On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 06:29:55PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 08:30:18PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:03:30PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > > > relevant. It seems to me that the hw_counters 'struct attribute_group'
> > > > should probably
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:03:30PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 12:52:41PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am testing the Clang Control Flow Integrity series that is being
> > worked on right now [1] and I encounter a violation in the Infiniband
> >
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 08:30:18PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:03:30PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> > > relevant. It seems to me that the hw_counters 'struct attribute_group'
> > > should probably be its own kobj within both of these structures so they
> > > can have
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:03:30PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > relevant. It seems to me that the hw_counters 'struct attribute_group'
> > should probably be its own kobj within both of these structures so they
> > can have their own sysfs ops (unless there is some other way to do this
> > that I
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 12:52:41PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am testing the Clang Control Flow Integrity series that is being
> worked on right now [1] and I encounter a violation in the Infiniband
> sysfs core (drivers/infiniband/core/sysfs.c) on an arm64 server with mlx5:
Hi all,
I am testing the Clang Control Flow Integrity series that is being
worked on right now [1] and I encounter a violation in the Infiniband
sysfs core (drivers/infiniband/core/sysfs.c) on an arm64 server with mlx5:
$ cat /sys/class/infiniband/mlx5_bond_0/ports/1/hw_counters/lifespan
12
$
6 matches
Mail list logo
