On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> > > I have a bunch of computers with 8139 cards. When I moved the cables
> > > over from my hub to my new switch all the "full duplex" lights came on
> > > immediately.
> > >
> > > Would
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> James Sutherland wrote:
> > > That would explain me seeing way too many collisions on that old hub
> > > (which obviously doesn't support full-duplex).
> >
> > No, it would just prevent your card working. Large numbers of collisions
> > are normal
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 10:40:53AM +0100, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> Why would it completely "not work"?
experience maybe. telnet works just fine. a copy would end in a _very_
slow transfer. and if I say slow, I mean a few kbytes/sec. depends on
the number of colls as well.
besides, what gains are
> Would this mean that the driver/card already were in full-duplex? That
> would explain me seeing way too many collisions on that old hub (which
> obviously doesn't support full-duplex).
Most likely it means they were set to autonegotiate
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> > I have a bunch of computers with 8139 cards. When I moved the cables
> > over from my hub to my new switch all the "full duplex" lights came on
> > immediately.
> >
> > Would this mean that the driver/card already were in
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> I have a bunch of computers with 8139 cards. When I moved the cables
> over from my hub to my new switch all the "full duplex" lights came on
> immediately.
>
> Would this mean that the driver/card already were in full-duplex? That
> would explain me
James Sutherland wrote:
> > That would explain me seeing way too many collisions on that old hub
> > (which obviously doesn't support full-duplex).
>
> No, it would just prevent your card working. Large numbers of collisions
> are normal during fast transfers across a hub.
Why would it
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Rogier Wolff wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have a bunch of computers with 8139 cards. When I moved the cables
> over from my hub to my new switch all the "full duplex" lights came on
> immediately.
That's what you would expect: they will auto-negotiate full duplex, in the
same
Hi All,
I have a bunch of computers with 8139 cards. When I moved the cables
over from my hub to my new switch all the "full duplex" lights came on
immediately.
Would this mean that the driver/card already were in full-duplex? That
would explain me seeing way too many collisions on that old
Hi All,
I have a bunch of computers with 8139 cards. When I moved the cables
over from my hub to my new switch all the "full duplex" lights came on
immediately.
Would this mean that the driver/card already were in full-duplex? That
would explain me seeing way too many collisions on that old
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Rogier Wolff wrote:
Hi All,
I have a bunch of computers with 8139 cards. When I moved the cables
over from my hub to my new switch all the "full duplex" lights came on
immediately.
That's what you would expect: they will auto-negotiate full duplex, in the
same way
James Sutherland wrote:
That would explain me seeing way too many collisions on that old hub
(which obviously doesn't support full-duplex).
No, it would just prevent your card working. Large numbers of collisions
are normal during fast transfers across a hub.
Why would it completely "not
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Rogier Wolff wrote:
I have a bunch of computers with 8139 cards. When I moved the cables
over from my hub to my new switch all the "full duplex" lights came on
immediately.
Would this mean that the driver/card already were in full-duplex? That
would explain me seeing
Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Rogier Wolff wrote:
I have a bunch of computers with 8139 cards. When I moved the cables
over from my hub to my new switch all the "full duplex" lights came on
immediately.
Would this mean that the driver/card already were in full-duplex? That
Would this mean that the driver/card already were in full-duplex? That
would explain me seeing way too many collisions on that old hub (which
obviously doesn't support full-duplex).
Most likely it means they were set to autonegotiate
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 10:40:53AM +0100, Rogier Wolff wrote:
Why would it completely "not work"?
experience maybe. telnet works just fine. a copy would end in a _very_
slow transfer. and if I say slow, I mean a few kbytes/sec. depends on
the number of colls as well.
besides, what gains are
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Rogier Wolff wrote:
James Sutherland wrote:
That would explain me seeing way too many collisions on that old hub
(which obviously doesn't support full-duplex).
No, it would just prevent your card working. Large numbers of collisions
are normal during fast
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Rogier Wolff wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Rogier Wolff wrote:
I have a bunch of computers with 8139 cards. When I moved the cables
over from my hub to my new switch all the "full duplex" lights came on
immediately.
Would this mean that the
18 matches
Mail list logo
