On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:39:41AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Harald Geyer
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown
> What
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:39:41AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Harald Geyer
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown
> What about using the DT node name instead, as is done for single-output
> clocks?
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> The patch
>
>regulator: dt: regulator-name is required property
>
> has been applied to the regulator tree at
>
>https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git
>
> All being well this means
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> The patch
>
>regulator: dt: regulator-name is required property
>
> has been applied to the regulator tree at
>
>https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git
>
> All being well this means that it will be
The patch
regulator: dt: regulator-name is required property
has been applied to the regulator tree at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24
The patch
regulator: dt: regulator-name is required property
has been applied to the regulator tree at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24
6 matches
Mail list logo