On Thursday, 11 October 2007 20:42, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Kevin wrote:
> >> The last kernel I used was 6.2.22 the "dmesg" the file is attached:
> >>
> >> dmesg 2.6.22 line 158 > apm: overridden by ACPI.
> >>
> >> dmesg, APM on, has no line > apm:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 02:42:01PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > And I think I see the problem: it's a config change. You don't have
> > PM_LEGACY enabled. Your config file diff shows:
> >
> >-CONFIG_PM_LEGACY=y
> >+# CONFIG_PM_LEGACY is not set
> >
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Kevin wrote:
The last kernel I used was 6.2.22 the "dmesg" the file is attached:
dmesg 2.6.22 line 158 > apm: overridden by ACPI.
dmesg, APM on, has no line > apm: overridden by ACPI.
Ok, this is the real reason.
The APM code does:
if
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Kevin wrote:
>
> The last kernel I used was 6.2.22 the "dmesg" the file is attached:
>
> dmesg 2.6.22 line 158 > apm: overridden by ACPI.
>
> dmesg, APM on, has no line > apm: overridden by ACPI.
Ok, this is the real reason.
The APM code does:
if
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Kevin wrote:
The last kernel I used was 6.2.22 the dmesg the file is attached:
dmesg 2.6.22 line 158 apm: overridden by ACPI.
dmesg, APM on, has no line apm: overridden by ACPI.
Ok, this is the real reason.
The APM code does:
if (PM_IS_ACTIVE()) {
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Kevin wrote:
The last kernel I used was 6.2.22 the dmesg the file is attached:
dmesg 2.6.22 line 158 apm: overridden by ACPI.
dmesg, APM on, has no line apm: overridden by ACPI.
Ok, this is the real reason.
The APM code does:
if
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 02:42:01PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
And I think I see the problem: it's a config change. You don't have
PM_LEGACY enabled. Your config file diff shows:
-CONFIG_PM_LEGACY=y
+# CONFIG_PM_LEGACY is not set
I suspect we
On Thursday, 11 October 2007 20:42, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Kevin wrote:
The last kernel I used was 6.2.22 the dmesg the file is attached:
dmesg 2.6.22 line 158 apm: overridden by ACPI.
dmesg, APM on, has no line apm: overridden by ACPI.
Linus Torvalds wrote:
We did have some APM *detection* changes, and maybe APM wasn't even
detected for you before, or it was detected differently. That would be due
to the bootup changes, I'm Cc'ing Peter Anvin (and the kernel mailing
list, in case somebody else see a pattern to this).
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Kevin wrote:
>
> I don't own a digital camera but I did jot the info down by hand.
Heh, yeah, that's what I used to do too (and still do if a camera isn't
handy).
> Call Trace:
> [] apm_bios_call_simple+0x92/0x110
> [] acpi_hw_clear_gpe_block+00/0x32
> []
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Kevin wrote:
I don't own a digital camera but I did jot the info down by hand.
Heh, yeah, that's what I used to do too (and still do if a camera isn't
handy).
Call Trace:
[c010e852] apm_bios_call_simple+0x92/0x110
[c0285a0] acpi_hw_clear_gpe_block+00/0x32
[c010e8ec]
Linus Torvalds wrote:
We did have some APM *detection* changes, and maybe APM wasn't even
detected for you before, or it was detected differently. That would be due
to the bootup changes, I'm Cc'ing Peter Anvin (and the kernel mailing
list, in case somebody else see a pattern to this).
12 matches
Mail list logo
