On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 03:01:46PM +0100, John M Collins wrote:
>...
> Could I possibly make a suggestion for "make xconfig" in the kernel tree
> (and make other-kinds-of-config I suppose)?
>
> I currently routinely copy the ".config" out of the previous kernel tree
> before I start to save
> I still don't think they would lose out by much.. I've just being
> trying to RE the ATI Mpeg2 IDCT/MC hardware, ATI know this, I know
> this, they are only wasting my time and my employers money (we still
> are going to buy their chips... no choice..) will they give out specs
> .. no .. why?
On 4/16/05, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mer, 2005-04-13 at 14:23, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 03:06:46PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> > Graphics card companies don't realize they are hardware companies not
> > software companies and that it is hardware
On Mer, 2005-04-13 at 14:23, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 03:06:46PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> Graphics card companies don't realize they are hardware companies not
> software companies and that it is hardware they make their money from?
> Oh and they have too many
On Mer, 2005-04-13 at 14:23, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 03:06:46PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
Graphics card companies don't realize they are hardware companies not
software companies and that it is hardware they make their money from?
Oh and they have too many
On 4/16/05, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mer, 2005-04-13 at 14:23, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 03:06:46PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
Graphics card companies don't realize they are hardware companies not
software companies and that it is hardware they make
I still don't think they would lose out by much.. I've just being
trying to RE the ATI Mpeg2 IDCT/MC hardware, ATI know this, I know
this, they are only wasting my time and my employers money (we still
are going to buy their chips... no choice..) will they give out specs
.. no .. why? cause
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 03:01:46PM +0100, John M Collins wrote:
...
Could I possibly make a suggestion for make xconfig in the kernel tree
(and make other-kinds-of-config I suppose)?
I currently routinely copy the .config out of the previous kernel tree
before I start to save working through
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 16:02 -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> A-Freakin'-MEN me droogy.
>
> Hehehe, either a slow system, or you know how to transfer a working
> setup to another machine.
>
> My current image I use(d) for all of my machines was Built a long time
> ago, I think slink was what I used
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:41 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:26:28AM -0500, Eric Rannaud wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 09:02 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > > modprobe nvidia || m-a -t prepare nvidia && m-a -t build nvidia && m-a -t
> > > install nvidia &&
Chris Friesen wrote:
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Graphics card companies don't realize they are hardware companies not
software companies and that it is hardware they make their money from?
Oh and they have too many lawyers?
This has been mentioned before, but I'll say it again.
Nvidia has
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:47:46AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
You're not. Complain to nvidia - using both email and snailmail.
If everybody with such problems did that, chances are they see
the light someday. Oh, and complain to the guy handing out
nvidia cards like
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:47:46AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
You're not. Complain to nvidia - using both email and snailmail.
If everybody with such problems did that, chances are they see
the light someday. Oh, and complain to the guy handing out
nvidia cards like
Chris Friesen wrote:
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Graphics card companies don't realize they are hardware companies not
software companies and that it is hardware they make their money from?
Oh and they have too many lawyers?
This has been mentioned before, but I'll say it again.
Nvidia has
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:41 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:26:28AM -0500, Eric Rannaud wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 09:02 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
modprobe nvidia || m-a -t prepare nvidia m-a -t build nvidia m-a -t
install nvidia modprobe nvidia
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 16:02 -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
A-Freakin'-MEN me droogy.
Hehehe, either a slow system, or you know how to transfer a working
setup to another machine.
My current image I use(d) for all of my machines was Built a long time
ago, I think slink was what I used to build
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Graphics card companies don't realize they are hardware companies not
software companies and that it is hardware they make their money from?
Oh and they have too many lawyers?
This has been mentioned before, but I'll say it again.
Nvidia has intellectual property from
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:26:28AM -0500, Eric Rannaud wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 09:02 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > modprobe nvidia || m-a -t prepare nvidia && m-a -t build nvidia && m-a -t
> > install nvidia && modprobe nvidia
>
> Something along the lines of:
> modprobe nvidia || sh
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 09:02 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> modprobe nvidia || m-a -t prepare nvidia && m-a -t build nvidia && m-a -t
> install nvidia && modprobe nvidia
Something along the lines of:
modprobe nvidia || sh NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1.run -s -f --no-network &&
modprobe nvidia
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 09:23 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Graphics card companies don't realize they are hardware companies not
> software companies and that it is hardware they make their money from?
> Oh and they have too many lawyers?
>
> It seems to me that 2D graphics are a done deal,
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 03:06:46PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2005-04-13T08:59:21, Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It is becoming harder and harder to find supported cards it seems.
> > Finding a card with decent 2D drivers for X can still be done, but 3D is
> > just
On 2005-04-13T08:59:21, Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is becoming harder and harder to find supported cards it seems.
> Finding a card with decent 2D drivers for X can still be done, but 3D is
> just not really an option it seems. Even 2D seems to be a problem on
> many cards
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:32:59PM +0100, John M Collins wrote:
> I'll do that - trouble is round where I am they dish out Nvidia cards
> like confetti, I've got them in the machine I use most and another 2 and
> you have to do all that gyrating with running the script to FTP down and
> build the
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:47:46AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> You're not. Complain to nvidia - using both email and snailmail.
> If everybody with such problems did that, chances are they see
> the light someday. Oh, and complain to the guy handing out
> nvidia cards like confetti, state your
John M Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 14:08 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
* John M Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Thanks to everyone for the pointers on this one I've rebuilt the kernels
and we'll see what happens.
BTW, I'd recommend updating to 2.6.11.7 so that you're
John M Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 14:08 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
* John M Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Thanks to everyone for the pointers on this one I've rebuilt the kernels
and we'll see what happens.
BTW, I'd recommend updating to 2.6.11.7 so that you're
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:47:46AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
You're not. Complain to nvidia - using both email and snailmail.
If everybody with such problems did that, chances are they see
the light someday. Oh, and complain to the guy handing out
nvidia cards like confetti, state your
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:32:59PM +0100, John M Collins wrote:
I'll do that - trouble is round where I am they dish out Nvidia cards
like confetti, I've got them in the machine I use most and another 2 and
you have to do all that gyrating with running the script to FTP down and
build the
On 2005-04-13T08:59:21, Lennart Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is becoming harder and harder to find supported cards it seems.
Finding a card with decent 2D drivers for X can still be done, but 3D is
just not really an option it seems. Even 2D seems to be a problem on
many cards if you
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 03:06:46PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2005-04-13T08:59:21, Lennart Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is becoming harder and harder to find supported cards it seems.
Finding a card with decent 2D drivers for X can still be done, but 3D is
just not really
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 09:23 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Graphics card companies don't realize they are hardware companies not
software companies and that it is hardware they make their money from?
Oh and they have too many lawyers?
It seems to me that 2D graphics are a done deal, with no
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 09:02 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
modprobe nvidia || m-a -t prepare nvidia m-a -t build nvidia m-a -t
install nvidia modprobe nvidia
Something along the lines of:
modprobe nvidia || sh NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1.run -s -f --no-network
modprobe nvidia
should
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:26:28AM -0500, Eric Rannaud wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 09:02 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
modprobe nvidia || m-a -t prepare nvidia m-a -t build nvidia m-a -t
install nvidia modprobe nvidia
Something along the lines of:
modprobe nvidia || sh
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Graphics card companies don't realize they are hardware companies not
software companies and that it is hardware they make their money from?
Oh and they have too many lawyers?
This has been mentioned before, but I'll say it again.
Nvidia has intellectual property from
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 22:32:59 BST, John M Collins said:
> I wish some kind soul would speak nicely to Nvidia and get them to see
> reason on the point but I suspect I'm not the first person to wish that.
NVidia is aware, and they're doing the best they can under the circumstances
(no, they can't
* John M Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Thanks to everyone for the pointers on this one I've rebuilt the kernels
> and we'll see what happens.
BTW, I'd recommend updating to 2.6.11.7 so that you're protected from
another local root exploit.
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 14:08 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * John M Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Thanks to everyone for the pointers on this one I've rebuilt the kernels
> > and we'll see what happens.
>
> BTW, I'd recommend updating to 2.6.11.7 so that you're protected from
> another
Thanks to everyone for the pointers on this one I've rebuilt the kernels
and we'll see what happens.
Seems like they got in because on most of the machines I had an ancient
sshd_config which allowed Protocol 1. When I installed newer sshds the
newer sshd_config got stuck in as a ".rpmnew" file.
You can find the source at
http://www.securiteam.com/exploits/5VP0N0UF5U.html
The fix:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CAN: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-0736
John M Collins wrote:
Please CC any reply to jmc AT xisl.com as
Please CC any reply to jmc AT xisl.com as I'm not subscribed - thanks
We had 5 machines broken into last night all but one with kernel 2.6.8
and found a binary "krad-no-longer-private.c" had been downloaded
It contains the string:
k-rad.c - linux 2.6.* CPL 0 kernel exploit
Discovered Jan
Please CC any reply to jmc AT xisl.com as I'm not subscribed - thanks
We had 5 machines broken into last night all but one with kernel 2.6.8
and found a binary krad-no-longer-private.c had been downloaded
It contains the string:
k-rad.c - linux 2.6.* CPL 0 kernel exploit
Discovered Jan 2005
You can find the source at
http://www.securiteam.com/exploits/5VP0N0UF5U.html
The fix:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CAN: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-0736
John M Collins wrote:
Please CC any reply to jmc AT xisl.com as
Thanks to everyone for the pointers on this one I've rebuilt the kernels
and we'll see what happens.
Seems like they got in because on most of the machines I had an ancient
sshd_config which allowed Protocol 1. When I installed newer sshds the
newer sshd_config got stuck in as a .rpmnew file.
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 14:08 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
* John M Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Thanks to everyone for the pointers on this one I've rebuilt the kernels
and we'll see what happens.
BTW, I'd recommend updating to 2.6.11.7 so that you're protected from
another local root
* John M Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Thanks to everyone for the pointers on this one I've rebuilt the kernels
and we'll see what happens.
BTW, I'd recommend updating to 2.6.11.7 so that you're protected from
another local root exploit.
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 22:32:59 BST, John M Collins said:
I wish some kind soul would speak nicely to Nvidia and get them to see
reason on the point but I suspect I'm not the first person to wish that.
NVidia is aware, and they're doing the best they can under the circumstances
(no, they can't
46 matches
Mail list logo
