Re: 2.2.18 megaraid driver broken [was: Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11]

2000-09-29 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
> > while (mbox->numstatus == 0xFF); > > > > is mbox volatile ? gcc 2.95 will certainly turn the above into an > > if() while(1); Is assume something else is changung mbox->numstatus ?? Else it doesn't make sense to me and someone might enlighten me on this one :) Igmar

Re: 2.2.18 megaraid driver broken [was: Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11]

2000-09-29 Thread Alan Cox
> while (mbox->numstatus == 0xFF); > is mbox volatile ? gcc 2.95 will certainly turn the above into an if() while(1); otherwise > Alan, can you forward this to the maintainer, or tell me from whom > you got the 2.2.18 patch so I can forward this to them ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] - T

Re: 2.2.18 megaraid driver broken [was: Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11]

2000-09-29 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
According to Miquel van Smoorenburg: > The megaraid driver in 2.2.18 doesn't work with MegaRaid 434 cards. > I've tried it on 2 different systems. Using 2.2.18pre11 with the > megaraid.[ch] from 2.2.17 works just fine. > > I've only been able to test with SMP systems though - perhaps this is > a

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11

2000-09-29 Thread Jun Hamano
> "Harold" == Harold Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: HvB>As far as I know, and Alan can correct me if I'm wrong, 2.2.x doesn't HvB> support e820h bios call, only the e801h call. The problem is that a lot of HvB> these newer bioses dropped the e801h from the bios, and only have 88h and Hv

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11

2000-09-28 Thread Harold Oga
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 09:23:42PM -0400, Horst von Brand wrote: >Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> > - Only 64 of 96 mbytes ram was found > >> BIOS issue > >Yes, but here 2.4.0test do find all 128Mb. Really dunno if latest 2.2.18pre >get it right, should check some day... Hi, As far as I k

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11

2000-09-28 Thread Horst von Brand
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > - Only 64 of 96 mbytes ram was found > BIOS issue Yes, but here 2.4.0test do find all 128Mb. Really dunno if latest 2.2.18pre get it right, should check some day... -- Horst von Brand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Casilla 9G, Vin~a del Mar,

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11

2000-09-28 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > > > 2.2.18pre11 > > I should mention that using an almost-all-modularised config I get this > for the last few pachlevels: > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.18pre11/misc/rio.o This patch fixes this: ---

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11

2000-09-28 Thread Eyal Lebedinsky
Alan Cox wrote: > > 2.2.18pre11 I should mention that using an almost-all-modularised config I get this for the last few pachlevels: depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.18pre11/misc/rio.o depmod: gs_set_termios depmod: gs_chars_in_buffer depmod: gs_write d

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11

2000-09-28 Thread Alan Cox
> - Only 64 of 96 mbytes ram was found BIOS issue > - Trident 4DWave DX show those messages: trident: drain_dac, dma timeout? I've sene these a few times, they are harmless but I need to figure out why the tail clear code causes them > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11

2000-09-28 Thread Luca Montecchiani
Some problems here.. - Only 64 of 96 mbytes ram was found - Trident 4DWave DX show those messages: trident: drain_dac, dma timeout? I'll provide more info/testing on request, luca ver_linux: -- Linux luca.home.net 2.2.18pre11 #8 Wed Sep 27 22:27:35 CEST 2000 i586 unknown Kernel module

Re: 2.2.18 megaraid driver broken [was: Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11]

2000-09-28 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <8qvfae$j52$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>2.2.18pre11 >[..] >>o Fix inia100/megaraid define clash (Arjan van de Ven) >[..] > >The megaraid driver in 2.2.18

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11

2000-09-28 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 10:14:14AM -0700, Dunlap, Randy wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 09:39:22AM -0700, Dunlap, Randy wrote: > > > > > > Yes, that looks like 2.4.0-test9 now, except that it should > > > be done for ohci also, although you don't need it for your > > > config. > > > > Right,

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11

2000-09-28 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 09:07:46AM -0700, David Rees wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 04:13:24AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > I'm getting this compile time error on 2.2.18pre11: > > > >

RE: Linux 2.2.18pre11

2000-09-28 Thread Dunlap, Randy
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 09:39:22AM -0700, Dunlap, Randy wrote: > > > > Yes, that looks like 2.4.0-test9 now, except that it should > > be done for ohci also, although you don't need it for your > > config. > > Right, but it doesn't look like the usb-ohci driver uses > initcalls like > the oth

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11

2000-09-28 Thread David Rees
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 09:39:22AM -0700, Dunlap, Randy wrote: > > Yes, that looks like 2.4.0-test9 now, except that it should > be done for ohci also, although you don't need it for your > config. Right, but it doesn't look like the usb-ohci driver uses initcalls like the other functions. I co

RE: Linux 2.2.18pre11

2000-09-28 Thread Dunlap, Randy
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > I'm getting this compile time error on 2.2.18pre11: > > > > > > > drivers/usb/usbdrv.o: In function `usb_init': > > > > drivers/usb/usbdrv.o(.text+0x6deb): undefined reference > to `uhci_init' > > > > > > The patch below should fix that. >

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11

2000-09-28 Thread David Rees
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 04:13:24AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > I'm getting this compile time error on 2.2.18pre11: > > > > > drivers/usb/usbdrv.o: In function `usb_init': > > > drivers/usb/usbdr

2.2.18 megaraid driver broken [was: Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11]

2000-09-28 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >2.2.18pre11 [..] >o Fix inia100/megaraid define clash (Arjan van de Ven) [..] The megaraid driver in 2.2.18 doesn't work with MegaRaid 434 cards. I've tried it on 2 different systems. Using 2.2.18pre11 with t

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11

2000-09-28 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I'm getting this compile time error on 2.2.18pre11: > > > drivers/usb/usbdrv.o: In function `usb_init': > > drivers/usb/usbdrv.o(.text+0x6deb): undefined reference to `uhci_init' > > The patch below s

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11

2000-09-28 Thread David Rees
Thanks, This does the trick. -Dave On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 09:23:29AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I'm getting this compile time error on 2.2.18pre11: > > > drivers/usb/usbdrv.o: In function `usb_init': > > drivers/usb/usbdrv.o(.text+0x6deb): u

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11

2000-09-28 Thread Arjan van de Ven
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > I'm getting this compile time error on 2.2.18pre11: > drivers/usb/usbdrv.o: In function `usb_init': > drivers/usb/usbdrv.o(.text+0x6deb): undefined reference to `uhci_init' The patch below should fix that. Greetings, Arjan van de Ven --- linux/dri

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre11

2000-09-28 Thread David Rees
I'm getting this compile time error on 2.2.18pre11: drivers/usb/usbdrv.o: In function `usb_init': drivers/usb/usbdrv.o(.text+0x6deb): undefined reference to `uhci_init' Complete .config is located at http://spoke.nols.com/~drees/config-2.2.18pre11 USB related config is below. -Dave # # USB sup

Linux 2.2.18pre11

2000-09-27 Thread Alan Cox
2.2.18pre11 o Kill bogus codec_id assignment (Linus Torvalds) o Update codec init code to handle id right (me) o Fix dead/clashing define for NFS(Trond Myklebust) o Remove the find_vga crap from bttv (me) o Fix retur