Re: FS corruption on 2.4.0-ac8

2001-01-15 Thread Neil Brown
On Monday January 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Jure Pecar wrote: > > > > > There is something not that usual about my setup: i run raid1 /boot and > > raid5 root with one disk disconnected (its simply too loud...), so the > > array is in degraded mode all the time. O

Re: FS corruption on 2.4.0-ac8

2001-01-15 Thread Andreas Dilger
Jure, you write: > I was running 2.4.0test10pre5 happily for months and wanted to see how > things stand in the 'latest stuff'. Here's what i found: > > I compiled 2.4.0-ac8 with nearly the same .config as test10pre5 (with > latest gcc on rh7). Then i booted it and used X for some normal browsing

Re: FS corruption on 2.4.0-ac8

2001-01-15 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Jure Pecar wrote: > Hi all, > > I was running 2.4.0test10pre5 happily for months and wanted to see how > things stand in the 'latest stuff'. Here's what i found: > > I compiled 2.4.0-ac8 with nearly the same .config as test10pre5 (with > latest gcc on rh7). Then i booted

FS corruption on 2.4.0-ac8

2001-01-15 Thread Jure Pecar
Hi all, I was running 2.4.0test10pre5 happily for months and wanted to see how things stand in the 'latest stuff'. Here's what i found: I compiled 2.4.0-ac8 with nearly the same .config as test10pre5 (with latest gcc on rh7). Then i booted it and used X for some normal browsing and mp3s. Perform