On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:28:08PM -0500, Jérémie Galarneau wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:37:21PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >> * Alexandre Montplaisir | 2014-11-12 17:14:45 [-0500]:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> >>
> >> >This was
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:37:21PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> * Alexandre Montplaisir | 2014-11-12 17:14:45 [-0500]:
>
> SNIP
>
>>
>> >This was based on the most recent file format I was aware of, we will
>> >update it
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Jiri Olsa jo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:37:21PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Alexandre Montplaisir | 2014-11-12 17:14:45 [-0500]:
SNIP
This was based on the most recent file format I was aware of, we will
update it
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:28:08PM -0500, Jérémie Galarneau wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Jiri Olsa jo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:37:21PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Alexandre Montplaisir | 2014-11-12 17:14:45 [-0500]:
SNIP
This was based
...@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [tracecompass-dev] Support for Perf CTF traces now in master (was
Re: FW: [RFC 0/5] perf tools: Add perf data CTF conversion)
On 2014-11-26 12:37 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Alexandre Montplaisir | 2014-11-12 17:14:45 [-0500]:
>
>> Just
...@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [tracecompass-dev] Support for Perf CTF traces now in master (was
Re: FW: [RFC 0/5] perf tools: Add perf data CTF conversion)
On 2014-11-26 12:37 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Alexandre Montplaisir | 2014-11-12 17:14:45 [-0500]:
Just a quick note, this branch
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:37:21PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Alexandre Montplaisir | 2014-11-12 17:14:45 [-0500]:
SNIP
>
> >This was based on the most recent file format I was aware of, we will
> >update it accordingly if required.
> >
> >Testing welcome!
>
> I pushed the
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 01:31:38PM -0500, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
>
> On 11/27/2014 10:43 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 05:14:45PM -0500, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
> >>
> >>Testing welcome!
> >hi,
> >any other way besides compiling eclipse to test this? For pure mortals
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 01:31:38PM -0500, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
On 11/27/2014 10:43 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 05:14:45PM -0500, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
Testing welcome!
hi,
any other way besides compiling eclipse to test this? For pure mortals
with Fedora
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:37:21PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Alexandre Montplaisir | 2014-11-12 17:14:45 [-0500]:
SNIP
This was based on the most recent file format I was aware of, we will
update it accordingly if required.
Testing welcome!
I pushed the perf changes I
On 11/27/2014 10:43 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 05:14:45PM -0500, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
Testing welcome!
hi,
any other way besides compiling eclipse to test this? For pure mortals
with Fedora eclipse rpm.. ;-)
If you already have an Eclipse installation, you can use
On 11/27/2014 04:43 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> hi,
> any other way besides compiling eclipse to test this? For pure mortals
> with Fedora eclipse rpm.. ;-)
>
> or any instructions for the compilation.. I actually haven't checked yet
| mvn clean install -Pbuild-rcp -Dmaven.test.skip=true
does the
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 05:14:45PM -0500, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
>
> On 11/09/2014 08:31 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
> >On 2014-11-05 10:25 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> But if you could for example tell me the perf equivalents of all the
> strings in that file,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 05:14:45PM -0500, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
On 11/09/2014 08:31 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
On 2014-11-05 10:25 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
But if you could for example tell me the perf equivalents of all the
strings in that file, I could hack
On 11/27/2014 04:43 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
hi,
any other way besides compiling eclipse to test this? For pure mortals
with Fedora eclipse rpm.. ;-)
or any instructions for the compilation.. I actually haven't checked yet
| mvn clean install -Pbuild-rcp -Dmaven.test.skip=true
does the trick.
On 11/27/2014 10:43 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 05:14:45PM -0500, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
Testing welcome!
hi,
any other way besides compiling eclipse to test this? For pure mortals
with Fedora eclipse rpm.. ;-)
If you already have an Eclipse installation, you can use
On 2014-11-26 12:37 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Alexandre Montplaisir | 2014-11-12 17:14:45 [-0500]:
Just a quick note, this branch is now merged to master. So anyone who
pulls the code from the master branch at
git://git.eclipse.org/gitroot/tracecompass/org.eclipse.tracecompass.git
* Alexandre Montplaisir | 2014-11-12 17:14:45 [-0500]:
>Just a quick note, this branch is now merged to master. So anyone who
>pulls the code from the master branch at
>git://git.eclipse.org/gitroot/tracecompass/org.eclipse.tracecompass.git
>should be able to load perf-CTF traces in the viewer.
* Alexandre Montplaisir | 2014-11-12 17:14:45 [-0500]:
Just a quick note, this branch is now merged to master. So anyone who
pulls the code from the master branch at
git://git.eclipse.org/gitroot/tracecompass/org.eclipse.tracecompass.git
should be able to load perf-CTF traces in the viewer. The
On 2014-11-26 12:37 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Alexandre Montplaisir | 2014-11-12 17:14:45 [-0500]:
Just a quick note, this branch is now merged to master. So anyone who
pulls the code from the master branch at
git://git.eclipse.org/gitroot/tracecompass/org.eclipse.tracecompass.git
adding Matthew Khouzam to the loop
jirka
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 08:24:48PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> I try to get through my ctf mailbox and I hoped I can finish it today
> but I don't make it completely…
>
> On 11/06/2014 04:25 AM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
> > "mvn clean
adding Matthew Khouzam to the loop
jirka
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 08:24:48PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
I try to get through my ctf mailbox and I hoped I can finish it today
but I don't make it completely…
On 11/06/2014 04:25 AM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
mvn clean install.
I try to get through my ctf mailbox and I hoped I can finish it today
but I don't make it completely…
On 11/06/2014 04:25 AM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
> "mvn clean install". It is the Maven equivalent of "./configure && make" ;)
>
> Or if you want to build a standalone application (RCP):
>
I try to get through my ctf mailbox and I hoped I can finish it today
but I don't make it completely…
On 11/06/2014 04:25 AM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
mvn clean install. It is the Maven equivalent of ./configure make ;)
Or if you want to build a standalone application (RCP):
mvn clean
On 11/09/2014 08:31 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
On 2014-11-05 10:25 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
But if you could for example tell me the perf equivalents of all the
strings in that file, I could hack together such wrapper. With that,
in theory, perf traces should behave exactly
On 11/09/2014 08:31 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
On 2014-11-05 10:25 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
But if you could for example tell me the perf equivalents of all the
strings in that file, I could hack together such wrapper. With that,
in theory, perf traces should behave exactly
On 11/05/2014 01:50 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
[...]
If the trace events from both LTTng and perf represent the same thing
(and I assume they should, since they come from the same tracepoints,
right?), then we could just add a wrapper on the viewer side to
decide which event/field
* Alexandre Montplaisir | 2014-11-04 02:20:10 [+0100]:
>Hi Sebastian,
Hi Alexandre,
>On 11/03/2014 06:58 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>This is really great! Initially, I had believed that we would have
>needed to add a separate parser plugin, and to consider "perf traces"
>as a
* Alexandre Montplaisir | 2014-11-04 02:20:10 [+0100]:
Hi Sebastian,
Hi Alexandre,
On 11/03/2014 06:58 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
This is really great! Initially, I had believed that we would have
needed to add a separate parser plugin, and to consider perf traces
as a completely
On 11/05/2014 01:50 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
[...]
If the trace events from both LTTng and perf represent the same thing
(and I assume they should, since they come from the same tracepoints,
right?), then we could just add a wrapper on the viewer side to
decide which event/field
Hi Sebastian,
On 11/03/2014 06:58 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
[...]
I did on the linux side:
|perf record \
| -e sched:sched_switch \
| -a
This gave me perf.data trace. No with the new extension I converted it
into CTF data stream (perf data convert -i perf.data --to-ctf ctf) and
On 08/20/2014 09:14 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
> On 08/20/2014 05:28 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>
>> ok, easy enough ;-) so I'm guessing this governs the expected
>> CTF layout for event/stream headers/contexts, right?
>
> Correct, if the domain is "kernel" we then assume that the rest of the
>
On 08/20/2014 09:14 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
On 08/20/2014 05:28 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
ok, easy enough ;-) so I'm guessing this governs the expected
CTF layout for event/stream headers/contexts, right?
Correct, if the domain is kernel we then assume that the rest of the
trace
Hi Sebastian,
On 11/03/2014 06:58 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
[...]
I did on the linux side:
|perf record \
| -e sched:sched_switch \
| -a
This gave me perf.data trace. No with the new extension I converted it
into CTF data stream (perf data convert -i perf.data --to-ctf ctf) and
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 04:03:01PM -0400, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
>
> On 08/21/2014 12:58 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >hum, I've got nothing from babeltrace:
> >
> >[jolsa@krava ~]$ su
> >Password:
> >[root@krava jolsa]# lttng create perf
> >Spawning a session daemon
> >Session perf created.
>
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 04:03:01PM -0400, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
On 08/21/2014 12:58 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
hum, I've got nothing from babeltrace:
[jolsa@krava ~]$ su
Password:
[root@krava jolsa]# lttng create perf
Spawning a session daemon
Session perf created.
Traces will be
On 08/21/2014 12:58 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
hum, I've got nothing from babeltrace:
[jolsa@krava ~]$ su
Password:
[root@krava jolsa]# lttng create perf
Spawning a session daemon
Session perf created.
Traces will be written in /root/lttng-traces/perf-20140821-184956
[root@krava jolsa]# lttng
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 03:14:20PM -0400, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
> On 08/20/2014 05:28 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> >ok, easy enough ;-) so I'm guessing this governs the expected
> >CTF layout for event/stream headers/contexts, right?
>
> Correct, if the domain is "kernel" we then assume that
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 03:14:20PM -0400, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
On 08/20/2014 05:28 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
ok, easy enough ;-) so I'm guessing this governs the expected
CTF layout for event/stream headers/contexts, right?
Correct, if the domain is kernel we then assume that the rest
On 08/21/2014 12:58 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
hum, I've got nothing from babeltrace:
[jolsa@krava ~]$ su
Password:
[root@krava jolsa]# lttng create perf
Spawning a session daemon
Session perf created.
Traces will be written in /root/lttng-traces/perf-20140821-184956
[root@krava jolsa]# lttng
On 08/20/2014 05:28 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
ok, easy enough ;-) so I'm guessing this governs the expected
CTF layout for event/stream headers/contexts, right?
Correct, if the domain is "kernel" we then assume that the rest of the
trace contains the expected elements of a kernel trace.
Of
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 01:42:12PM -0400, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> (sorry for breaking the thread, I didn't have the original email, but was
> forwarded it)
np, some other folks to the CC
>
> I work on the Eclipse viewer (a.k.a. Trace Compass).
>
> > so I've put perf
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 01:42:12PM -0400, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
Hi Jiri,
(sorry for breaking the thread, I didn't have the original email, but was
forwarded it)
np, some other folks to the CC
I work on the Eclipse viewer (a.k.a. Trace Compass).
so I've put perf converted CTF
On 08/20/2014 05:28 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
ok, easy enough ;-) so I'm guessing this governs the expected
CTF layout for event/stream headers/contexts, right?
Correct, if the domain is kernel we then assume that the rest of the
trace contains the expected elements of a kernel trace.
Of
44 matches
Mail list logo
