On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 16:55 +0100, Raphael Jacquot wrote:
[...]
> as your name appears european, there are no software patents (yet ?) so
Alas, this is wrong. The EPO is issuing masses of software patents since
years (though they are more or less explicitly[0] excluded from
patentability in the
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 16:55 +0100, Raphael Jacquot wrote:
[...]
as your name appears european, there are no software patents (yet ?) so
Alas, this is wrong. The EPO is issuing masses of software patents since
years (though they are more or less explicitly[0] excluded from
patentability in the
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 17:26 +, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2005-03-07 at 15:45, Mateusz Berezecki wrote:
> > I've been doing some reverse engineering of madwifi HAL (Hardware
> > Abstraction Layer) object file recently.
> > I ended up with an almost complete source code for one chipset so far
Hi,
Raphael Jacquot wrote:
as your name appears european, there are no software patents (yet ?) so
you should be able to release that code as required for interoperability
The release of that source does not depend on software patents (which
seem to be acked yesterday for europe ... ;-()
Hi,
Raphael Jacquot wrote:
as your name appears european, there are no software patents (yet ?) so
you should be able to release that code as required for interoperability
The release of that source does not depend on software patents (which
seem to be acked yesterday for europe ... ;-()
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 17:26 +, Alan Cox wrote:
On Llu, 2005-03-07 at 15:45, Mateusz Berezecki wrote:
I've been doing some reverse engineering of madwifi HAL (Hardware
Abstraction Layer) object file recently.
I ended up with an almost complete source code for one chipset so far
and I
> A different one than the one that's supported by OpenBSD's reverse-engineered
> HAL?
I guess so :-)
--
Mateusz Berezecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 04:45:38PM +0100, Mateusz Berezecki wrote:
> Hi list members,
>
> I've been doing some reverse engineering of madwifi HAL (Hardware
> Abstraction Layer) object file recently.
> I ended up with an almost complete source code for one chipset so far
A different one than
Not really an answer to your question but are you aware of the OpenBSD
free Atheros HAL work (as part of the OpenBSD ath driver)?
- R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Llu, 2005-03-07 at 15:45, Mateusz Berezecki wrote:
> I've been doing some reverse engineering of madwifi HAL (Hardware
> Abstraction Layer) object file recently.
> I ended up with an almost complete source code for one chipset so far
> and I was wondering if it is legal
> to publish such
Mateusz Berezecki wrote:
Hi list members,
I've been doing some reverse engineering of madwifi HAL (Hardware
Abstraction Layer) object file recently.
I ended up with an almost complete source code for one chipset so far
and I was wondering if it is legal
to publish such source code on the
Hi list members,
I've been doing some reverse engineering of madwifi HAL (Hardware
Abstraction Layer) object file recently.
I ended up with an almost complete source code for one chipset so far
and I was wondering if it is legal
to publish such source code on the internet? The note on a card
Hi list members,
I've been doing some reverse engineering of madwifi HAL (Hardware
Abstraction Layer) object file recently.
I ended up with an almost complete source code for one chipset so far
and I was wondering if it is legal
to publish such source code on the internet? The note on a card
Mateusz Berezecki wrote:
Hi list members,
I've been doing some reverse engineering of madwifi HAL (Hardware
Abstraction Layer) object file recently.
I ended up with an almost complete source code for one chipset so far
and I was wondering if it is legal
to publish such source code on the
On Llu, 2005-03-07 at 15:45, Mateusz Berezecki wrote:
I've been doing some reverse engineering of madwifi HAL (Hardware
Abstraction Layer) object file recently.
I ended up with an almost complete source code for one chipset so far
and I was wondering if it is legal
to publish such source
Not really an answer to your question but are you aware of the OpenBSD
free Atheros HAL work (as part of the OpenBSD ath driver)?
- R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 04:45:38PM +0100, Mateusz Berezecki wrote:
Hi list members,
I've been doing some reverse engineering of madwifi HAL (Hardware
Abstraction Layer) object file recently.
I ended up with an almost complete source code for one chipset so far
A different one than the one
A different one than the one that's supported by OpenBSD's reverse-engineered
HAL?
I guess so :-)
--
Mateusz Berezecki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
18 matches
Mail list logo
