On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 14:02 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, August 12, 2013 07:02:44 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 02:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday, August 12, 2013 02:40:43 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2013-08-11 at 23:13 +0200, Rafael J.
On Monday, August 12, 2013 07:02:44 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 02:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, August 12, 2013 02:40:43 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2013-08-11 at 23:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, August 08, 2013 04:50:42 PM
On Monday, August 12, 2013 07:02:44 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 02:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, August 12, 2013 02:40:43 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Sun, 2013-08-11 at 23:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 04:50:42 PM Toshi Kani
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 14:02 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, August 12, 2013 07:02:44 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 02:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, August 12, 2013 02:40:43 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Sun, 2013-08-11 at 23:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 02:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, August 12, 2013 02:40:43 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-08-11 at 23:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Thursday, August 08, 2013 04:50:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 00:12 +0200, Rafael
On Monday, August 12, 2013 02:40:43 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-08-11 at 23:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 08, 2013 04:50:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 00:12 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, August 08, 2013 11:15:20 AM
On Sun, 2013-08-11 at 23:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, August 08, 2013 04:50:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 00:12 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Thursday, August 08, 2013 11:15:20 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 18:04 -0600, Toshi
On Sun, 2013-08-11 at 23:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 04:50:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 00:12 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 11:15:20 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 18:04 -0600, Toshi Kani
On Monday, August 12, 2013 02:40:43 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Sun, 2013-08-11 at 23:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 04:50:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 00:12 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 11:15:20 AM Toshi Kani
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 02:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, August 12, 2013 02:40:43 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Sun, 2013-08-11 at 23:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 04:50:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 00:12 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 04:50:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 00:12 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 08, 2013 11:15:20 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 18:04 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 01:43 +0200, Rafael J.
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 04:50:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 00:12 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 11:15:20 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 18:04 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 01:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 01:14 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, August 08, 2013 04:50:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 00:12 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Thursday, August 08, 2013 11:15:20 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 18:04 -0600, Toshi
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 04:50:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 00:12 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 08, 2013 11:15:20 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 18:04 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 01:43 +0200, Rafael J.
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 00:12 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, August 08, 2013 11:15:20 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 18:04 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 01:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Friday, August 02, 2013 03:46:15 PM Toshi
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 11:15:20 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 18:04 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 01:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, August 02, 2013 03:46:15 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 23:43 +0200, Rafael J.
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 18:04 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 01:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, August 02, 2013 03:46:15 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 23:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
:
> > > I think it fails with -EINVAL at the place with
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 18:04 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 01:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, August 02, 2013 03:46:15 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 23:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
:
I think it fails with -EINVAL at the place with
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 11:15:20 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 18:04 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 01:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, August 02, 2013 03:46:15 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 23:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 00:12 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 11:15:20 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 18:04 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 01:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, August 02, 2013 03:46:15 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 04:50:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 00:12 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 11:15:20 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 18:04 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 01:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 01:14 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 04:50:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 00:12 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 11:15:20 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 18:04 -0600, Toshi Kani
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 02:15 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, August 05, 2013 05:19:56 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 15:14 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > :
> > > Can you please test the appended patch? I tested it somewhat, but since
> > > the
> > > greatest
On Tuesday, August 06, 2013 11:12:51 AM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> (2013/08/06 9:15), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, August 05, 2013 05:19:56 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 15:14 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>:
> >>> Can you please test the appended patch? I
On Tuesday, August 06, 2013 11:12:51 AM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
(2013/08/06 9:15), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, August 05, 2013 05:19:56 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 15:14 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
:
Can you please test the appended patch? I tested it
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 02:15 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, August 05, 2013 05:19:56 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 15:14 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
:
Can you please test the appended patch? I tested it somewhat, but since
the
greatest number of
(2013/08/06 9:15), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, August 05, 2013 05:19:56 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 15:14 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
:
Can you please test the appended patch? I tested it somewhat, but since the
greatest number of physical nodes per ACPI device
On Monday, August 05, 2013 05:19:56 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 15:14 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> :
> > Can you please test the appended patch? I tested it somewhat, but since the
> > greatest number of physical nodes per ACPI device object I can get on my
> > test
> >
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 15:14 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
:
> Can you please test the appended patch? I tested it somewhat, but since the
> greatest number of physical nodes per ACPI device object I can get on my test
> machines is 2 (and even that after hacking the kernel somewhat), that was
t; Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks for your report.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thursday, August 01, 2013 05:37:21 PM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> >>>>>>>> By following commi
:15 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 23:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your report.
On Thursday, August 01, 2013 05:37:21 PM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
By following commit, I cannot hot remove a memory device.
ACPI / memhotplug: Bind removable memory blocks to ACPI
:15 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 23:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your report.
On Thursday, August 01, 2013 05:37:21 PM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
By following commit, I cannot hot remove a memory device.
ACPI / memhotplug: Bind removable memory blocks to ACPI
remove a memory device.
ACPI / memhotplug: Bind removable memory blocks to ACPI device nodes
commit e2ff39400d81233374e780b133496a2296643d7d
Details are follows:
When I add a memory device, acpi_memory_enable_device() always fails
as follows:
...
[ 1271.114116] [ea121c40
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 15:14 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
:
Can you please test the appended patch? I tested it somewhat, but since the
greatest number of physical nodes per ACPI device object I can get on my test
machines is 2 (and even that after hacking the kernel somewhat), that was
On Monday, August 05, 2013 05:19:56 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 15:14 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
:
Can you please test the appended patch? I tested it somewhat, but since the
greatest number of physical nodes per ACPI device object I can get on my
test
machines is
(2013/08/06 9:15), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, August 05, 2013 05:19:56 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 15:14 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
:
Can you please test the appended patch? I tested it somewhat, but since the
greatest number of physical nodes per ACPI device
at 23:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your report.
On Thursday, August 01, 2013 05:37:21 PM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
By following commit, I cannot hot remove a memory device.
ACPI / memhotplug: Bind removable memory blocks to ACPI device nodes
commit
y, August 02, 2013 03:46:15 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 23:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for your report.
> > > > > >
> > >
wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 23:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your report.
On Thursday, August 01, 2013 05:37:21 PM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
By following commit, I cannot hot remove a memory device.
ACPI / memhotplug: Bind
at 23:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your report.
On Thursday, August 01, 2013 05:37:21 PM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
By following commit, I cannot hot remove a memory device.
ACPI / memhotplug: Bind removable memory blocks to ACPI device nodes
commit
08-01 at 23:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your report.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thursday, August 01, 2013 05:37:21 PM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> > > > > >
wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your report.
On Thursday, August 01, 2013 05:37:21 PM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
By following commit, I cannot hot remove a memory device.
ACPI / memhotplug: Bind removable memory blocks to ACPI device nodes
commit
> >
> > > > Thanks for your report.
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, August 01, 2013 05:37:21 PM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> > > > > By following commit, I cannot hot remove a memory device.
> > > > >
> > > > > ACP
> On Thursday, August 01, 2013 05:37:21 PM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> > > > By following commit, I cannot hot remove a memory device.
> > > >
> > > > ACPI / memhotplug: Bind removable memory blocks to ACPI device nodes
> > > > commit e2ff39400d8
On Friday, August 02, 2013 03:46:15 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 23:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for your report.
> >
> > On Thursday, August 01, 2013 05:37:21 PM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> > > By following c
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 23:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your report.
>
> On Thursday, August 01, 2013 05:37:21 PM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> > By following commit, I cannot hot remove a memory device.
> >
> > ACPI / memhotplug: Bin
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 23:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your report.
On Thursday, August 01, 2013 05:37:21 PM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
By following commit, I cannot hot remove a memory device.
ACPI / memhotplug: Bind removable memory blocks to ACPI device nodes
On Friday, August 02, 2013 03:46:15 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 23:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your report.
On Thursday, August 01, 2013 05:37:21 PM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
By following commit, I cannot hot remove a memory device.
ACPI
:
By following commit, I cannot hot remove a memory device.
ACPI / memhotplug: Bind removable memory blocks to ACPI device nodes
commit e2ff39400d81233374e780b133496a2296643d7d
Details are follows:
When I add a memory device, acpi_memory_enable_device() always fails
.
On Thursday, August 01, 2013 05:37:21 PM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
By following commit, I cannot hot remove a memory device.
ACPI / memhotplug: Bind removable memory blocks to ACPI device nodes
commit e2ff39400d81233374e780b133496a2296643d7d
Details are follows:
When I
Hi,
Thanks for your report.
On Thursday, August 01, 2013 05:37:21 PM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> By following commit, I cannot hot remove a memory device.
>
> ACPI / memhotplug: Bind removable memory blocks to ACPI device nodes
> commit e2ff39400d81233374e780b133496a2296643d7d
By following commit, I cannot hot remove a memory device.
ACPI / memhotplug: Bind removable memory blocks to ACPI device nodes
commit e2ff39400d81233374e780b133496a2296643d7d
Details are follows:
When I add a memory device, acpi_memory_enable_device() always fails
as follows:
...
[ 1271.114116
By following commit, I cannot hot remove a memory device.
ACPI / memhotplug: Bind removable memory blocks to ACPI device nodes
commit e2ff39400d81233374e780b133496a2296643d7d
Details are follows:
When I add a memory device, acpi_memory_enable_device() always fails
as follows:
...
[ 1271.114116
Hi,
Thanks for your report.
On Thursday, August 01, 2013 05:37:21 PM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
By following commit, I cannot hot remove a memory device.
ACPI / memhotplug: Bind removable memory blocks to ACPI device nodes
commit e2ff39400d81233374e780b133496a2296643d7d
Details are follows
54 matches
Mail list logo