On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:50 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> Woody,
>
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2019, Woody Suwalski wrote:
>
> > I have tried to "bisect" the config changes, and builds working/not
> > working between
> > rc3-rc4-rc5, and come out with the same frustrating result, that
> > building a
Woody,
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019, Woody Suwalski wrote:
> I have tried to "bisect" the config changes, and builds working/not
> working between
> rc3-rc4-rc5, and come out with the same frustrating result, that
> building a "clean" kernel is not producing the same behavoir as
> incremental building
I have tried to "bisect" the config changes, and builds working/not
working between
rc3-rc4-rc5, and come out with the same frustrating result, that
building a "clean" kernel is not producing the same behavoir as
incremental building while bisecting. For some reason even after
getting to the same
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019, Woody Suwalski wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 2:37 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Woody Suwalski wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 1:24 PM Thomas Gleixner
> > > wrote:
> > > > The ACPI handler is not the culprit. This is either an emulation bug or
>
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 2:37 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> Woody,
>
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Woody Suwalski wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 1:24 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > The ACPI handler is not the culprit. This is either an emulation bug or
> > > something really strange. Can you please
Woody,
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Woody Suwalski wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 1:24 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > The ACPI handler is not the culprit. This is either an emulation bug or
> > something really strange. Can you please use a WARN_ON() if the loop is
> > exited via the timeout so we can
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 1:24 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Woody Suwalski wrote:
>
> > I have added a timeout counter in __synchronize_hardirq().
> > At the bottom I have converted while(inprogress); to while(inprogress
> > && timeout++ < 100);
> >
> > That is bypassing the
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
Woody,
On Mon, 12
Thomas, Rafael,
I have added a timeout counter in __synchronize_hardirq().
At the bottom I have converted while(inprogress); to while(inprogress
&& timeout++ < 100);
That is bypassing the suspend lockup problem. On both 32-bit and
64-bit VMs the countdown is triggered by sync of irq9.
Which
Moving the thread to LKML, as suggested by Thomas...
-- Forwarded message -
From: Woody Suwalski
Date: Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 3:45 PM
Subject: Intermittent suspend on 5.3 / 5.2
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi Rafał,
I know that you are investigating some issues between these 2
10 matches
Mail list logo
