On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 08:28:57AM -0800, Reto Baettig wrote:
> Is there any chance that we will see this patch as well as your other
> Alpha patches included in future 2.2.X and 2.4.X releases?
Yes, for 2.2.x I'm waiting 2.2.19pre, for 2.4.x as DaveM suggested we first
need to cleanup the
Hi!
It's great that you could fix that!
Is there any chance that we will see this patch as well as your other
Alpha patches included in future 2.2.X and 2.4.X releases?
Thanks,
Reto
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> There were a few SMP races that could trigger only using threads:
>
> 1)
Hi!
It's great that you could fix that!
Is there any chance that we will see this patch as well as your other
Alpha patches included in future 2.2.X and 2.4.X releases?
Thanks,
Reto
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
There were a few SMP races that could trigger only using threads:
1)
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 08:28:57AM -0800, Reto Baettig wrote:
Is there any chance that we will see this patch as well as your other
Alpha patches included in future 2.2.X and 2.4.X releases?
Yes, for 2.2.x I'm waiting 2.2.19pre, for 2.4.x as DaveM suggested we first
need to cleanup the
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 10:57:49PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 10:09:34AM -0800, Reto Baettig wrote:
> > I have a problem whith Alpha SMP's which seems to be kernel-related. I
> > discussed this on the bug-glibc list but everybody seems to agree that
> > it cannot be
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 10:57:49PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 10:09:34AM -0800, Reto Baettig wrote:
I have a problem whith Alpha SMP's which seems to be kernel-related. I
discussed this on the bug-glibc list but everybody seems to agree that
it cannot be a libc
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 10:09:34AM -0800, Reto Baettig wrote:
> I have a problem whith Alpha SMP's which seems to be kernel-related. I
> discussed this on the bug-glibc list but everybody seems to agree that
> it cannot be a libc problem.
Indeed it does seem to be some sort of tlb flushing
Update: I just tested it on Alpha UP and everything's fine. It really
seems to be a SMP problem...
Reto Baettig wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have a problem whith Alpha SMP's which seems to be kernel-related. I
> discussed this on the bug-glibc list but everybody seems to agree that
> it cannot be a
Hi
I have a problem whith Alpha SMP's which seems to be kernel-related. I
discussed this on the bug-glibc list but everybody seems to agree that
it cannot be a libc problem.
I attached a little testprogram which reproduces the bug in < 1Minute.
BUT: IT MUST BE STARTED AT LEAST TWICE!
The
Hi
I have a problem whith Alpha SMP's which seems to be kernel-related. I
discussed this on the bug-glibc list but everybody seems to agree that
it cannot be a libc problem.
I attached a little testprogram which reproduces the bug in 1Minute.
BUT: IT MUST BE STARTED AT LEAST TWICE!
The
Update: I just tested it on Alpha UP and everything's fine. It really
seems to be a SMP problem...
Reto Baettig wrote:
Hi
I have a problem whith Alpha SMP's which seems to be kernel-related. I
discussed this on the bug-glibc list but everybody seems to agree that
it cannot be a libc
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 10:09:34AM -0800, Reto Baettig wrote:
I have a problem whith Alpha SMP's which seems to be kernel-related. I
discussed this on the bug-glibc list but everybody seems to agree that
it cannot be a libc problem.
Indeed it does seem to be some sort of tlb flushing problem,
12 matches
Mail list logo
