Re: Kbuild maintainership

[Michal Marek]

On 2017-03-11 06:45, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Michal,
> 
> 2017-03-10 19:15 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek :
>> On 2017-03-10 10:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> I assume that I will get a request to change the kbuild-current and
>>> kbuilt trees in linux-next soon.  In the meantime, should I remove the
>>> current ones?
>>
>> There is one genksyms fix in kbuild.git#kbuild which is not in mainline.
>> Masahiro, can you please pull it into your tree and give Stephen the url
>> and branches?
> 
> 
> Pulled into the (new)  linux-kbuild/kbuild

Thank you!

Michal

Re: Kbuild maintainership

[Michal Marek]

On 2017-03-11 06:45, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Michal,
> 
> 2017-03-10 19:15 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek :
>> On 2017-03-10 10:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> I assume that I will get a request to change the kbuild-current and
>>> kbuilt trees in linux-next soon.  In the meantime, should I remove the
>>> current ones?
>>
>> There is one genksyms fix in kbuild.git#kbuild which is not in mainline.
>> Masahiro, can you please pull it into your tree and give Stephen the url
>> and branches?
> 
> 
> Pulled into the (new)  linux-kbuild/kbuild

Thank you!

Michal

Re: Kbuild maintainership

[Masahiro Yamada]

Hi Michal,

2017-03-10 19:15 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek :
> On 2017-03-10 10:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> I assume that I will get a request to change the kbuild-current and
>> kbuilt trees in linux-next soon.  In the meantime, should I remove the
>> current ones?
>
> There is one genksyms fix in kbuild.git#kbuild which is not in mainline.
> Masahiro, can you please pull it into your tree and give Stephen the url
> and branches?


Pulled into the (new)  linux-kbuild/kbuild





-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Re: Kbuild maintainership

[Masahiro Yamada]

Hi Michal,

2017-03-10 19:15 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek :
> On 2017-03-10 10:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> I assume that I will get a request to change the kbuild-current and
>> kbuilt trees in linux-next soon.  In the meantime, should I remove the
>> current ones?
>
> There is one genksyms fix in kbuild.git#kbuild which is not in mainline.
> Masahiro, can you please pull it into your tree and give Stephen the url
> and branches?


Pulled into the (new)  linux-kbuild/kbuild





-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Re: Kbuild maintainership

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Michal,

On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:48:44 +0100 Michal Marek  wrote:
>
> Dne 10.3.2017 v 03:07 Masahiro Yamada napsal(a):
> > Hello Kbuild contributors,
> > 
> > 
> > As you may notice, Michal has been busy since the beginning
> > of this year, and it has been getting difficult for him to
> > work on Kbuild on his regular basis.  
> 
> Yes, that's unfortunately the case.
> 
> 
> > Michal sent me an email a few days ago, and we discussed this locally.
> > Then, I decided to be a new maintainer of Kbuild. [1]  
> 
> Thanks a lot for this and I wish you good luck with this new challenge.

I assume that I will get a request to change the kbuild-current and
kbuilt trees in linux-next soon.  In the meantime, should I remove the
current ones?

No rush though since I am on leave next week.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Re: Kbuild maintainership

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Michal,

On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:48:44 +0100 Michal Marek  wrote:
>
> Dne 10.3.2017 v 03:07 Masahiro Yamada napsal(a):
> > Hello Kbuild contributors,
> > 
> > 
> > As you may notice, Michal has been busy since the beginning
> > of this year, and it has been getting difficult for him to
> > work on Kbuild on his regular basis.  
> 
> Yes, that's unfortunately the case.
> 
> 
> > Michal sent me an email a few days ago, and we discussed this locally.
> > Then, I decided to be a new maintainer of Kbuild. [1]  
> 
> Thanks a lot for this and I wish you good luck with this new challenge.

I assume that I will get a request to change the kbuild-current and
kbuilt trees in linux-next soon.  In the meantime, should I remove the
current ones?

No rush though since I am on leave next week.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Re: Kbuild maintainership

[Masahiro Yamada]

Hi Michal,


2017-03-10 19:15 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek :
> On 2017-03-10 10:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> I assume that I will get a request to change the kbuild-current and
>> kbuilt trees in linux-next soon.  In the meantime, should I remove the
>> current ones?
>
> There is one genksyms fix in kbuild.git#kbuild which is not in mainline.
> Masahiro, can you please pull it into your tree and give Stephen the url
> and branches?

I have been wondering how itshould be handled.

(and I had already sent a question about this to your suse.com address.
I am guessing it has not reached to you, yet.)


I will pull the branch into the new repository.

Thanks!

-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Re: Kbuild maintainership

[Masahiro Yamada]

Hi Michal,


2017-03-10 19:15 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek :
> On 2017-03-10 10:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> I assume that I will get a request to change the kbuild-current and
>> kbuilt trees in linux-next soon.  In the meantime, should I remove the
>> current ones?
>
> There is one genksyms fix in kbuild.git#kbuild which is not in mainline.
> Masahiro, can you please pull it into your tree and give Stephen the url
> and branches?

I have been wondering how itshould be handled.

(and I had already sent a question about this to your suse.com address.
I am guessing it has not reached to you, yet.)


I will pull the branch into the new repository.

Thanks!

-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Re: Kbuild maintainership

[Masahiro Yamada]

Hi Stephen,


2017-03-10 18:17 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell :

> I assume that I will get a request to change the kbuild-current and
> kbuilt trees in linux-next soon.  In the meantime, should I remove the
> current ones?
>
> No rush though since I am on leave next week.


I had already dropped an email onto your address privately.
(Maybe, are you checking the ML, but not your mailbox yet?)

Anyway, no need to rush.
When you get back to work, please adjust linux-next.

Thanks!

-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Re: Kbuild maintainership

[Masahiro Yamada]

Hi Stephen,


2017-03-10 18:17 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell :

> I assume that I will get a request to change the kbuild-current and
> kbuilt trees in linux-next soon.  In the meantime, should I remove the
> current ones?
>
> No rush though since I am on leave next week.


I had already dropped an email onto your address privately.
(Maybe, are you checking the ML, but not your mailbox yet?)

Anyway, no need to rush.
When you get back to work, please adjust linux-next.

Thanks!

-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Re: Kbuild maintainership

[Michal Marek]

On 2017-03-10 10:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> I assume that I will get a request to change the kbuild-current and
> kbuilt trees in linux-next soon.  In the meantime, should I remove the
> current ones?

There is one genksyms fix in kbuild.git#kbuild which is not in mainline.
Masahiro, can you please pull it into your tree and give Stephen the url
and branches?

Thanks,
Michal

Re: Kbuild maintainership

[Michal Marek]

On 2017-03-10 10:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> I assume that I will get a request to change the kbuild-current and
> kbuilt trees in linux-next soon.  In the meantime, should I remove the
> current ones?

There is one genksyms fix in kbuild.git#kbuild which is not in mainline.
Masahiro, can you please pull it into your tree and give Stephen the url
and branches?

Thanks,
Michal

Re: Kbuild maintainership

[Michal Marek]

Dne 10.3.2017 v 03:07 Masahiro Yamada napsal(a):
> Hello Kbuild contributors,
> 
> 
> As you may notice, Michal has been busy since the beginning
> of this year, and it has been getting difficult for him to
> work on Kbuild on his regular basis.

Yes, that's unfortunately the case.


> Michal sent me an email a few days ago, and we discussed this locally.
> Then, I decided to be a new maintainer of Kbuild. [1]

Thanks a lot for this and I wish you good luck with this new challenge.

Michal

Re: Kbuild maintainership

[Michal Marek]

Dne 10.3.2017 v 03:07 Masahiro Yamada napsal(a):
> Hello Kbuild contributors,
> 
> 
> As you may notice, Michal has been busy since the beginning
> of this year, and it has been getting difficult for him to
> work on Kbuild on his regular basis.

Yes, that's unfortunately the case.


> Michal sent me an email a few days ago, and we discussed this locally.
> Then, I decided to be a new maintainer of Kbuild. [1]

Thanks a lot for this and I wish you good luck with this new challenge.

Michal

Kbuild maintainership

[Masahiro Yamada]

Hello Kbuild contributors,


As you may notice, Michal has been busy since the beginning
of this year, and it has been getting difficult for him to
work on Kbuild on his regular basis.

Michal sent me an email a few days ago, and we discussed this locally.
Then, I decided to be a new maintainer of Kbuild. [1]
Michal will stay as a maintainer too, but Kbuild patches will be
primarily collected by me from this development cycle.

I know many developers are looking forward to their patches picked up.
I will try my best to help the community, and I just started to take a look.
So, please wait a little more.

If you have urgent problems, please speak up!

Thanks!


[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9614477/

-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Kbuild maintainership

[Masahiro Yamada]

Hello Kbuild contributors,


As you may notice, Michal has been busy since the beginning
of this year, and it has been getting difficult for him to
work on Kbuild on his regular basis.

Michal sent me an email a few days ago, and we discussed this locally.
Then, I decided to be a new maintainer of Kbuild. [1]
Michal will stay as a maintainer too, but Kbuild patches will be
primarily collected by me from this development cycle.

I know many developers are looking forward to their patches picked up.
I will try my best to help the community, and I just started to take a look.
So, please wait a little more.

If you have urgent problems, please speak up!

Thanks!


[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9614477/

-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada