On 2014-04-16 20:32, Zhang Rui wrote:
On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 02:05 +0200, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-04-11 00:51, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-04-07 13:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, April 07, 2014 01:17:51 AM Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-04-06 04:43, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 04/05/
On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 02:05 +0200, Manuel Krause wrote:
> On 2014-04-11 00:51, Manuel Krause wrote:
> > On 2014-04-07 13:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Monday, April 07, 2014 01:17:51 AM Manuel Krause wrote:
> >>> On 2014-04-06 04:43, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 04/05/2014 07:37 PM, Manuel
On 2014-04-11 00:51, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-04-07 13:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, April 07, 2014 01:17:51 AM Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-04-06 04:43, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 04/05/2014 07:37 PM, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-04-01 01:47, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 03/31/2014 04
On 2014-04-07 13:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, April 07, 2014 01:17:51 AM Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-04-06 04:43, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 04/05/2014 07:37 PM, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-04-01 01:47, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 03/31/2014 04:37 PM, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-20
On Monday, April 07, 2014 01:17:51 AM Manuel Krause wrote:
> On 2014-04-06 04:43, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 04/05/2014 07:37 PM, Manuel Krause wrote:
> >> On 2014-04-01 01:47, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>> On 03/31/2014 04:37 PM, Manuel Krause wrote:
> On 2014-03-20 21:21, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-04-06 04:43, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 04/05/2014 07:37 PM, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-04-01 01:47, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 03/31/2014 04:37 PM, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-20 21:21, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-11 22:59, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-10 02:49, Manuel Krause
On 04/05/2014 07:37 PM, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-04-01 01:47, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 03/31/2014 04:37 PM, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-20 21:21, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-11 22:59, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-10 02:49, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-09 18:58, Rafael J. Wys
On 2014-04-01 01:47, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 03/31/2014 04:37 PM, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-20 21:21, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-11 22:59, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-10 02:49, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-09 18:58, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, March 09, 2014 01:10:2
On 03/31/2014 04:37 PM, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-20 21:21, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-11 22:59, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-10 02:49, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-09 18:58, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, March 09, 2014 01:10:25 AM Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-08 16
On 2014-03-20 21:21, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-11 22:59, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-10 02:49, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-09 18:58, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, March 09, 2014 01:10:25 AM Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-08 16:59, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 03/08/2014 03:08
On 2014-03-10 02:49, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-09 18:58, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, March 09, 2014 01:10:25 AM Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-08 16:59, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 03/08/2014 03:08 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 14:52:30 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On
On 2014-03-09 18:58, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, March 09, 2014 01:10:25 AM Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-08 16:59, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 03/08/2014 03:08 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 14:52:30 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 11:04:29PM +0100, Manu
On Sunday, March 09, 2014 01:10:25 AM Manuel Krause wrote:
> On 2014-03-08 16:59, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 03/08/2014 03:08 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> >> On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 14:52:30 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 11:04:29PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
> Hi, and tha
On 03/08/2014 04:10 PM, Manuel Krause wrote:
On 2014-03-08 16:59, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 03/08/2014 03:08 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 14:52:30 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 11:04:29PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
Hi, and thanks for the quick response!
No s
On 2014-03-08 16:59, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 03/08/2014 03:08 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 14:52:30 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 11:04:29PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
Hi, and thanks for the quick response!
No special fancy "fan control policy". 'fancontrol
On 03/08/2014 03:08 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 14:52:30 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 11:04:29PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
Hi, and thanks for the quick response!
No special fancy "fan control policy". 'fancontrol' isn't up or
running.
Vanilla kernels 3.11
On Saturday, March 08, 2014 12:08:31 PM Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 14:52:30 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 11:04:29PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
> > > Hi, and thanks for the quick response!
> > > No special fancy "fan control policy". 'fancontrol' isn't up or
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 14:52:30 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 11:04:29PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
> > Hi, and thanks for the quick response!
> > No special fancy "fan control policy". 'fancontrol' isn't up or
> > running.
> > Vanilla kernels 3.11.* and 3.12.* had been working
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 11:04:29PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
> On 2014-03-07 21:55, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:33:02PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
> >>Please have a short look at the following BUG report + the comments
> >>-- this message here is a kind of FWD-ing it:
> >>
On 2014-03-07 21:55, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:33:02PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
Please have a short look at the following BUG report + the comments
-- this message here is a kind of FWD-ing it:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/39005
I came late to test kernel 3.13 with t
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:33:02PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
> Please have a short look at the following BUG report + the comments
> -- this message here is a kind of FWD-ing it:
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/39005
>
> I came late to test kernel 3.13 with the .5 one, as it was the time
> tha
Please have a short look at the following BUG report + the
comments -- this message here is a kind of FWD-ing it:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/39005
I came late to test kernel 3.13 with the .5 one, as it was the
time that the related -CK/BFS patch became available.
I'm not using Archlinux,
22 matches
Mail list logo
