On Sat 01-09-12 09:41:37, Dan Merillat wrote:
> I have a known-broken WD15EADS, which has the hilariously terrible
> 1000ms IO response time. Yes, that's the right number of zeros. I'm
> using it as a convenient way to hunt down a general feeling of
> unresponsiveness under disk load
>
> In
On Sat 01-09-12 09:41:37, Dan Merillat wrote:
I have a known-broken WD15EADS, which has the hilariously terrible
1000ms IO response time. Yes, that's the right number of zeros. I'm
using it as a convenient way to hunt down a general feeling of
unresponsiveness under disk load
In this
I have a known-broken WD15EADS, which has the hilariously terrible
1000ms IO response time. Yes, that's the right number of zeros. I'm
using it as a convenient way to hunt down a general feeling of
unresponsiveness under disk load
In this case, the failing drive is mounted to /backup, and I'm
I have a known-broken WD15EADS, which has the hilariously terrible
1000ms IO response time. Yes, that's the right number of zeros. I'm
using it as a convenient way to hunt down a general feeling of
unresponsiveness under disk load
In this case, the failing drive is mounted to /backup, and I'm
4 matches
Mail list logo
