* Alessandro Suardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ok, we just found the reason for the 8-way crash, the delta fix
> > > from Peter is below if any of you have tried the previous combo
> > > patch. Updated sched.git as well, new HEAD is
> > > fec13e45305d69fd0bd23b30bd05a0a42cf341f8.
> >
>
* Alessandro Suardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, we just found the reason for the 8-way crash, the delta fix
from Peter is below if any of you have tried the previous combo
patch. Updated sched.git as well, new HEAD is
fec13e45305d69fd0bd23b30bd05a0a42cf341f8.
With the
On Tuesday, 12 of February 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 00:12 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > no, they were not lost, they just didnt pass QA here
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 15:35 +0100, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2008 2:44 PM, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 00:12 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL
On Feb 12, 2008 2:44 PM, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 00:12 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > no, they were not lost, they just didnt pass
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 00:12 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > no, they were not lost, they just didnt pass QA here (they crashed on
> > > a particularly hard to debug 8-way box i have)
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 15:35 +0100, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 2:44 PM, Peter Zijlstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 00:12 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 2:44 PM, Peter Zijlstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 00:12 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no, they were not lost, they just didnt pass QA here (they crashed
On Feb 12, 2008 12:12 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > no, they were not lost, they just didnt pass QA here (they crashed on
> > > a particularly hard to debug 8-way box
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > no, they were not lost, they just didnt pass QA here (they crashed on
> > a particularly hard to debug 8-way box i have) and Peter worked on
> > that queue of fixes up until today to get it
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> no, they were not lost, they just didnt pass QA here (they crashed on
> a particularly hard to debug 8-way box i have) and Peter worked on
> that queue of fixes up until today to get it really correct. Could you
> check:
>
>
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 2.6.24-git1 is okay
> > > > 2.6.24-git2 is bad
>
> Ok, that's git ID's
>
>
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> > >
> > > 2.6.24-git1 is okay
> > > 2.6.24-git2 is bad
Ok, that's git ID's
b47711bfbcd4eb77ca61ef0162487b20e023ae55 2.6.24-git1
9b73e76f3cf63379dcf45fcd4f112f5812418d0a
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2008 6:10 PM, Alessandro Suardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I finally had a bit of time to try out different kernel versions to find
> > out where this began... and it's in 2.6.24-git2.
> >
> > What happens: Oracle 11g starts
On Feb 9, 2008 6:10 PM, Alessandro Suardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I finally had a bit of time to try out different kernel versions to find
> out where this began... and it's in 2.6.24-git2.
>
> What happens: Oracle 11g starts up and forks a number of so
> called background processes.
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
2.6.24-git1 is okay
2.6.24-git2 is bad
Ok, that's git ID's
b47711bfbcd4eb77ca61ef0162487b20e023ae55 2.6.24-git1
9b73e76f3cf63379dcf45fcd4f112f5812418d0a 2.6.24-git2
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
On Feb 9, 2008 6:10 PM, Alessandro Suardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I finally had a bit of time to try out different kernel versions to find
out where this began... and it's in 2.6.24-git2.
What happens: Oracle 11g starts up and
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no, they were not lost, they just didnt pass QA here (they crashed on
a particularly hard to debug 8-way box i have) and Peter worked on
that queue of fixes up until today to get it really
On Feb 12, 2008 12:12 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no, they were not lost, they just didnt pass QA here (they crashed on
a particularly hard to debug 8-way box i have) and Peter
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no, they were not lost, they just didnt pass QA here (they crashed on
a particularly hard to debug 8-way box i have) and Peter worked on
that queue of fixes up until today to get it really correct. Could you
check:
On Feb 9, 2008 6:10 PM, Alessandro Suardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I finally had a bit of time to try out different kernel versions to find
out where this began... and it's in 2.6.24-git2.
What happens: Oracle 11g starts up and forks a number of so
called background processes. Starting in
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
2.6.24-git1 is okay
2.6.24-git2 is bad
Ok, that's git ID's
b47711bfbcd4eb77ca61ef0162487b20e023ae55
22 matches
Mail list logo
