Kimmo Sundqvist wrote:
Mar 12 10:39:45 shadowgate Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140
Mar 12 10:39:45 shadowgate [] local_bh_enable+0x64/0x70
Mar 12 10:39:45 shadowgate [] isdn_ppp_xmit+0xf7/0x7e0 [isdn]
Mar 12 10:39:45 shadowgate [] isdn_net_xmit+0x186/0x1d0 [isdn]
Mar 12 10:39:45
Gnt=10.Max Lat=10.
I/O at 0x6800 [0x687f].
Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe3001000 [0xe300107f].
Mar 12 10:39:45 shadowgate Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140
Mar 12 10:39:45 shadowgate [] local_bh_enable+0x64/0x70
Mar 12 10:39:45 shadowgate [] isdn_ppp_xmit+0xf7
Gnt=10.Max Lat=10.
I/O at 0x6800 [0x687f].
Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe3001000 [0xe300107f].
Mar 12 10:39:45 shadowgate Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140
Mar 12 10:39:45 shadowgate [c0114ca4] local_bh_enable+0x64/0x70
Mar 12 10:39:45 shadowgate [c486afd7
Kimmo Sundqvist wrote:
Mar 12 10:39:45 shadowgate Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140
Mar 12 10:39:45 shadowgate [c0114ca4] local_bh_enable+0x64/0x70
Mar 12 10:39:45 shadowgate [c486afd7] isdn_ppp_xmit+0xf7/0x7e0 [isdn]
Mar 12 10:39:45 shadowgate [c485d646] isdn_net_xmit+0x186/0x1d0
Bart De Schuymer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for posting this. I was just about to go on a wild goose chase.
> Any idea what patch fixed it?
It's this one:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/273477
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~}
Op di, 25-01-2005 te 03:36 +0100, schreef Ernst Herzberg:
> sorry for answering to myself, but someone (:-) send me a mail with the
> message
>
> > Fixed in -bk on Sunday.
>
> Thx :-)
Thanks for posting this. I was just about to go on a wild goose chase.
Any idea what patch fixed it?
cheers,
Op di, 25-01-2005 te 03:36 +0100, schreef Ernst Herzberg:
sorry for answering to myself, but someone (:-) send me a mail with the
message
Fixed in -bk on Sunday.
Thx :-)
Thanks for posting this. I was just about to go on a wild goose chase.
Any idea what patch fixed it?
cheers,
Bart
Bart De Schuymer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for posting this. I was just about to go on a wild goose chase.
Any idea what patch fixed it?
It's this one:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/273477
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmVHI~} [EMAIL
sorry for answering to myself, but someone (:-) send me a mail with the
message
> Fixed in -bk on Sunday.
Thx :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Fixed in -bk on Sunday.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
references but i cannot figure out what's wrong/how to fix.
Someone has an idea ?
thanks,
frank
Jan 24 22:50:32 atlas kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140
Jan 24 22:50:32 atlas kernel: [] local_bh_enable+0x74/0x80
Jan 24 22:50:32 atlas kernel: [] ppp_start_xmit+0xd8/0x250
:30 dev Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140
Jan 24 18:33:30 dev [] local_bh_enable+0x88/0x90
Jan 24 18:33:30 dev [] ebt_do_table+0x501/0x6f0 [ebtables]
Jan 24 18:33:30 dev [] br_dev_queue_push_xmit+0x0/0x140 [bridge]
Jan 24 18:33:30 dev [] nf_iterate+0x7a/0xb0
Jan 24 18:33:30 dev
:30 dev Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140
Jan 24 18:33:30 dev [c0121648] local_bh_enable+0x88/0x90
Jan 24 18:33:30 dev [f9324501] ebt_do_table+0x501/0x6f0 [ebtables]
Jan 24 18:33:30 dev [f91d2b60] br_dev_queue_push_xmit+0x0/0x140 [bridge]
Jan 24 18:33:30 dev [c02b4c3a] nf_iterate
references but i cannot figure out what's wrong/how to fix.
Someone has an idea ?
thanks,
frank
Jan 24 22:50:32 atlas kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140
Jan 24 22:50:32 atlas kernel: [c011df34] local_bh_enable+0x74/0x80
Jan 24 22:50:32 atlas kernel: [f8ca5d28] ppp_start_xmit
Fixed in -bk on Sunday.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
sorry for answering to myself, but someone (:-) send me a mail with the
message
Fixed in -bk on Sunday.
Thx :-)
Earny
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:39:26AM +0100, Ram?n Rey Vicente wrote:
> Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140
The cause of this was reverted earlier today.
--cw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
I get this with 2.6.11-rc2
Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140
~ [] local_bh_enable+0x60/0x80
~ [] destroy_conntrack+0xb7/0xe0 [ip_conntrack]
~ [] sock_wfree+0x0/0x40
~ [] __kfree_skb+0x6c/0xe0
~ [] rtl8139_start_xmit+0x75/0x120
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
I get this with 2.6.11-rc2
Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140
~ [c01162c0] local_bh_enable+0x60/0x80
~ [d0abee37] destroy_conntrack+0xb7/0xe0 [ip_conntrack]
~ [c0209580] sock_wfree+0x0/0x40
~ [c020a7ec] __kfree_skb+0x6c/0xe0
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:39:26AM +0100, Ram?n Rey Vicente wrote:
Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140
The cause of this was reverted earlier today.
--cw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
20 matches
Mail list logo
