Not /dev/hda42, thats odd. From 2.4.5 -> 2.4.6 ReiserFS would refuse to
mount the drive on startup.
I noticed in pre5 there was a reiserfs fix to something but im not sure if
its related or not.
My domain is also back so I'm going to resubscribe.
Shawn.
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Neil Brown wrote:
Not /dev/hda42, thats odd. From 2.4.5 - 2.4.6 ReiserFS would refuse to
mount the drive on startup.
I noticed in pre5 there was a reiserfs fix to something but im not sure if
its related or not.
My domain is also back so I'm going to resubscribe.
Shawn.
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Neil Brown wrote:
Some days ago my box locked up hard while running Mozilla, XMMS, X-Chat and
some xterm's. Attached is the stuff I discovered in /var/log/messages after
rebooting the system. If you need more information, just tell me. This is my
first error report and I hope I didn't do too much wrong ;)
Some days ago my box locked up hard while running Mozilla, XMMS, X-Chat and
some xterm's. Attached is the stuff I discovered in /var/log/messages after
rebooting the system. If you need more information, just tell me. This is my
first error report and I hope I didn't do too much wrong ;)
On Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:33:49 AM +0100 Alan Cox
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> This after only using ac15 for a few hours... I've never seen anything
>> like that with ac13, which I've used for days.
>
> Is ac14 stable for you ?
>
Hi Justin,
ac14 was the first with a big reiserfs
>
> This after only using ac15 for a few hours... I've never seen anything
> like that with ac13, which I've used for days.
Is ac14 stable for you ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Shawn Starr wrote:
> 1) It broke apparently with gcc 2.95.3 when patching from 2.4.6-pre2 ->
> 2.4.6pre3
>
> 2) I tried building it with gcc 3.00 and had same result.
hmm, how ironic, i just had 2.4.5ac15 lock up when untarring gcc 3.0 on a
reiserfs partition (/)
This
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Shawn Starr wrote:
1) It broke apparently with gcc 2.95.3 when patching from 2.4.6-pre2 -
2.4.6pre3
2) I tried building it with gcc 3.00 and had same result.
hmm, how ironic, i just had 2.4.5ac15 lock up when untarring gcc 3.0 on a
reiserfs partition (/)
This after
On Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:33:49 AM +0100 Alan Cox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This after only using ac15 for a few hours... I've never seen anything
like that with ac13, which I've used for days.
Is ac14 stable for you ?
Hi Justin,
ac14 was the first with a big reiserfs cleanup
This after only using ac15 for a few hours... I've never seen anything
like that with ac13, which I've used for days.
Is ac14 stable for you ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 03:31:06PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Tuesday June 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:57:16PM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote:
> > >
> > > read_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on dev 03:42
> > > read_old_super_block: try to find super
On Tuesday June 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:57:16PM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote:
> >
> > read_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on dev 03:42
> > read_old_super_block: try to find super block in old location
> > read_old_super_block: can't find a reiserfs
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:57:16PM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> read_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on dev 03:42
> read_old_super_block: try to find super block in old location
> read_old_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on dev 03:42
> Kernel Panic: VFS: Unable to
On Monday, June 18, 2001 11:57:16 PM -0400 Shawn Starr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> read_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on dev 03:42
> read_old_super_block: try to find super block in old location
> read_old_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on dev 03:42
> Kernel
read_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on dev 03:42
read_old_super_block: try to find super block in old location
read_old_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on dev 03:42
Kernel Panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03:42
my super block broke somewhere?
Shawn.
On Mon,
On Monday, June 18, 2001 10:58:57 PM -0400 Shawn Starr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When diffing 2.4.6-pre2 & pre3 I noticed some reiserfs code was
> changed. This seems to cause VFS to panic via reiserfs.
>
> Anyone else notice this?
What is the panic message?
-chris
-
To unsubscribe
Two things:
1) It broke apparently with gcc 2.95.3 when patching from 2.4.6-pre2 ->
2.4.6pre3
2) I tried building it with gcc 3.00 and had same result.
3) I now have gcc 3.00 and going to rebuild 2.4.6-pre2 and see if reiserfs
panics if it doesn't there's an issue with the new pre3
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:58:57PM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote:
> When diffing 2.4.6-pre2 & pre3 I noticed some reiserfs code was changed.
> This seems to cause VFS to panic via reiserfs.
>
> Anyone else notice this?
I don't, and I boot on reiserfs.
OG.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
When diffing 2.4.6-pre2 & pre3 I noticed some reiserfs code was changed.
This seems to cause VFS to panic via reiserfs.
Anyone else notice this?
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
When diffing 2.4.6-pre2 pre3 I noticed some reiserfs code was changed.
This seems to cause VFS to panic via reiserfs.
Anyone else notice this?
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:58:57PM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote:
When diffing 2.4.6-pre2 pre3 I noticed some reiserfs code was changed.
This seems to cause VFS to panic via reiserfs.
Anyone else notice this?
I don't, and I boot on reiserfs.
OG.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Two things:
1) It broke apparently with gcc 2.95.3 when patching from 2.4.6-pre2 -
2.4.6pre3
2) I tried building it with gcc 3.00 and had same result.
3) I now have gcc 3.00 and going to rebuild 2.4.6-pre2 and see if reiserfs
panics if it doesn't there's an issue with the new pre3
On Monday, June 18, 2001 10:58:57 PM -0400 Shawn Starr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When diffing 2.4.6-pre2 pre3 I noticed some reiserfs code was
changed. This seems to cause VFS to panic via reiserfs.
Anyone else notice this?
What is the panic message?
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from
read_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on dev 03:42
read_old_super_block: try to find super block in old location
read_old_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on dev 03:42
Kernel Panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03:42
my super block broke somewhere?
Shawn.
On Mon,
On Monday, June 18, 2001 11:57:16 PM -0400 Shawn Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
read_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on dev 03:42
read_old_super_block: try to find super block in old location
read_old_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on dev 03:42
Kernel Panic:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:57:16PM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote:
read_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on dev 03:42
read_old_super_block: try to find super block in old location
read_old_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on dev 03:42
Kernel Panic: VFS: Unable to mount
On Tuesday June 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:57:16PM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote:
read_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on dev 03:42
read_old_super_block: try to find super block in old location
read_old_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 03:31:06PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
On Tuesday June 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:57:16PM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote:
read_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on dev 03:42
read_old_super_block: try to find super block in old
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Use pre2. Linus applied a patch that changed the PCI power management stuff
>and broke all the drivers.
It shouldn't have broken anything. The warning happens, but the
function call ends up doing the same thing as it used
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:39:49PM -0700, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> First off, the patch went into a pre-release of the kernel. Never would I
> trust a pre-release to be stable.
The issue is that of interface stability, as I'm sure you know.
> Second of all, if you look at the big picture, you
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use pre2. Linus applied a patch that changed the PCI power management stuff
and broke all the drivers.
It shouldn't have broken anything. The warning happens, but the
function call ends up doing the same thing as it used to - old
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:39:49PM -0700, Patrick Mochel wrote:
First off, the patch went into a pre-release of the kernel. Never would I
trust a pre-release to be stable.
The issue is that of interface stability, as I'm sure you know.
Second of all, if you look at the big picture, you may
On Tuesday, 12 June 2001, at 18:42:45 -0700,
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> User-noticeable things: if you are tired of not being able to NFS-export
> your reiserfs tree, this should make you happy.
>
> VM tuning has also happened, with Rik van Riel, Mike Galbraith, Marcelo
> Tosatti and Andrew
On Tuesday, 12 June 2001, at 18:42:45 -0700,
Linus Torvalds wrote:
User-noticeable things: if you are tired of not being able to NFS-export
your reiserfs tree, this should make you happy.
VM tuning has also happened, with Rik van Riel, Mike Galbraith, Marcelo
Tosatti and Andrew Morton
User-noticeable things: if you are tired of not being able to NFS-export
your reiserfs tree, this should make you happy.
VM tuning has also happened, with Rik van Riel, Mike Galbraith, Marcelo
Tosatti and Andrew Morton all doing various tweaks. Give it a whirl.
Linus
-
User-noticeable things: if you are tired of not being able to NFS-export
your reiserfs tree, this should make you happy.
VM tuning has also happened, with Rik van Riel, Mike Galbraith, Marcelo
Tosatti and Andrew Morton all doing various tweaks. Give it a whirl.
Linus
-
36 matches
Mail list logo
