Takashi Iwai wrote:
Linus, please revert the commit 57a04513cb3 as now.
The life can go well without this patch.
hda_intel.c works for me in rc8.
Many thanx to all
Harri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 05:08:45 Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:03:22 -0500,
>
> Daniel Hazelton wrote:
> > On Monday 14 January 2008 06:04:20 Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > Could this have anything to do with the following messages I've seen
> > > > when trying -rc7 ?
> > >
At Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:03:22 -0500,
Daniel Hazelton wrote:
>
> On Monday 14 January 2008 06:04:20 Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Could this have anything to do with the following messages I've seen when
> > > trying -rc7 ?
> > >
> > > [7.760269] pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of mem
At Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:46:58 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Dear Takashi-san,
>
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >
> > The "regression" was your original problem, no sound on rc7, which was
> > fixed by reverting the patch. Now I'd like to know that my new patch
> > doesn't break after reverting the
At Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:03:22 -0500,
Daniel Hazelton wrote:
On Monday 14 January 2008 06:04:20 Takashi Iwai wrote:
snip
Could this have anything to do with the following messages I've seen when
trying -rc7 ?
[7.760269] pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of mem resources: 12
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 05:08:45 Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:03:22 -0500,
Daniel Hazelton wrote:
On Monday 14 January 2008 06:04:20 Takashi Iwai wrote:
snip
Could this have anything to do with the following messages I've seen
when trying -rc7 ?
[
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Linus, please revert the commit 57a04513cb3 as now.
The life can go well without this patch.
hda_intel.c works for me in rc8.
Many thanx to all
Harri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Takashi-san,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
The "regression" was your original problem, no sound on rc7, which was
fixed by reverting the patch. Now I'd like to know that my new patch
doesn't break after reverting the broken patch.
Seems that there was some misunderstanding: I thought your patch
At Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:11:20 -0500,
Daniel Hazelton wrote:
>
> On Saturday 12 January 2008 04:41:21 Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:02:53 +0100,
> > >
> > > Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > >> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > >>> Hm... Just to be sure, try the patch
At Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:11:20 -0500,
Daniel Hazelton wrote:
On Saturday 12 January 2008 04:41:21 Harald Dunkel wrote:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:02:53 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Hm... Just to be sure, try the patch below. It's a clean up
Dear Takashi-san,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
The regression was your original problem, no sound on rc7, which was
fixed by reverting the patch. Now I'd like to know that my new patch
doesn't break after reverting the broken patch.
Seems that there was some misunderstanding: I thought your patch
At Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:41:21 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:02:53 +0100,
> > Harald Dunkel wrote:
> >> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>> Hm... Just to be sure, try the patch below. It's a clean up patch
> >>> that I'd like to apply later.
> >>>
> >>
At Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:55:28 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:02:53 +0100,
> > Harald Dunkel wrote:
> >> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>> Hm... Just to be sure, try the patch below. It's a clean up patch
> >>> that I'd like to apply later.
> >>>
> >>
At Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:55:28 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:02:53 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Hm... Just to be sure, try the patch below. It's a clean up patch
that I'd like to apply later.
Sorry, no sound.
OK, but
At Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:41:21 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:02:53 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Hm... Just to be sure, try the patch below. It's a clean up patch
that I'd like to apply later.
Sorry, no sound.
OK, but
On Saturday 12 January 2008 04:41:21 Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:02:53 +0100,
> >
> > Harald Dunkel wrote:
> >> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>> Hm... Just to be sure, try the patch below. It's a clean up patch
> >>> that I'd like to apply later.
> >>
> >>
Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:02:53 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Hm... Just to be sure, try the patch below. It's a clean up patch
that I'd like to apply later.
Sorry, no sound.
OK, but I'd like to know whether this makes no regression to rc6.
Could you
Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:02:53 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Hm... Just to be sure, try the patch below. It's a clean up patch
that I'd like to apply later.
Sorry, no sound.
OK, but I'd like to know whether this makes no regression to rc6.
Could you
On Saturday 12 January 2008 04:41:21 Harald Dunkel wrote:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:02:53 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Hm... Just to be sure, try the patch below. It's a clean up patch
that I'd like to apply later.
Sorry, no sound.
OK, but
Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:02:53 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Hm... Just to be sure, try the patch below. It's a clean up patch
that I'd like to apply later.
Sorry, no sound.
OK, but I'd like to know whether this makes no regression to rc6.
Could you
Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:02:53 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Hm... Just to be sure, try the patch below. It's a clean up patch
that I'd like to apply later.
Sorry, no sound.
OK, but I'd like to know whether this makes no regression to rc6.
Could you
At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:02:53 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >
> > Hm... Just to be sure, try the patch below. It's a clean up patch
> > that I'd like to apply later.
> >
>
> Sorry, no sound.
OK, but I'd like to know whether this makes no regression to rc6.
Could you
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Hm... Just to be sure, try the patch below. It's a clean up patch
that I'd like to apply later.
Sorry, no sound.
The perex/alsa.git mm branch on kernel.org has many fixes. Could you
give it a try, too?
This version seems to work. But AFAICS it just reverts
At Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:10:41 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >
> > Thanks. Then the possible reason might be the registers that don't
> > appear in this proc output, such as GPIO.
> > Could you try the patch below with the latency patch (you reverted) in
> > rc7?
> >
>
>
At Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:10:41 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Thanks. Then the possible reason might be the registers that don't
appear in this proc output, such as GPIO.
Could you try the patch below with the latency patch (you reverted) in
rc7?
Using rc7:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Hm... Just to be sure, try the patch below. It's a clean up patch
that I'd like to apply later.
Sorry, no sound.
The perex/alsa.git mm branch on kernel.org has many fixes. Could you
give it a try, too?
This version seems to work. But AFAICS it just reverts
At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:02:53 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Hm... Just to be sure, try the patch below. It's a clean up patch
that I'd like to apply later.
Sorry, no sound.
OK, but I'd like to know whether this makes no regression to rc6.
Could you check?
Also,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Thanks. Then the possible reason might be the registers that don't
appear in this proc output, such as GPIO.
Could you try the patch below with the latency patch (you reverted) in
rc7?
Using rc7:
hda_intel.c(rc6) + patch for sigmatel.c: sound works
hda_intel.c(rc7)
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Thanks. Then the possible reason might be the registers that don't
appear in this proc output, such as GPIO.
Could you try the patch below with the latency patch (you reverted) in
rc7?
Using rc7:
hda_intel.c(rc6) + patch for sigmatel.c: sound works
hda_intel.c(rc7)
At Wed, 09 Jan 2008 07:03:18 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >
> > Did you enable CONFIG_SND_HDA_POWER_SAVE feature? And which hardware
> > (laptop, product name, whatever) exactly?
> >
>
> CONFIG_SND_HDA_POWER_SAVE is not set.
That's fine.
> Hardware is a Dell XPS
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Did you enable CONFIG_SND_HDA_POWER_SAVE feature? And which hardware
(laptop, product name, whatever) exactly?
CONFIG_SND_HDA_POWER_SAVE is not set.
Hardware is a Dell XPS M1330. CPU is Core2 Duo T7500, 2.20GHz,
2 GByte RAM. lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel
At Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:01:48 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Dear Takashi-san,
>
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >
> > Could you revert it and check whether the problem still exists?
> >
>
> I did, and sound is back :-).
Wow, you are the first bug reporter regarding this patch.
Linus, please revert
Dear Takashi-san,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Could you revert it and check whether the problem still exists?
I did, and sound is back :-).
Please mail, if you need the .config file. BTW, I missed to send
the output of uname. Here is:
Linux daffy 2.6.24-rc7 #1 SMP Tue Jan 8 07:17:39 CET 2008
* Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The only difference between rc6 and rc7 in sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c is
> > this:
> >
> > diff -ur linux-2.6.24-rc6/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> > linux-2.6.24-rc7/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> > --- linux-2.6.24-rc6/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
* Takashi Iwai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only difference between rc6 and rc7 in sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c is
this:
diff -ur linux-2.6.24-rc6/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
linux-2.6.24-rc7/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c 2007-12-21
Dear Takashi-san,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Could you revert it and check whether the problem still exists?
I did, and sound is back :-).
Please mail, if you need the .config file. BTW, I missed to send
the output of uname. Here is:
Linux daffy 2.6.24-rc7 #1 SMP Tue Jan 8 07:17:39 CET 2008
At Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:01:48 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Dear Takashi-san,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Could you revert it and check whether the problem still exists?
I did, and sound is back :-).
Wow, you are the first bug reporter regarding this patch.
Linus, please revert the commit
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Did you enable CONFIG_SND_HDA_POWER_SAVE feature? And which hardware
(laptop, product name, whatever) exactly?
CONFIG_SND_HDA_POWER_SAVE is not set.
Hardware is a Dell XPS M1330. CPU is Core2 Duo T7500, 2.20GHz,
2 GByte RAM. lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel
At Wed, 09 Jan 2008 07:03:18 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Takashi Iwai wrote:
Did you enable CONFIG_SND_HDA_POWER_SAVE feature? And which hardware
(laptop, product name, whatever) exactly?
CONFIG_SND_HDA_POWER_SAVE is not set.
That's fine.
Hardware is a Dell XPS M1330. CPU is
At Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:53:33 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Upgrading from 2.6.24-rc6 to rc7 Alsa stopped working for me. I still
> can access /dev/dsp, change the volume and so on, but the speakers
> are quiet. Moving back to rc6 there is no such problem.
>
> Of course the
Hi folks,
Upgrading from 2.6.24-rc6 to rc7 Alsa stopped working for me. I still
can access /dev/dsp, change the volume and so on, but the speakers
are quiet. Moving back to rc6 there is no such problem.
Of course the config files are the same (except for some new
CONFIG_SLABINFO variable).
Hi folks,
Upgrading from 2.6.24-rc6 to rc7 Alsa stopped working for me. I still
can access /dev/dsp, change the volume and so on, but the speakers
are quiet. Moving back to rc6 there is no such problem.
Of course the config files are the same (except for some new
CONFIG_SLABINFO variable).
At Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:53:33 +0100,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
Upgrading from 2.6.24-rc6 to rc7 Alsa stopped working for me. I still
can access /dev/dsp, change the volume and so on, but the speakers
are quiet. Moving back to rc6 there is no such problem.
Of course the config files
43 matches
Mail list logo
