On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:09:29 +0300 Mihai Donțu wrote:
> On Monday 24 September 2007, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > Have you tried to boot your kernel with
> >
> >video=radeonfb:noaccel
> >
> > I usual add this kernel parameter when running radeonfb and X.
> >
> > Otherwise I've observed the
On Monday 24 September 2007, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> Have you tried to boot your kernel with
>
>video=radeonfb:noaccel
>
> I usual add this kernel parameter when running radeonfb and X.
>
> Otherwise I've observed the same symptoms (e.g. with my radeon card
> at home: Radeon X300SE,
On Monday 24 September 2007, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
Have you tried to boot your kernel with
video=radeonfb:noaccel
I usual add this kernel parameter when running radeonfb and X.
Otherwise I've observed the same symptoms (e.g. with my radeon card
at home: Radeon X300SE, 1002:5b70).
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:09:29 +0300 Mihai Donțu wrote:
On Monday 24 September 2007, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
Have you tried to boot your kernel with
video=radeonfb:noaccel
I usual add this kernel parameter when running radeonfb and X.
Otherwise I've observed the same symptoms
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 07:27:59AM +0200, Mihai Donțu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today, out of curiosity, I pulled 2.6.23-rc7 (leave on the edge in a quiet
> weekend).
> Anyway, it seems that radeonfb and my:
> "01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc ATI Radeon XPRESS
> 200M 5955 (PCIE)"
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 07:27:59AM +0200, Mihai Donțu wrote:
Hi,
Today, out of curiosity, I pulled 2.6.23-rc7 (leave on the edge in a quiet
weekend).
Anyway, it seems that radeonfb and my:
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc ATI Radeon XPRESS
200M 5955 (PCIE)
don't
On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 23:31 +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> * Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:22:28 +0300
> * Organization: Home
>
> []
> >> >
> >> > So there, if one wants "ATI Radeon display support" on Radeon XPRESS
> >> > 200M with
> >> > X using radeon_drv.so, *should* put "Framebuffer Console
On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 22:22 +0300, Mihai Donțu wrote:
>
> Bottom line: no radeonfb for me :( at least, not now; but I have to
> be honest with
> you: I don't see what commit
> dd1447134454b169d5ae353aceb93f2368db8547 brought new
> into the picture. The previous radeonfb worked just great,
* Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:22:28 +0300
* Organization: Home
[]
>> >
>> > So there, if one wants "ATI Radeon display support" on Radeon XPRESS
>> > 200M with
>> > X using radeon_drv.so, *should* put "Framebuffer Console support" to N
>> > (if it's
>> > not already).
[]
> Bottom line: no
On Sunday 23 September 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 23 September 2007 20:31, Mihai Donțu wrote:
> > On Sunday 23 September 2007, Mihai Donțu wrote:
> > > I'll to do a full cleanup and start all over. I'm going to nail this
> > > thing down if
> > > it's the last thing I do! (so
On Sunday, 23 September 2007 20:31, Mihai Donțu wrote:
> On Sunday 23 September 2007, Mihai Donțu wrote:
> > I'll to do a full cleanup and start all over. I'm going to nail this thing
> > down if
> > it's the last thing I do! (so help me God) :)
>
> Found it!
>
> The problem was
On Sunday 23 September 2007, Mihai Donțu wrote:
> I'll to do a full cleanup and start all over. I'm going to nail this thing
> down if
> it's the last thing I do! (so help me God) :)
Found it!
The problem was "Framebuffer Console support". It was enabled by default in
older
configs (like
On Sunday 23 September 2007, Mihai Donțu wrote:
> On Sunday 23 September 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Heh, yup.
> >
> > There have been some radeonfb patches around -rc6 or so. Can you try
> > backing them out and letting us know if that helps a) ?
> >
> > In that case, Linus, we
On Sunday 23 September 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Heh, yup.
>
> There have been some radeonfb patches around -rc6 or so. Can you try
> backing them out and letting us know if that helps a) ?
>
> In that case, Linus, we probably want to revert them...
>
> Though looking at your PCI ID
On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 17:46 +0300, Mihai Donțu wrote:
> On Saturday 22 September 2007, Mihai Donțu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Today, out of curiosity, I pulled 2.6.23-rc7 (leave on the edge in a quiet
> > weekend).
> > Anyway, it seems that radeonfb and my:
> > "01:05.0 VGA compatible controller:
On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 17:46 +0300, Mihai Donțu wrote:
On Saturday 22 September 2007, Mihai Donțu wrote:
Hi,
Today, out of curiosity, I pulled 2.6.23-rc7 (leave on the edge in a quiet
weekend).
Anyway, it seems that radeonfb and my:
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI
On Sunday 23 September 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Heh, yup.
There have been some radeonfb patches around -rc6 or so. Can you try
backing them out and letting us know if that helps a) ?
In that case, Linus, we probably want to revert them...
Though looking at your PCI ID (5955),
On Sunday 23 September 2007, Mihai Donțu wrote:
On Sunday 23 September 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Heh, yup.
There have been some radeonfb patches around -rc6 or so. Can you try
backing them out and letting us know if that helps a) ?
In that case, Linus, we probably want to
On Sunday 23 September 2007, Mihai Donțu wrote:
I'll to do a full cleanup and start all over. I'm going to nail this thing
down if
it's the last thing I do! (so help me God) :)
Found it!
The problem was Framebuffer Console support. It was enabled by default in
older
configs (like
On Sunday, 23 September 2007 20:31, Mihai Donțu wrote:
On Sunday 23 September 2007, Mihai Donțu wrote:
I'll to do a full cleanup and start all over. I'm going to nail this thing
down if
it's the last thing I do! (so help me God) :)
Found it!
The problem was Framebuffer Console
On Sunday 23 September 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 23 September 2007 20:31, Mihai Donțu wrote:
On Sunday 23 September 2007, Mihai Donțu wrote:
I'll to do a full cleanup and start all over. I'm going to nail this
thing down if
it's the last thing I do! (so help me God) :)
* Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:22:28 +0300
* Organization: Home
[]
So there, if one wants ATI Radeon display support on Radeon XPRESS
200M with
X using radeon_drv.so, *should* put Framebuffer Console support to N
(if it's
not already).
[]
Bottom line: no radeonfb for me :( at
On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 22:22 +0300, Mihai Donțu wrote:
Bottom line: no radeonfb for me :( at least, not now; but I have to
be honest with
you: I don't see what commit
dd1447134454b169d5ae353aceb93f2368db8547 brought new
into the picture. The previous radeonfb worked just great, but
On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 23:31 +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
* Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:22:28 +0300
* Organization: Home
[]
So there, if one wants ATI Radeon display support on Radeon XPRESS
200M with
X using radeon_drv.so, *should* put Framebuffer Console support to N
(if it's
On Saturday 22 September 2007, Mihai Donțu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today, out of curiosity, I pulled 2.6.23-rc7 (leave on the edge in a quiet
> weekend).
> Anyway, it seems that radeonfb and my:
> "01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc ATI Radeon XPRESS
> 200M 5955 (PCIE)"
> don't
On Saturday 22 September 2007, Mihai Donțu wrote:
Hi,
Today, out of curiosity, I pulled 2.6.23-rc7 (leave on the edge in a quiet
weekend).
Anyway, it seems that radeonfb and my:
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc ATI Radeon XPRESS
200M 5955 (PCIE)
don't get along
Hi,
Today, out of curiosity, I pulled 2.6.23-rc7 (leave on the edge in a quiet
weekend).
Anyway, it seems that radeonfb and my:
"01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc ATI Radeon XPRESS 200M
5955 (PCIE)"
don't get along anymore, by:
a) X somehow fails to initialize the card and
Hi,
Today, out of curiosity, I pulled 2.6.23-rc7 (leave on the edge in a quiet
weekend).
Anyway, it seems that radeonfb and my:
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc ATI Radeon XPRESS 200M
5955 (PCIE)
don't get along anymore, by:
a) X somehow fails to initialize the card and
28 matches
Mail list logo
