Andre Hedrick
ide.org> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mark
Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IDE disk slow? There's
help...
Andre Hedrick
andre@linux-To: Michael Kwasigroch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ide.org cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mark
Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IDE disk
2.4 is more up to date than 2.2+patch.
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Michael Kwasigroch wrote:
> Andre: What about 2.4.x? Will it contain your ide-patch or some subset? I
> hate to ask this but I don't have the time to play with 2.4-pre although
> I'd like to.
>
> If yes, forget about all this, since
Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
> Whatever card you are using, in you are getting that low I need to know
> more info. That drive should cook at 30MB/sec.
>
Hi
I've started to use the latest 2.4.0-test10pre3 kernel - my IBM disk
flyies at 33MB/s
on my BP6 - however the amount of
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
> Whatever card you are using, in you are getting that low I need to know
> more info. That drive should cook at 30MB/sec.
Andre, he wrote "old triton 2 board (Intel 430HX)". Do you really mean
you can do 30MB/sec on that board (no
ca>cc:
Subject: Re: IDE disk slow?
There's help...
Andre Hedrick wrote:
Michael,
Whatever card you are using, in you are getting that low I need to know
more info. That drive should cook at 30MB/sec.
Hi
I've started to use the latest 2.4.0-test10pre3 kernel - my IBM disk
flyies at 33MB/s
on my BP6 - however the amount of deadlocks is
2.4 is more up to date than 2.2+patch.
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Michael Kwasigroch wrote:
Andre: What about 2.4.x? Will it contain your ide-patch or some subset? I
hate to ask this but I don't have the time to play with 2.4-pre although
I'd like to.
If yes, forget about all this, since 2.4
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > No the are the pci device ide but different guts. This is the ugliness
> > that most never see.
>
> I think you left some words out. Are you saying that this is one of those
> chips which change PCI id in order to give the appearance of
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 01:22:59PM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote..
> >
> > > I reliably get 30MB/s with my IBM 30G 7200rpm ATA66 drive, using a
> > > Via VT82C586 controller. 2.4.0-test9. Modern drives are really fast.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 01:22:59PM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote:
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote..
I reliably get 30MB/s with my IBM 30G 7200rpm ATA66 drive, using a
Via VT82C586 controller. 2.4.0-test9. Modern drives are really fast.
Hmm,
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
No the are the pci device ide but different guts. This is the ugliness
that most never see.
I think you left some words out. Are you saying that this is one of those
chips which change PCI id in order to give the appearance of backwards
Here is what I can acheive using an IBM DeskStar 75 Gig 7200 RPM UDMA
100 (controller only does UDMA 66) using linux-2.4.0-test10-pre3 and 3.6
drivers for my VIA vt82c596b (I believe they are not official yet but
were released as a test package by email around October 6th on this
email list),
Here is what I can acheive using an IBM DeskStar 75 Gig 7200 RPM UDMA
100 (controller only does UDMA 66) using linux-2.4.0-test10-pre3 and 3.6
drivers for my VIA vt82c596b (I believe they are not official yet but
were released as a test package by email around October 6th on this
email list),
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote..
>
> > I reliably get 30MB/s with my IBM 30G 7200rpm ATA66 drive, using a
> > Via VT82C586 controller. 2.4.0-test9. Modern drives are really fast.
>
> Hmm, I'm confused here.
> VIA 586 can only do up to UDMA 2, which
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote..
> I reliably get 30MB/s with my IBM 30G 7200rpm ATA66 drive, using a
> Via VT82C586 controller. 2.4.0-test9. Modern drives are really fast.
Hmm, I'm confused here.
VIA 586 can only do up to UDMA 2, which should return speeds less than
that. My system has an identical
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, safemode wrote:
>
>
> That's what i was thinking, but 30MB/s seems to be quite an exaggeration.
> On my
> Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01), ide chipset my master (10.2GB
Yes because that chipset is limited to Ultra33 rates
> maxtor 7200rpm UDMA66) drive i get
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000 15:34:04 Dmitry Pogosyan wrote:
> safemode wrote:
>
> > That's what i was thinking, but 30MB/s seems to be quite an
> exaggeration.
> > On my
> > Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01), ide chipset my master
> (10.2GB
> > maxtor 7200rpm UDMA66) drive i get ~15-16MB/s
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 03:16:14PM -0400, safemode wrote:
> That's what i was thinking, but 30MB/s seems to be quite an exaggeration.
I reliably get 30MB/s with my IBM 30G 7200rpm ATA66 drive, using a
Via VT82C586 controller. 2.4.0-test9. Modern drives are really fast.
J
-
To
safemode wrote:
> That's what i was thinking, but 30MB/s seems to be quite an exaggeration.
> On my
> Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01), ide chipset my master (10.2GB
> maxtor 7200rpm UDMA66) drive i get ~15-16MB/s and on my slave (same
> interface, 20.1GB maxtor 7200rpm UDMA66), i
That's what i was thinking, but 30MB/s seems to be quite an exaggeration.
On my
Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01), ide chipset my master (10.2GB
maxtor 7200rpm UDMA66) drive i get ~15-16MB/s and on my slave (same
interface, 20.1GB maxtor 7200rpm UDMA66), i get ~13MB/s. This goes
Michael,
Whatever card you are using, in you are getting that low I need to know
more info. That drive should cook at 30MB/sec.
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Michael Kwasigroch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently bought a 40Gig IBM ATA100 disk as a replacement for a dying 4G
> SCSI disk. I knew I was
Hi,
I recently bought a 40Gig IBM ATA100 disk as a replacement for a dying 4G
SCSI disk. I knew I was risking some trouble because I have an about 4 year
old triton 2 board (Intel 430HX) and I didn't want to risk more trouble
(and spend more money) by using a proprietary PCI IDE controller
Hi,
I recently bought a 40Gig IBM ATA100 disk as a replacement for a dying 4G
SCSI disk. I knew I was risking some trouble because I have an about 4 year
old triton 2 board (Intel 430HX) and I didn't want to risk more trouble
(and spend more money) by using a proprietary PCI IDE controller
Michael,
Whatever card you are using, in you are getting that low I need to know
more info. That drive should cook at 30MB/sec.
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Michael Kwasigroch wrote:
Hi,
I recently bought a 40Gig IBM ATA100 disk as a replacement for a dying 4G
SCSI disk. I knew I was risking
That's what i was thinking, but 30MB/s seems to be quite an exaggeration.
On my
Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01), ide chipset my master (10.2GB
maxtor 7200rpm UDMA66) drive i get ~15-16MB/s and on my slave (same
interface, 20.1GB maxtor 7200rpm UDMA66), i get ~13MB/s. This goes
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000 15:34:04 Dmitry Pogosyan wrote:
safemode wrote:
That's what i was thinking, but 30MB/s seems to be quite an
exaggeration.
On my
Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01), ide chipset my master
(10.2GB
maxtor 7200rpm UDMA66) drive i get ~15-16MB/s and on my
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, safemode wrote:
That's what i was thinking, but 30MB/s seems to be quite an exaggeration.
On my
Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01), ide chipset my master (10.2GB
Yes because that chipset is limited to Ultra33 rates
maxtor 7200rpm UDMA66) drive i get
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote..
I reliably get 30MB/s with my IBM 30G 7200rpm ATA66 drive, using a
Via VT82C586 controller. 2.4.0-test9. Modern drives are really fast.
Hmm, I'm confused here.
VIA 586 can only do up to UDMA 2, which should return speeds less than
that. My system has an identical
29 matches
Mail list logo
