On 27.05.2018 22:31, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Le 05/27/18 à 12:01, Gerhard Wiesinger a écrit :
On 24.05.2018 08:22, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the current
implementation is broken:
On 27.05.2018 22:31, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Le 05/27/18 à 12:01, Gerhard Wiesinger a écrit :
On 24.05.2018 08:22, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the current
implementation is broken:
On 27.05.2018 22:35, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Le 05/27/18 à 12:18, Gerhard Wiesinger a écrit :
On 27.05.2018 21:01, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 24.05.2018 08:22, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that
On 27.05.2018 22:35, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Le 05/27/18 à 12:18, Gerhard Wiesinger a écrit :
On 27.05.2018 21:01, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 24.05.2018 08:22, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that
Le 05/27/18 à 12:18, Gerhard Wiesinger a écrit :
> On 27.05.2018 21:01, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>> On 24.05.2018 08:22, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>>> On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the
current implementation is
Le 05/27/18 à 12:18, Gerhard Wiesinger a écrit :
> On 27.05.2018 21:01, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>> On 24.05.2018 08:22, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>>> On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the
current implementation is
Le 05/27/18 à 12:01, Gerhard Wiesinger a écrit :
> On 24.05.2018 08:22, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>> On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>>> After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the current
>>> implementation is broken:
>>>
>>>
Le 05/27/18 à 12:01, Gerhard Wiesinger a écrit :
> On 24.05.2018 08:22, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>> On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>>> After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the current
>>> implementation is broken:
>>>
>>>
On 27.05.2018 21:01, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 24.05.2018 08:22, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the
current implementation is broken:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/836538/
On 27.05.2018 21:01, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 24.05.2018 08:22, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the
current implementation is broken:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/836538/
On 24.05.2018 08:22, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the current
implementation is broken:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/836538/
On 24.05.2018 08:22, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the current
implementation is broken:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/836538/
On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the current
implementation is broken:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/836538/
On 24.05.2018 07:29, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the current
implementation is broken:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/836538/
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the current
implementation is broken:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/836538/
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/c499696e7901bda18385ac723b7bd27c3a4af624#diff-a2b6f8d89e18de600e873ac3ac43fa1d
Florians comment:
After some analysis with Florian (thnx) we found out that the current
implementation is broken:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/836538/
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/c499696e7901bda18385ac723b7bd27c3a4af624#diff-a2b6f8d89e18de600e873ac3ac43fa1d
Florians comment:
On 05/23/2018 11:27 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 23.05.2018 19:55, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 05/23/2018 10:35 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>>> On 23.05.2018 17:28, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> And in the future (time plan)?
If you don't care about multicast then you can use those
On 05/23/2018 11:27 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 23.05.2018 19:55, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 05/23/2018 10:35 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>>> On 23.05.2018 17:28, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> And in the future (time plan)?
If you don't care about multicast then you can use those
On 23.05.2018 19:55, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/23/2018 10:35 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 23.05.2018 17:28, Florian Fainelli wrote:
And in the future (time plan)?
If you don't care about multicast then you can use those patches:
On 23.05.2018 19:55, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/23/2018 10:35 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 23.05.2018 17:28, Florian Fainelli wrote:
And in the future (time plan)?
If you don't care about multicast then you can use those patches:
On 05/23/2018 11:11 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 23.05.2018 19:47, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 05/23/2018 10:29 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>>> On 23.05.2018 17:50, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/23/2018 08:28 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger
On 05/23/2018 11:11 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 23.05.2018 19:47, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 05/23/2018 10:29 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>>> On 23.05.2018 17:50, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/23/2018 08:28 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger
On 23.05.2018 19:47, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/23/2018 10:29 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 23.05.2018 17:50, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/23/2018 08:28 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On
On 23.05.2018 19:47, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/23/2018 10:29 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 23.05.2018 17:50, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/23/2018 08:28 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On
On 05/23/2018 10:35 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 23.05.2018 17:28, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>
>>> And in the future (time plan)?
>> If you don't care about multicast then you can use those patches:
>>
>> https://github.com/ffainelli/linux/commit/de055bf5f34e9806463ab2793e0852f5dfc380df
>>
>>
On 05/23/2018 10:35 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 23.05.2018 17:28, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>
>>> And in the future (time plan)?
>> If you don't care about multicast then you can use those patches:
>>
>> https://github.com/ffainelli/linux/commit/de055bf5f34e9806463ab2793e0852f5dfc380df
>>
>>
On 05/23/2018 10:29 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 23.05.2018 17:50, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>
>> On 05/23/2018 08:28 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn
On 05/23/2018 10:29 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 23.05.2018 17:50, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>
>> On 05/23/2018 08:28 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn
On 23.05.2018 17:28, Florian Fainelli wrote:
And in the future (time plan)?
If you don't care about multicast then you can use those patches:
https://github.com/ffainelli/linux/commit/de055bf5f34e9806463ab2793e0852f5dfc380df
and you have to change the part of
On 23.05.2018 17:28, Florian Fainelli wrote:
And in the future (time plan)?
If you don't care about multicast then you can use those patches:
https://github.com/ffainelli/linux/commit/de055bf5f34e9806463ab2793e0852f5dfc380df
and you have to change the part of
On 23.05.2018 17:50, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/23/2018 08:28 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
On 23.05.2018 17:50, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/23/2018 08:28 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
On 05/23/2018 08:28 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>> On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
>
> br0 <=> eth0.101 <=>
On 05/23/2018 08:28 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>> On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
>
> br0 <=> eth0.101 <=>
On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
br0 <=> eth0.101 <=> eth0 (vlan 101 tagged) <=> lan 1-lan4 (vlan 101
untagged
On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
br0 <=> eth0.101 <=> eth0 (vlan 101 tagged) <=> lan 1-lan4 (vlan 101
untagged
On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
br0 <=> eth0.101 <=> eth0 (vlan 101 tagged) <=> lan 1-lan4 (vlan 101
untagged pvid)
br1 <=> eth0.102 <=> eth0 (vlan 102 tagged) <=> wan (vlan 102
On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
br0 <=> eth0.101 <=> eth0 (vlan 101 tagged) <=> lan 1-lan4 (vlan 101
untagged pvid)
br1 <=> eth0.102 <=> eth0 (vlan 102 tagged) <=> wan (vlan 102
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:42:40PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >> Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
> >>
> >> br0 <=> eth0.101 <=> eth0 (vlan 101 tagged) <=> lan 1-lan4 (vlan 101
> >> untagged pvid)
> >>
> >> br1 <=> eth0.102
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:42:40PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >> Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
> >>
> >> br0 <=> eth0.101 <=> eth0 (vlan 101 tagged) <=> lan 1-lan4 (vlan 101
> >> untagged pvid)
> >>
> >> br1 <=> eth0.102
On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
>>
>> br0 <=> eth0.101 <=> eth0 (vlan 101 tagged) <=> lan 1-lan4 (vlan 101
>> untagged pvid)
>>
>> br1 <=> eth0.102 <=> eth0 (vlan 102 tagged) <=> wan (vlan 102 untagged pvid)
>
> Do you even
On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
>>
>> br0 <=> eth0.101 <=> eth0 (vlan 101 tagged) <=> lan 1-lan4 (vlan 101
>> untagged pvid)
>>
>> br1 <=> eth0.102 <=> eth0 (vlan 102 tagged) <=> wan (vlan 102 untagged pvid)
>
> Do you even
> Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
>
> br0 <=> eth0.101 <=> eth0 (vlan 101 tagged) <=> lan 1-lan4 (vlan 101
> untagged pvid)
>
> br1 <=> eth0.102 <=> eth0 (vlan 102 tagged) <=> wan (vlan 102 untagged pvid)
Do you even need these vlans?
Are you doing this for port
> Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
>
> br0 <=> eth0.101 <=> eth0 (vlan 101 tagged) <=> lan 1-lan4 (vlan 101
> untagged pvid)
>
> br1 <=> eth0.102 <=> eth0 (vlan 102 tagged) <=> wan (vlan 102 untagged pvid)
Do you even need these vlans?
Are you doing this for port
Hello,
I'm trying to get B53 DSA switch working on the Banana Pi-R1 on Fedora
26 to run (I will upgrade to Fedora 27 and Fedora 28 when networking
works again). Previously the switch was configured with swconfig without
any problems.
Kernel: 4.16.7-100.fc26.armv7hl
b53_common: found
Hello,
I'm trying to get B53 DSA switch working on the Banana Pi-R1 on Fedora
26 to run (I will upgrade to Fedora 27 and Fedora 28 when networking
works again). Previously the switch was configured with swconfig without
any problems.
Kernel: 4.16.7-100.fc26.armv7hl
b53_common: found
Hi,
On 05/22/2018 12:11 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to get B53 DSA switch working on the Banana Pi-R1 on Fedora
> 26 to run (I will upgrade to Fedora 27 and Fedora 28 when networking
> works again). Previously the switch was configured with swconfig without
> any
Hi,
On 05/22/2018 12:11 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to get B53 DSA switch working on the Banana Pi-R1 on Fedora
> 26 to run (I will upgrade to Fedora 27 and Fedora 28 when networking
> works again). Previously the switch was configured with swconfig without
> any
48 matches
Mail list logo
