Hi,
On Wed, Sep 13, David S. Miller wrote:
> It's an especially amusing situation especially since no vendor has
> shipped a distribution without the raid patches applied to their
> kernel for almost 2 years now.
You have a very interesting definition of "no vendor".
> Later,
> David S.
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 13, David S. Miller wrote:
It's an especially amusing situation especially since no vendor has
shipped a distribution without the raid patches applied to their
kernel for almost 2 years now.
You have a very interesting definition of "no vendor".
Later,
David S. Miller
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 05:31:17PM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On 13 Sep 2000, Ralf Gerbig wrote:
>
> > * Chip Salzenberg writes:
> >
> > Hi Chip,
> >
> > > According to Ralf Gerbig:
> > >> but SuSe and I believe RedHat etc. etc. _do_ ship patched kernels.
> >
> > > You've just made
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 05:31:17PM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
On 13 Sep 2000, Ralf Gerbig wrote:
* Chip Salzenberg writes:
Hi Chip,
According to Ralf Gerbig:
but SuSe and I believe RedHat etc. etc. _do_ ship patched kernels.
You've just made L-K's understatement of
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> According to Andre Hedrick:
> So I've noticed. Do you not believe in its technical future, or are
> you just conserving what's left of your free time?
I would be attending an ice skating party below before I would see this
included, and I am short
On 13 Sep 2000, Ralf Gerbig wrote:
> * Chip Salzenberg writes:
>
> Hi Chip,
>
> > According to Ralf Gerbig:
> >> but SuSe and I believe RedHat etc. etc. _do_ ship patched kernels.
>
> > You've just made L-K's understatement of the day.
>
> [...]
>
> so I rest my case vs shrink wrap.
>
* Chip Salzenberg writes:
Hi Chip,
> According to Ralf Gerbig:
>> but SuSe and I believe RedHat etc. etc. _do_ ship patched kernels.
> You've just made L-K's understatement of the day.
[...]
so I rest my case vs shrink wrap.
OTOH one of the first things I do after trying a new distribution
> > Solve that and the tool back compatibility problem for the cases in
> > question in a way Ingo is happy with and Raid 0.90 can go in. Simple
> > as that.
>
> Apply the RAID 0.90 patch and make Ingo (or someone else)
> maintain a patch which backs it out.
2.2 out of the box has to stay back
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > [1] I understand the RAID issue with disk format compatibility, which
> > makes the current RAID patch unacceptable for official 2.2 usage.
> > I just wish somebody would *solve* that issue.[2]
> Solve that and the tool back compatibility problem
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> that reducing it isn't worthwhile. The more de facto standard patches
> (*cough* NFS RAID[1] HedrickIDE *ahem*) can get into the 2.2 tree, the
> easier it will be for everyone to stay up to date, and the less effort
> will be wasted on basically
> [1] I understand the RAID issue with disk format compatibility, which
> makes the current RAID patch unacceptable for official 2.2 usage.
> I just wish somebody would *solve* that issue.[2]
> [2] Having complained about a problem, have I just volunteered myself
> to solve it?
Date:Wed, 13 Sep 2000 06:08:04 -0700
From: Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[1] I understand the RAID issue with disk format compatibility, which
makes the current RAID patch unacceptable for official 2.2 usage.
I just wish somebody would *solve* that issue.[2]
According to Ralf Gerbig:
> but SuSe and I believe RedHat etc. etc. _do_ ship patched kernels.
You've just made L-K's understatement of the day.
VA has always shipped a patched kernel. As of a few weeks ago, I'm
VA's new kernel coordinator. We're not quite done with the current
internal
[1] I understand the RAID issue with disk format compatibility, which
makes the current RAID patch unacceptable for official 2.2 usage.
I just wish somebody would *solve* that issue.[2]
[2] Having complained about a problem, have I just volunteered myself
to solve it? (HHOS)
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
[1] I understand the RAID issue with disk format compatibility, which
makes the current RAID patch unacceptable for official 2.2 usage.
I just wish somebody would *solve* that issue.[2]
Solve that and the tool back compatibility problem for
* Chip Salzenberg writes:
Hi Chip,
According to Ralf Gerbig:
but SuSe and I believe RedHat etc. etc. _do_ ship patched kernels.
You've just made L-K's understatement of the day.
[...]
so I rest my case vs shrink wrap.
OTOH one of the first things I do after trying a new distribution is
On 13 Sep 2000, Ralf Gerbig wrote:
* Chip Salzenberg writes:
Hi Chip,
According to Ralf Gerbig:
but SuSe and I believe RedHat etc. etc. _do_ ship patched kernels.
You've just made L-K's understatement of the day.
[...]
so I rest my case vs shrink wrap.
Yep. I installed
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
According to Andre Hedrick:
So I've noticed. Do you not believe in its technical future, or are
you just conserving what's left of your free time?
I would be attending an ice skating party below before I would see this
included, and I am short on
Date:Wed, 13 Sep 2000 06:08:04 -0700
From: Chip Salzenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[1] I understand the RAID issue with disk format compatibility, which
makes the current RAID patch unacceptable for official 2.2 usage.
I just wish somebody would *solve* that issue.[2]
19 matches
Mail list logo
