I'm not seeing where there is a problem, unless you are trying to assume that
you have no right to distribute them at all.
there is no source for the .config file, it is the source. so when you
distribute it, you are complying with any distribution requirements.
it could be argued that
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 12:01:46AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > Naively, since the defconfigs are bundled with the kernel, that could
> > fall under GPLv2-only implicitly, but lacking any explicit copyright
> > headers makes this interesting (arch/*/configs/* contain lots of files,
> > no
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 01:43:01AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> (Please CC me on replies, not subscribed to LKML)
>
> Hi,
>
> Somewhat of an odd question, but none of the files in question seem to
> have a copyright header on them...
>
> For a kernel .config file, either from one of the
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 01:43:01AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
(Please CC me on replies, not subscribed to LKML)
Hi,
Somewhat of an odd question, but none of the files in question seem to
have a copyright header on them...
For a kernel .config file, either from one of the defconfig
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 12:01:46AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
Naively, since the defconfigs are bundled with the kernel, that could
fall under GPLv2-only implicitly, but lacking any explicit copyright
headers makes this interesting (arch/*/configs/* contain lots of files,
no copyright
I'm not seeing where there is a problem, unless you are trying to assume that
you have no right to distribute them at all.
there is no source for the .config file, it is the source. so when you
distribute it, you are complying with any distribution requirements.
it could be argued that
I am not a Lawyer
But I would start asking the same questions about these files that we ask about
header files.
Is there anything in the file that is not functionally required? (I believe the
answer is no, everything there is required to be what it is to make the kernel
work)
The only
(Please CC me on replies, not subscribed to LKML)
Hi,
Somewhat of an odd question, but none of the files in question seem to
have a copyright header on them...
For a kernel .config file, either from one of the defconfig or any other
*config option that automates the answer:
1. What license does
(Please CC me on replies, not subscribed to LKML)
Hi,
Somewhat of an odd question, but none of the files in question seem to
have a copyright header on them...
For a kernel .config file, either from one of the defconfig or any other
*config option that automates the answer:
1. What license does
I am not a Lawyer
But I would start asking the same questions about these files that we ask about
header files.
Is there anything in the file that is not functionally required? (I believe the
answer is no, everything there is required to be what it is to make the kernel
work)
The only
10 matches
Mail list logo
