Re: Compat 32-bit syscall entry from 64-bit task!?

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 08:39:55PM -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: [...] > > Is there any progress with this (or any alternative) solution? > > > > I see the kernel side has changed a bit, and the strace part > > is in a better shape than 5

Re: Compat 32-bit syscall entry from 64-bit task!?

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 08:39:55PM -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: [...] > > Is there any progress with this (or any alternative) solution? > > > > I see the kernel side has changed a bit, and the strace part > > is in a better shape than 5

Re: Compat 32-bit syscall entry from 64-bit task!?

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 07:03:43PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote: >> Hi Linus, >> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Linus Torvalds >> wrote: >> >> Please look at strace source,

Re: Compat 32-bit syscall entry from 64-bit task!?

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 07:03:43PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote: >> Hi Linus, >> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Linus Torvalds >> wrote: >> >> Please look at strace source, get_scno() function, where >> >> it reads syscall no

Re: Compat 32-bit syscall entry from 64-bit task!?

Hi, On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 07:03:43PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > Hi Linus, > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: > >> Please look at strace source, get_scno() function, where > >> it reads syscall no and parameters. Let's see > >> -

Re: Compat 32-bit syscall entry from 64-bit task!?

Hi, On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 07:03:43PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > Hi Linus, > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: > >> Please look at strace source, get_scno() function, where > >> it reads syscall no and parameters. Let's see > >> - POWERPC: has 32-bit and 64-bit