On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 03:07:46PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 01:08:38PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > Personally I'd prefer it to only grow a struct stat or rather it's members
> > > But the nfsd code currently expects a dentry so this might require some
> > >
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 01:08:38PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > Personally I'd prefer it to only grow a struct stat or rather it's members
> > But the nfsd code currently expects a dentry so this might require some
> > major refactoring.
>
> Well, we need to check for mountpoints, for
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 01:08:38PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
Personally I'd prefer it to only grow a struct stat or rather it's members
But the nfsd code currently expects a dentry so this might require some
major refactoring.
Well, we need to check for mountpoints, for example, so I
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 03:07:46PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 01:08:38PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
Personally I'd prefer it to only grow a struct stat or rather it's members
But the nfsd code currently expects a dentry so this might require some
major
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
I wonder why so few people are seeing this, I'd have assumed that
NFSv3 && XFS is not sooo exotic...
Still on 2.6.23.x here (also use nfsv3 + xfs).
So, it's the "too few people are testing -rc kernels" issue again :(
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #118:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007, Christian Kujau wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
Oops, I meant it for NFSD... and I'm somewhat serious. I'm not
saying it's a good long term solution, but a potentially safer
short-term workaround.
I've opened
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
Oops, I meant it for NFSD... and I'm somewhat serious. I'm not
saying it's a good long term solution, but a potentially safer
short-term workaround.
I've opened http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9400 to track this
one (and to not forget
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
Oops, I meant it for NFSD... and I'm somewhat serious. I'm not
saying it's a good long term solution, but a potentially safer
short-term workaround.
I've opened http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9400 to track this
one (and to not forget
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007, Christian Kujau wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
Oops, I meant it for NFSD... and I'm somewhat serious. I'm not
saying it's a good long term solution, but a potentially safer
short-term workaround.
I've opened
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
I wonder why so few people are seeing this, I'd have assumed that
NFSv3 XFS is not sooo exotic...
Still on 2.6.23.x here (also use nfsv3 + xfs).
So, it's the too few people are testing -rc kernels issue again :(
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #118:
the
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 09:19:32AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Very funny, but disabling XFS on the client won't help.
Oops, I meant it for NFSD... and I'm somewhat serious. I'm not
saying it's a good long term solution, but a potentially safer
short-term workaround.
-
To unsubscribe from
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 03:03 -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:17:17AM +0100, Christian Kujau wrote:
>
> > OK, I'll try this. I hope this can be fixed somehow before 2.6.24...
>
> Well, one simple nasty idea would be something like:
>
> diff --git a/fs/Kconfig
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:17:17AM +0100, Christian Kujau wrote:
> OK, I'll try this. I hope this can be fixed somehow before 2.6.24...
Well, one simple nasty idea would be something like:
diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
index 429a002..da231fd 100644
--- a/fs/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/Kconfig
@@
On Fri, November 16, 2007 01:34, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> I'm not sure what you're doing here, but a viable work-around for now
> might be to use nfsv2 mounts, something like
>
> mount -o vers=2 ...
> or to keep v3 and disable readdirplus doing something like:
> mount -o vers=3,nordirplus ...
OK,
On Fri, November 16, 2007 01:34, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
I'm not sure what you're doing here, but a viable work-around for now
might be to use nfsv2 mounts, something like
mount -o vers=2 ...
or to keep v3 and disable readdirplus doing something like:
mount -o vers=3,nordirplus ...
OK, I'll
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:17:17AM +0100, Christian Kujau wrote:
OK, I'll try this. I hope this can be fixed somehow before 2.6.24...
Well, one simple nasty idea would be something like:
diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
index 429a002..da231fd 100644
--- a/fs/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/Kconfig
@@
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 03:03 -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:17:17AM +0100, Christian Kujau wrote:
OK, I'll try this. I hope this can be fixed somehow before 2.6.24...
Well, one simple nasty idea would be something like:
diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 09:19:32AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
Very funny, but disabling XFS on the client won't help.
Oops, I meant it for NFSD... and I'm somewhat serious. I'm not
saying it's a good long term solution, but a potentially safer
short-term workaround.
-
To unsubscribe from
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 08:51:36AM +0100, Christian Kujau wrote:
> [] mutex_lock_nested+0xcc/0x2c0
> [] do_lookup+0xa4/0x190
> [] __link_path_walk+0x749/0xd10
> [] link_path_walk+0x44/0xc0
> [] path_walk+0x18/0x20
> [] do_path_lookup+0x78/0x1c0
> [] __user_walk_fd+0x38/0x60
> []
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Christian Kujau wrote:
Upon accessing the /data/sub part of the CIFS share, the client hung, waiting
for the server to respond (the [cifs] kernel thread on the client was
spinning, waiting for i/o). On the server, similar things as with the nfsd
processes happened
Turns
On Thu, November 15, 2007 08:51, Christian Kujau wrote:
> Since NFS was not working (the nfsd processes were already in D state),
> to mount a CIFS share from the very same server (and the same client).
That should read:
Since NFS was not working (the nfsd processes were already in D state), I
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Christian Kujau wrote:
Yes, the nfsd process only got stuck when I did ls(1) (with or without -l) on
a NFS share which contained a XFS partition.
Since NFS was not working (the nfsd processes were already in D state), to
mount a CIFS share from the very same server (and
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Christian Kujau wrote:
Yes, the nfsd process only got stuck when I did ls(1) (with or without -l) on
a NFS share which contained a XFS partition.
Since NFS was not working (the nfsd processes were already in D state), to
mount a CIFS share from the very same server (and
On Thu, November 15, 2007 08:51, Christian Kujau wrote:
Since NFS was not working (the nfsd processes were already in D state),
to mount a CIFS share from the very same server (and the same client).
That should read:
Since NFS was not working (the nfsd processes were already in D state), I
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Christian Kujau wrote:
Upon accessing the /data/sub part of the CIFS share, the client hung, waiting
for the server to respond (the [cifs] kernel thread on the client was
spinning, waiting for i/o). On the server, similar things as with the nfsd
processes happened
Turns
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 08:51:36AM +0100, Christian Kujau wrote:
[c040914c] mutex_lock_nested+0xcc/0x2c0
[c016dc64] do_lookup+0xa4/0x190
[c016f6f9] __link_path_walk+0x749/0xd10
[c016fd04] link_path_walk+0x44/0xc0
[c016fd98] path_walk+0x18/0x20
[c016ff98] do_path_lookup+0x78/0x1c0
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
After some bisection pain (sg broken in the middle and XFS not
compiling in other places) the regression seems to be:
commit 051e7cd44ab8f0f7c2958371485b4a1ff64a8d1b
Author: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue Aug 28 13:58:24
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:43:40AM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
I wonder if this is a similar hang to what Christian was seeing here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/13/319
Ah, thanks for noticing that. Christian Kujau, is /data an xfs
partition?
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:02:41PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:53:22PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 05:44:19PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:39:22PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > > This must have
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:53:22PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 05:44:19PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:39:22PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > This must have come up before; feel free to remind me: is there any way
> > > to make the
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 05:44:19PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:39:22PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > This must have come up before; feel free to remind me: is there any way
> > to make the interface easier to use? (E.g. would it help if the filldir
> >
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:39:22PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> This must have come up before; feel free to remind me: is there any way
> to make the interface easier to use? (E.g. would it help if the filldir
> callback could be passed a dentry?)
The best thing for the filesystem would be to
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 03:29:52PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:04:00PM -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> > With 2.6.24-rc2 (amd64) I sometimes (usually but perhaps not always)
> > see a hang when accessing some NFS exported XFS filesystems. Local
> > access to these
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:04:00PM -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> With 2.6.24-rc2 (amd64) I sometimes (usually but perhaps not always)
> see a hang when accessing some NFS exported XFS filesystems. Local
> access to these filesystems ahead of time works without problems.
>
> This does not occur
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:43:40AM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
> I wonder if this is a similar hang to what Christian was seeing here:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/13/319
Ah, thanks for noticing that. Christian Kujau, is /data an xfs
partition? There are a bunch of xfs commits in
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:04:00PM -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> With 2.6.24-rc2 (amd64) I sometimes (usually but perhaps not always)
> see a hang when accessing some NFS exported XFS filesystems. Local
> access to these filesystems ahead of time works without problems.
>
> This does not occur
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:04:00PM -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
With 2.6.24-rc2 (amd64) I sometimes (usually but perhaps not always)
see a hang when accessing some NFS exported XFS filesystems. Local
access to these filesystems ahead of time works without problems.
This does not occur with
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:43:40AM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
I wonder if this is a similar hang to what Christian was seeing here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/13/319
Ah, thanks for noticing that. Christian Kujau, is /data an xfs
partition? There are a bunch of xfs commits in
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:04:00PM -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
With 2.6.24-rc2 (amd64) I sometimes (usually but perhaps not always)
see a hang when accessing some NFS exported XFS filesystems. Local
access to these filesystems ahead of time works without problems.
This does not occur with
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 03:29:52PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:04:00PM -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
With 2.6.24-rc2 (amd64) I sometimes (usually but perhaps not always)
see a hang when accessing some NFS exported XFS filesystems. Local
access to these
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:39:22PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
This must have come up before; feel free to remind me: is there any way
to make the interface easier to use? (E.g. would it help if the filldir
callback could be passed a dentry?)
The best thing for the filesystem would be to
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:53:22PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 05:44:19PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:39:22PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
This must have come up before; feel free to remind me: is there any way
to make the
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 05:44:19PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:39:22PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
This must have come up before; feel free to remind me: is there any way
to make the interface easier to use? (E.g. would it help if the filldir
callback could
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:02:41PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:53:22PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 05:44:19PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:39:22PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
This must have come up
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:43:40AM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
I wonder if this is a similar hang to what Christian was seeing here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/13/319
Ah, thanks for noticing that. Christian Kujau, is /data an xfs
partition?
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
After some bisection pain (sg broken in the middle and XFS not
compiling in other places) the regression seems to be:
commit 051e7cd44ab8f0f7c2958371485b4a1ff64a8d1b
Author: Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Aug 28 13:58:24 2007
I wonder if this is a similar hang to what Christian was seeing here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/13/319
Benny
On Nov. 14, 2007, 9:04 +0200, Chris Wedgwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With 2.6.24-rc2 (amd64) I sometimes (usually but perhaps not always)
> see a hang when accessing some NFS
With 2.6.24-rc2 (amd64) I sometimes (usually but perhaps not always)
see a hang when accessing some NFS exported XFS filesystems. Local
access to these filesystems ahead of time works without problems.
This does not occur with 2.6.23.1. The filesystem does not appear to
be corrupt.
The call
With 2.6.24-rc2 (amd64) I sometimes (usually but perhaps not always)
see a hang when accessing some NFS exported XFS filesystems. Local
access to these filesystems ahead of time works without problems.
This does not occur with 2.6.23.1. The filesystem does not appear to
be corrupt.
The call
I wonder if this is a similar hang to what Christian was seeing here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/13/319
Benny
On Nov. 14, 2007, 9:04 +0200, Chris Wedgwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With 2.6.24-rc2 (amd64) I sometimes (usually but perhaps not always)
see a hang when accessing some NFS exported
50 matches
Mail list logo
