On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Anton Vasilyev wrote:
> ish_dev_init() allocates 512*176 bytes memory for tx_buf and stores it at
> >wr_free_list_head.link list on ish_probe().
> But there is no deallocation of this memory in ish_remove() and in
> ish_probe() error path.
> So current intel-ish-ipc provides
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Anton Vasilyev wrote:
> ish_dev_init() allocates 512*176 bytes memory for tx_buf and stores it at
> >wr_free_list_head.link list on ish_probe().
> But there is no deallocation of this memory in ish_remove() and in
> ish_probe() error path.
> So current intel-ish-ipc provides
ish_dev_init() allocates 512*176 bytes memory for tx_buf and stores it at
>wr_free_list_head.link list on ish_probe().
But there is no deallocation of this memory in ish_remove() and in
ish_probe() error path.
So current intel-ish-ipc provides 88 KB memory leak for each
probe/release.
The patch
ish_dev_init() allocates 512*176 bytes memory for tx_buf and stores it at
>wr_free_list_head.link list on ish_probe().
But there is no deallocation of this memory in ish_remove() and in
ish_probe() error path.
So current intel-ish-ipc provides 88 KB memory leak for each
probe/release.
The patch
On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 17:34 +0300, Anton Vasilyev wrote:
> ish_dev_init() allocates 512*176 bytes memory for tx_buf and stores
> it at
> >wr_free_list_head.link list on ish_probe().
> But there is no deallocation of this memory in ish_remove() and in
> ish_probe() error path.
> So current
On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 17:34 +0300, Anton Vasilyev wrote:
> ish_dev_init() allocates 512*176 bytes memory for tx_buf and stores
> it at
> >wr_free_list_head.link list on ish_probe().
> But there is no deallocation of this memory in ish_remove() and in
> ish_probe() error path.
> So current
ish_dev_init() allocates 512*176 bytes memory for tx_buf and stores it at
>wr_free_list_head.link list on ish_probe().
But there is no deallocation of this memory in ish_remove() and in
ish_probe() error path.
So current intel-ish-ipc provides 88 KB memory leak for each
probe/release.
The patch
ish_dev_init() allocates 512*176 bytes memory for tx_buf and stores it at
>wr_free_list_head.link list on ish_probe().
But there is no deallocation of this memory in ish_remove() and in
ish_probe() error path.
So current intel-ish-ipc provides 88 KB memory leak for each
probe/release.
The patch
On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 20:56 +0300, Anton Vasilyev wrote:
> ish_dev_init() allocates 512*176 bytes memory for tx_buf and stores
> it at
> >wr_free_list_head.link list on ish_probe().
> But there is no deallocation of this memory in ish_remove() and in
> ish_probe()
> error path.
> So current
On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 20:56 +0300, Anton Vasilyev wrote:
> ish_dev_init() allocates 512*176 bytes memory for tx_buf and stores
> it at
> >wr_free_list_head.link list on ish_probe().
> But there is no deallocation of this memory in ish_remove() and in
> ish_probe()
> error path.
> So current
ish_dev_init() allocates 512*176 bytes memory for tx_buf and stores it at
>wr_free_list_head.link list on ish_probe().
But there is no deallocation of this memory in ish_remove() and in
ish_probe()
error path.
So current intel-ish-ipc provides 88 KB memory leak for each probe/release.
I have
ish_dev_init() allocates 512*176 bytes memory for tx_buf and stores it at
>wr_free_list_head.link list on ish_probe().
But there is no deallocation of this memory in ish_remove() and in
ish_probe()
error path.
So current intel-ish-ipc provides 88 KB memory leak for each probe/release.
I have
12 matches
Mail list logo