On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 07:39:25PM +0100, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> On Mit, 2007-12-12 at 10:02 -0800, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 December 2007 09:46, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> [...]
> > > People have proposed writing a daemon that just reads
> > > /proc/net/rpc/nfsd periodically
On Mit, 2007-12-12 at 10:02 -0800, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 December 2007 09:46, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
[...]
> > People have proposed writing a daemon that just reads
> > /proc/net/rpc/nfsd periodically and uses that to adjust the number of
> > threads from userspace, probably
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 09:46, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:46:18AM -0800, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > Incidentally, we ran our tests with 128 knfsd threads. The default
> > of 8 threads produces miserable performance on the SSD, which gave
> > us a good scare on our
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:46:18AM -0800, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Incidentally, we ran our tests with 128 knfsd threads. The default of 8
> threads produces miserable performance on the SSD, which gave us a good
> scare on our initial test run. It would be very nice to implement an
>
The imminent demise of rotating media storage has been predicted for
many years now, and here is a device that aims to help turn that
fantasy into fact:
http://www.violin-memory.com/products/violin1010.html
Well. At least if you have the money, and are not bothered by the fact
that that
The imminent demise of rotating media storage has been predicted for
many years now, and here is a device that aims to help turn that
fantasy into fact:
http://www.violin-memory.com/products/violin1010.html
Well. At least if you have the money, and are not bothered by the fact
that that
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:46:18AM -0800, Daniel Phillips wrote:
Incidentally, we ran our tests with 128 knfsd threads. The default of 8
threads produces miserable performance on the SSD, which gave us a good
scare on our initial test run. It would be very nice to implement an
algorithm
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 09:46, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:46:18AM -0800, Daniel Phillips wrote:
Incidentally, we ran our tests with 128 knfsd threads. The default
of 8 threads produces miserable performance on the SSD, which gave
us a good scare on our initial
On Mit, 2007-12-12 at 10:02 -0800, Daniel Phillips wrote:
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 09:46, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
[...]
People have proposed writing a daemon that just reads
/proc/net/rpc/nfsd periodically and uses that to adjust the number of
threads from userspace, probably subject to
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 07:39:25PM +0100, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Mit, 2007-12-12 at 10:02 -0800, Daniel Phillips wrote:
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 09:46, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
[...]
People have proposed writing a daemon that just reads
/proc/net/rpc/nfsd periodically and uses
10 matches
Mail list logo
