Thanks for the pointers, guys. It took a while for me to figure out what
got wrong to foul up UML, but the bug and fix are trivial (posting now).
Some of the testing I thought had got done clearly wasn't done, since
PTRACE_SETREGS was 100% busticated for 32-bit processes calling ptrace on
x86_64
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 06:20:23PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Bisected it down to
>
> good e7b5e11eaaa8ef93a34e68016de51152d0d62911
> bad bde6f5f59c2b2b48a7a849c129d5b48838fe77ee
>
> I strongly suspect it's one of the ptrace cleanup patches. Roland,
> could you please have a look?
I
> > > > - UML doesn't boot: guest is 2.6.24-mm1 also, haven't tried any
> > > >other. Same guest boots fine on 2.6.24 host.
> > >
> > > What does it do?
> >
> > See below.
>
> This bug seems to have made it to mainline as well, starting with
> -rc1. Any ideas? Should I start bisecting?
- UML doesn't boot: guest is 2.6.24-mm1 also, haven't tried any
other. Same guest boots fine on 2.6.24 host.
What does it do?
See below.
This bug seems to have made it to mainline as well, starting with
-rc1. Any ideas? Should I start bisecting?
Bisected it down to
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 06:20:23PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
Bisected it down to
good e7b5e11eaaa8ef93a34e68016de51152d0d62911
bad bde6f5f59c2b2b48a7a849c129d5b48838fe77ee
I strongly suspect it's one of the ptrace cleanup patches. Roland,
could you please have a look?
I agree.
Thanks for the pointers, guys. It took a while for me to figure out what
got wrong to foul up UML, but the bug and fix are trivial (posting now).
Some of the testing I thought had got done clearly wasn't done, since
PTRACE_SETREGS was 100% busticated for 32-bit processes calling ptrace on
x86_64
> > > - UML doesn't boot: guest is 2.6.24-mm1 also, haven't tried any
> > >other. Same guest boots fine on 2.6.24 host.
> >
> > What does it do?
>
> See below.
This bug seems to have made it to mainline as well, starting with
-rc1. Any ideas? Should I start bisecting?
Thanks,
Miklos
>
> > - strange key repeating (short press of a key results in lots of key
> >press events) when there's some sort of load (I/O?) I may have
> >seen this on non-mm kernels as well, but it's definitely more
> >noticable in -mm
>
> Do you have CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED enabled?, if so,
- strange key repeating (short press of a key results in lots of key
press events) when there's some sort of load (I/O?) I may have
seen this on non-mm kernels as well, but it's definitely more
noticable in -mm
Do you have CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED enabled?, if so, does
- UML doesn't boot: guest is 2.6.24-mm1 also, haven't tried any
other. Same guest boots fine on 2.6.24 host.
What does it do?
See below.
This bug seems to have made it to mainline as well, starting with
-rc1. Any ideas? Should I start bisecting?
Thanks,
Miklos
Any
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:52:04PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > What does it do?
> >
> > See below.
>
> > [0.42] Checking host MADV_REMOVE support...<3>MADV_REMOVE failed,
> > err = -38
>
> Where'd MADV_REMOVE go? I have it on 2.6.24.
Oh, I always get this message. Looking
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:52:04PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > What does it do?
>
> See below.
> [0.42] Checking host MADV_REMOVE support...<3>MADV_REMOVE failed, err
> = -38
Where'd MADV_REMOVE go? I have it on 2.6.24.
> [0.42] Failed to get registers from stub, errno =
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:46:55 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:43:45 +0100, Miklos Szeredi said:
> > I'm trying out 2.6.24-mm1 on my work laptop (T60), and generally it
>
> > - mounting isofs always results in an empty directory
>
> I hit this in 24-rc8-mm1, and bisected
On Friday 15 February 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > - UML doesn't boot: guest is 2.6.24-mm1 also, haven't tried any
> > >other. Same guest boots fine on 2.6.24 host.
> >
> > What does it do?
>
> See below.
>
> >
> > Any chance you can bisect it?
>
> It would be a bit painful,
> > - UML doesn't boot: guest is 2.6.24-mm1 also, haven't tried any
> >other. Same guest boots fine on 2.6.24 host.
>
> What does it do?
See below.
>
> Any chance you can bisect it?
It would be a bit painful, because this is the only machine I can use.
I much prefer bisecting UML
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:43:45PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> - UML doesn't boot: guest is 2.6.24-mm1 also, haven't tried any
>other. Same guest boots fine on 2.6.24 host.
What does it do?
Any chance you can bisect it?
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> the register dump looks OK as far as I can see. Since initialization
>> works OK and the adapter seems to be setup OK reading from the
>> register dump, I'm not sure at all what is going on.
>>
>> can you try manually ifup-ing the device and running tcpdump? do you
>> see
> the register dump looks OK as far as I can see. Since initialization
> works OK and the adapter seems to be setup OK reading from the
> register dump, I'm not sure at all what is going on.
>
> can you try manually ifup-ing the device and running tcpdump? do you
> see packets coming in?
Well it
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> OK. can you download, install and run `ethregs -i eth0` (from
>> e1000.sf.net) and send me the output? I'll compare with a known
>> working t60 I have here and see if anything shows up.
>
> OK, attached.
>
>> Also, post me the dmesg from after the adapter fails to load
And here's the NetworkManager side of the log:
==
Feb 15 12:27:30 tucsk NetworkManager: starting...
Feb 15 12:27:30 tucsk NetworkManager: [1203074850.429242]
nm_system_device_get_system_config(): found config
> OK. can you download, install and run `ethregs -i eth0` (from
> e1000.sf.net) and send me the output? I'll compare with a known
> working t60 I have here and see if anything shows up.
OK, attached.
> Also, post me the dmesg from after the adapter fails to load
> properly.
Hmm, nothing in
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>>> - network doesn't always come up at first try (e1000e). On 2.6.24
>>>e1000e doesn't seem to work at all, so I use e1000, but that has
>>>other problems.
>
> It does seem to be using MSI interrupts:
>
>CPU0 CPU1
> 0:2994380 1
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:43:45 +0100, Miklos Szeredi said:
> I'm trying out 2.6.24-mm1 on my work laptop (T60), and generally it
> - mounting isofs always results in an empty directory
I hit this in 24-rc8-mm1, and bisected it down to
iget-stop-isofs-from-using-read_inode-fix-2.patch
Apparently
Kok, Auke wrote:
> Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> - network doesn't always come up at first try (e1000e). On 2.6.24
>>e1000e doesn't seem to work at all, so I use e1000, but that has
>>other problems.
>
> Andy Gospodarek pointed out a possible problem with e1000e if you are not
> using
> MSI
> > - network doesn't always come up at first try (e1000e). On 2.6.24
> >e1000e doesn't seem to work at all, so I use e1000, but that has
> >other problems.
>
> Andy Gospodarek pointed out a possible problem with e1000e if you
> are not using MSI interrupts (e.g. booting with pci=nomsi
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> - network doesn't always come up at first try (e1000e). On 2.6.24
>e1000e doesn't seem to work at all, so I use e1000, but that has
>other problems.
Andy Gospodarek pointed out a possible problem with e1000e if you are not using
MSI interrupts (e.g. booting with
> On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 12:43 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>
> > - strange key repeating (short press of a key results in lots of key
> >press events) when there's some sort of load (I/O?) I may have
> >seen this on non-mm kernels as well, but it's definitely more
> >noticable in
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 12:43 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> - strange key repeating (short press of a key results in lots of key
>press events) when there's some sort of load (I/O?) I may have
>seen this on non-mm kernels as well, but it's definitely more
>noticable in -mm
Do you
I'm trying out 2.6.24-mm1 on my work laptop (T60), and generally it
works surprisingly well (including suspend/resume), with only a few
minor issues. If these are not known/fixed already, I'll send out
proper bug reports to the relevant people:
- UML doesn't boot: guest is 2.6.24-mm1 also,
I'm trying out 2.6.24-mm1 on my work laptop (T60), and generally it
works surprisingly well (including suspend/resume), with only a few
minor issues. If these are not known/fixed already, I'll send out
proper bug reports to the relevant people:
- UML doesn't boot: guest is 2.6.24-mm1 also,
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 12:43 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
- strange key repeating (short press of a key results in lots of key
press events) when there's some sort of load (I/O?) I may have
seen this on non-mm kernels as well, but it's definitely more
noticable in -mm
Do
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 12:43 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
- strange key repeating (short press of a key results in lots of key
press events) when there's some sort of load (I/O?) I may have
seen this on non-mm kernels as well, but it's definitely more
noticable in -mm
Do you have
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
- network doesn't always come up at first try (e1000e). On 2.6.24
e1000e doesn't seem to work at all, so I use e1000, but that has
other problems.
Andy Gospodarek pointed out a possible problem with e1000e if you are not using
MSI interrupts (e.g. booting with
- network doesn't always come up at first try (e1000e). On 2.6.24
e1000e doesn't seem to work at all, so I use e1000, but that has
other problems.
Andy Gospodarek pointed out a possible problem with e1000e if you
are not using MSI interrupts (e.g. booting with pci=nomsi or
Kok, Auke wrote:
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
- network doesn't always come up at first try (e1000e). On 2.6.24
e1000e doesn't seem to work at all, so I use e1000, but that has
other problems.
Andy Gospodarek pointed out a possible problem with e1000e if you are not
using
MSI interrupts
OK. can you download, install and run `ethregs -i eth0` (from
e1000.sf.net) and send me the output? I'll compare with a known
working t60 I have here and see if anything shows up.
OK, attached.
Also, post me the dmesg from after the adapter fails to load
properly.
Hmm, nothing in dmesg.
the register dump looks OK as far as I can see. Since initialization
works OK and the adapter seems to be setup OK reading from the
register dump, I'm not sure at all what is going on.
can you try manually ifup-ing the device and running tcpdump? do you
see packets coming in?
Well it does
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
the register dump looks OK as far as I can see. Since initialization
works OK and the adapter seems to be setup OK reading from the
register dump, I'm not sure at all what is going on.
can you try manually ifup-ing the device and running tcpdump? do you
see packets
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
OK. can you download, install and run `ethregs -i eth0` (from
e1000.sf.net) and send me the output? I'll compare with a known
working t60 I have here and see if anything shows up.
OK, attached.
Also, post me the dmesg from after the adapter fails to load
properly.
And here's the NetworkManager side of the log:
==
Feb 15 12:27:30 tucsk NetworkManager: info starting...
Feb 15 12:27:30 tucsk NetworkManager: debug [1203074850.429242]
nm_system_device_get_system_config(): found config
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:43:45PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
- UML doesn't boot: guest is 2.6.24-mm1 also, haven't tried any
other. Same guest boots fine on 2.6.24 host.
What does it do?
Any chance you can bisect it?
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at
- UML doesn't boot: guest is 2.6.24-mm1 also, haven't tried any
other. Same guest boots fine on 2.6.24 host.
What does it do?
See below.
Any chance you can bisect it?
It would be a bit painful, because this is the only machine I can use.
I much prefer bisecting UML kernels :)
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:43:45 +0100, Miklos Szeredi said:
I'm trying out 2.6.24-mm1 on my work laptop (T60), and generally it
- mounting isofs always results in an empty directory
I hit this in 24-rc8-mm1, and bisected it down to
iget-stop-isofs-from-using-read_inode-fix-2.patch
Apparently it
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
- network doesn't always come up at first try (e1000e). On 2.6.24
e1000e doesn't seem to work at all, so I use e1000, but that has
other problems.
It does seem to be using MSI interrupts:
CPU0 CPU1
0:2994380 1 IO-APIC-edge
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:52:04PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
What does it do?
See below.
[0.42] Checking host MADV_REMOVE support...3MADV_REMOVE failed,
err = -38
Where'd MADV_REMOVE go? I have it on 2.6.24.
Oh, I always get this message. Looking closer, this only
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:52:04PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
What does it do?
See below.
[0.42] Checking host MADV_REMOVE support...3MADV_REMOVE failed, err
= -38
Where'd MADV_REMOVE go? I have it on 2.6.24.
[0.42] Failed to get registers from stub, errno = 3
[
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:46:55 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:43:45 +0100, Miklos Szeredi said:
I'm trying out 2.6.24-mm1 on my work laptop (T60), and generally it
- mounting isofs always results in an empty directory
I hit this in 24-rc8-mm1, and bisected it down
On Friday 15 February 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
- UML doesn't boot: guest is 2.6.24-mm1 also, haven't tried any
other. Same guest boots fine on 2.6.24 host.
What does it do?
See below.
Any chance you can bisect it?
It would be a bit painful, because this is the only
48 matches
Mail list logo
