
> On Tue, Sep 25 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On (25/09/07 01:11), Kamalesh Babulal didst pronounce:
> >
> > Hi Kamalesh,
> >
> > > The build fails with following error
> > >
> > > CC drivers/block/ps3disk.o
> > > drivers/block/ps3disk.c: In functi
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:20:58 +0200 Peter Zijlstra
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Nope, and the stacktrace is utterly puzzling.
> > >
> > > /me goes read the lkml.org link
> > >
> > > Kamalesh Babulal: do you still get:
> > > BUG: spinlock bad magic on
> > >
> > > msgs?
> > >
> > > Because
On Tue, Sep 25 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On (25/09/07 01:11), Kamalesh Babulal didst pronounce:
>
> Hi Kamalesh,
>
> > The build fails with following error
> >
> > CC drivers/block/ps3disk.o
> > drivers/block/ps3disk.c: In function ???ps3disk_scatter_gather???:
> > drivers/block/ps3disk.c:115: e
On (25/09/07 01:11), Kamalesh Babulal didst pronounce:
Hi Kamalesh,
> The build fails with following error
>
> CC drivers/block/ps3disk.o
> drivers/block/ps3disk.c: In function ???ps3disk_scatter_gather???:
> drivers/block/ps3disk.c:115: error: ???bio??? undeclared (first use in this
> function)
Balbir Singh wrote:
> On 9/25/07, Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Exactly same call trace is produced over IA64 Madison (up to 9M cache) with
>> 8 cpu's.
>> --
>
> Hi, Kamalesh,
>
> Could you please reproduce the problem or share the steps to reproduce
> the problem?
>
> Thanks,
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 09:32 +0200, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On 9/24/07, Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can your check whether 2.6.23-rc7 +
> > http://tglx.de/projects/hrtimers/2.6.23-rc7/patch-2.6.23-rc7-hrt1.patch
> >
> > works for you ?
>
> Yes, powers off normally.
Ok, so it's
On 9/24/07, Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can your check whether 2.6.23-rc7 +
> http://tglx.de/projects/hrtimers/2.6.23-rc7/patch-2.6.23-rc7-hrt1.patch
>
> works for you ?
Yes, powers off normally.
Torsten
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
On 9/25/07, Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly same call trace is produced over IA64 Madison (up to 9M cache) with 8
> cpu's.
> --
Hi, Kamalesh,
Could you please reproduce the problem or share the steps to reproduce
the problem?
Thanks,
Balbir
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
Berck E. Nash wrote:
Greetings,
I get a few million of these on boot-- the system never actually boots.
Works fine in 2.6.23-rc7.
[ 50.456012] ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0
[ 50.462484] ata2.00: irq_stat 0x4001
[ 50.466441] ata2.00: cmd e5/00:00:00:00:00/00
[adding kexec m-l]
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:10:36 +0200 Laurent Riffard wrote:
> Le 24.09.2007 11:17, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
> >
>
> I've got this compilation when CONFIG_KEXEC
Le 24.09.2007 11:17, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
>
I've got this compilation when CONFIG_KEXEC=y and CCONFIG_NOHIGHMEM=y:
linux-2.6-mm$ LANG=C make
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK in
* Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Taking a quick look at [__]{en|de|queue_entity() and the functions
> they call, I see something suspicious in set_leftmost() in
> sched_fair.c:
>
> static inline void
> set_leftmost(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct rb_node *leftmost)
> {
> s
Hi Andrew,
The drivers/net/pasemi_mac seems to be broken and build fails with
CC [M] drivers/net/pasemi_mac.o
drivers/net/pasemi_mac.c: In function ‘pasemi_mac_probe’:
drivers/net/pasemi_mac.c:1153: error: conflicting types for ‘mac’
drivers/net/pasemi_mac.c:1151: error: previous declaration of ‘
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:02:22PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Kamalesh.
>
> > The link error for a PowerMac G5 (powerpc) is still seen with
> > 2.6.23-rc7-mm1,
> > and was reported for 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/19/62).
> >
> &g
atches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
- New git tree git-powerpc-galak.patch added to the -mm lineup: ppc32
things, mainly (Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
I'm observing a problem with this kernel (as well as 2.6.23-rc6-mm1) which
manifests itself only in my Postfix/application mail.
Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> I looked around on the MLs for mention of this, but didn't find anything
> that appeared to match.
>
> Platform: HP rx8620 - 16-cpu/32GB/4-node ia64 [Madison]
>
> 2.6.23-rc7-mm1 broken out -- panic occurs when git-sched.patch pushed:
>
>
I looked around on the MLs for mention of this, but didn't find anything
that appeared to match.
Platform: HP rx8620 - 16-cpu/32GB/4-node ia64 [Madison]
2.6.23-rc7-mm1 broken out -- panic occurs when git-sched.patch pushed:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference (ad
Hi Kamalesh.
> The link error for a PowerMac G5 (powerpc) is still seen with
> 2.6.23-rc7-mm1,
> and was reported for 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/19/62).
>
> KSYM.tmp_kallsyms1.S
> AS .tmp_kallsyms1.o
> LD .tmp_vmlinux2
> KSYM
Len dropped all that code over the weekend (which is when I
> picked this copy of his tree), so 2.6.23-rc7-mm1 doesn't have the cpuidle
> code. Len will be reapplying the cpuidle patches today(ish) so next -mm
> _will_ have the cpuidle code.
>
> So what we have in rc7-mm
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hmm, I have usb legacy keyboard switched on because of grub and bios to allow
> me
> typing.
>
> I booted 23-rc7 4 times, and the latest -mm 3 times just now and can't
> reproduce
> it, I just wonder by what is this conditioned.
Warm boot vs. cold boot
Hi Andrew,
The build fails with following error
CC drivers/block/ps3disk.o
drivers/block/ps3disk.c: In function ‘ps3disk_scatter_gather’:
drivers/block/ps3disk.c:115: error: ‘bio’ undeclared (first use in this
function)
drivers/block/ps3disk.c:115: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
reported o
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:07:19 +0200
"Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/24/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
>
> With the five ho
g/lkml/2007/8/10/20 and the
> >>> mm-dirty-balancing-for-tasks.patch was dropped from 2.6.23-rc2-mm2.
> >>> And the same patch is in this -mm version, suspect whether is it the
> >>> same patch triggering this Bug.
> >>>
>
//ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
>>>> Fine, but on some boots (I noticed this on rc6-mm1 too, but not before):
>>>> :00:1a.7 EHCI: BIOS handoff failed (BIOS bug ?) 01010001
>>>> :00:1d.7 EHCI: BIOS ha
On 9/24/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
With the five hotfixes applied it works for me.
But it fails to power down my system when shutting down.
It prints twice 'System h
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 09/24/2007 04:41 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >
> >> On 09/24/2007 11:17 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-r
On 09/24/2007 04:41 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>
>> On 09/24/2007 11:17 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
>> Fine, but on some boots (I noticed t
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 09:59:29AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:52:30 +1000 Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 24/09/2007 7:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akp
his -mm version, suspect whether is it the
>>> same patch triggering this Bug.
>>>
>>> BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [events/0:15]
>>> CPU 0:
>>> Modules linked in:
>>> Pid: 15, comm: events/0 Tainted: G D 2.6.23-rc7-mm1-autokern1
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:52:30 +1000 Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 24/09/2007 7:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
> >
> > - New git tree git-powerpc-ga
this Bug.
> >
> > BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [events/0:15]
> > CPU 0:
> > Modules linked in:
> > Pid: 15, comm: events/0 Tainted: G D 2.6.23-rc7-mm1-autokern1 #1
> > RIP: 0010:[] []
> > __smp_call_function_mask+0x9a/0xc4
> > RS
* Peter Zijlstra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:03:58 -0400 Mathieu Desnoyers
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ingo,
> >
> > I got the following printk when booting 2.6.23-rc7-mm1 :
> >
> > BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES too
On Mon, Sep 24 2007, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> > putting Vlad in Cc:
> >
> > Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> >> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
> >
On Mon, Sep 24 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> putting Vlad in Cc:
>
> Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
> >
> > I also get this compile erro
On Mon, Sep 24 2007, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
>
> /home/clg/linux/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c: In function
> `dasd_eckd_build_cp':
> /hom
lancing-for-tasks.patch was dropped from 2.6.23-rc2-mm2.
> And the same patch is in this -mm version, suspect whether is it the
> same patch triggering this Bug.
>
> BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [events/0:15]
> CPU 0:
> Modules linked in:
> Pid: 15, comm: events
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:03:58 -0400 Mathieu Desnoyers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> I got the following printk when booting 2.6.23-rc7-mm1 :
>
> BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES too low!
> turning off the locking correctness validator.
>
> Is it known/correc
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 09:26 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:51:05 +0400 Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > static void lock_and_coalesce_cpu_mnt_writer_counts(void)
> > {
> > int cpu;
> > struct mnt_writer *cpu_writer;
> >
> > for_each_possible_cpu(c
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:51:05 +0400 Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> static void lock_and_coalesce_cpu_mnt_writer_counts(void)
> {
> int cpu;
> struct mnt_writer *cpu_writer;
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> cpu_writer = &per_cpu(mnt_writers, cpu);
>
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> Balbir Singh wrote:
>> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>>> Please, try with this patch too:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
>>> index c0fe71a..f599508 100644
>>> --- a/fs/locks.c
>>> +++ b/fs/locks.c
>>> @@ -1423,7 +1423,7 @@ int generic_setlease(struct file *filp,
>>>
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:45:32 PDT, Dave Hansen said:
> Any idea which fs and distro this was? I'd like to add it to my tests.
initscripts-8.56-1, from Fedora Rawhide, /etc/rc.sysinit, line 325:
touch /dev/.in_sysinit >/dev/null 2>&1
Specific enough? :)
pgp3OvCOFx0xa.pgp
Description: PGP signa
Hi Ingo,
I got the following printk when booting 2.6.23-rc7-mm1 :
BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES too low!
turning off the locking correctness validator.
Is it known/correct situation ?
Regards,
Mathieu
Here is my config.
#
# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
# Linux k
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 08:58 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > do_times passes an unitialized vfsmount into mnt_want_write. Here's
> > the quick fix (untested), but the right fix is to restructure the complete
> > mess do_utimes is (never let a libc developer write your kernel code.. :)):
>
> Cl
Balbir Singh wrote:
> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> Please, try with this patch too:
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
>> index c0fe71a..f599508 100644
>> --- a/fs/locks.c
>> +++ b/fs/locks.c
>> @@ -1423,7 +1423,7 @@ int generic_setlease(struct file *filp,
>> locks_copy_lock(new_fl, leas
There isn't a total_memory identifier within this function's scope. The
patch was compile/link tested.
Signed-off-by: Bob Picco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.23-rc7-mm1/arch/i
On 24/09/2007 7:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
- New git tree git-powerpc-galak.patch added to the -mm lineup: ppc32
things, mainly (Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
I'm observing a proble
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 09/24/2007 11:17 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
>
> Fine, but on some boots (I noticed this on rc6-mm1 too, but not before):
> :00:1a.7 EHCI: B
Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> putting Vlad in Cc:
>
> Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
>> I also get this compile error on s390. 'linux/scatterlist.h
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> Please, try with this patch too:
>
> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> index c0fe71a..f599508 100644
> --- a/fs/locks.c
> +++ b/fs/locks.c
> @@ -1423,7 +1423,7 @@ int generic_setlease(struct file *filp,
> locks_copy_lock(new_fl, lease);
> locks_insert_loc
Please, try with this patch too:
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index c0fe71a..f599508 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -1423,7 +1423,7 @@ int generic_setlease(struct file *filp,
locks_copy_lock(new_fl, lease);
locks_insert_lock(before, new_fl);
- *flp = f
the
same patch triggering this Bug.
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [events/0:15]
CPU 0:
Modules linked in:
Pid: 15, comm: events/0 Tainted: G D 2.6.23-rc7-mm1-autokern1 #1
RIP: 0010:[] []
__smp_call_function_mask+0x9a/0xc4
RSP: :8100017add80 EFLAGS: 0297
RAX
Please, try this:
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -1373,11 +1373,6 @@ int generic_setlease(struct file *filp, long arg, struct
file_lock **flp)
if (new_fl == NULL)
goto out;
- error = -ENOMEM;
- new_fl = locks_alloc_lock();
- if (new_fl == NULL)
-
putting Vlad in Cc:
Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
>
> I also get this compile error on s390. 'linux/scatterlist.h' has disappeared
> from the #include pil
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:05:08 BST, Christoph Hellwig said:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 06:35:50AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:17:16 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
> >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6
Andrew Morton wrote:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
I also get this compile error on s390. 'linux/scatterlist.h' has disappeared
from the #include pile but where ?
/home/clg/linux/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/net/sctp/auth.c
:
Pid: 18156, comm: fcntl23 Not tainted 2.6.23-rc7-mm1-autokern1 #1
RIP: 0010:[] [] fasync_helper+0x6b/0xe4
RSP: :810082bdfdb8 EFLAGS: 00010046
RAX: fff4 RBX: 8101821a9000 RCX:
RDX: 8101821a9000 RSI: 810180026900 RDI: 806286b8
RBP
.
I think this patch fixes it.
C.
Signed-off-by: Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/s390/mm/cmm.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index: 2.6.23-rc7-mm1/arch/s390/mm/cmm.c
===============
--- 2.6.23-rc7-mm1.orig/arch/s390
Andrew Morton wrote:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
/home/clg/linux/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c: In function
`dasd_eckd_build_cp':
/home/clg/linux/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c:1181: error:
Seeing the following from an older power LPAR, pretty sure we had
this in the previous -mm also:
Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x
Faulting instruction address: 0xc0047ac8
cpu 0x0: Vector: 300 (Data Access) at [c058f750]
pc: c0047ac8:
On 09/24/2007 11:17 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
Fine, but on some boots (I noticed this on rc6-mm1 too, but not before):
:00:1a.7 EHCI: BIOS handoff failed (BIOS bug ?) 01010001
:00:1d.7 EHCI: B
Getting compile errors on S390:
CC arch/s390/mm/cmm.o
arch/s390/mm/cmm.c: In function `cmm_init':
arch/s390/mm/cmm.c:431: error: implicit declaration of function
`register_oom_notifier'
arch/s390/mm/cmm.c:443: error: implicit declaration of function
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 06:35:50AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:17:16 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
>
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
>
> It lived fast, it died young, it didn'
Hi Andrew,
The kernel build fails with
CC arch/ia64/kernel/efi.o
arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c: In function 'efi_memmap_init':
arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c:1088: error: 'total_memory' undeclared (first use in
this function)
arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c:1088: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:17:16 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
>
>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
>
> It lived fast, it died young, it didn't leave a pretty corpse...
>
> Something in the
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:17:16 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
It lived fast, it died young, it didn't leave a pretty corpse...
Something in the startup scripts did a 'touch', and ker-blam.
[
Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
- New git tree git-powerpc-galak.patch added to the -mm lineup: ppc32
things, mainly (Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
Hi Andrew,
The link error for a PowerMac G5 (power
static void lock_and_coalesce_cpu_mnt_writer_counts(void)
{
int cpu;
struct mnt_writer *cpu_writer;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
cpu_writer = &per_cpu(mnt_writers, cpu);
spin_lock_nested(&cpu_writer->lock, 42);
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc7/2.6.23-rc7-mm1/
- New git tree git-powerpc-galak.patch added to the -mm lineup: ppc32
things, mainly (Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
Boilerplate:
- See the `hot-fixes' directory for any important upda
99 matches
Mail list logo
