On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 04:03:09PM -0800, Tony Borras wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:50:10 +0200
> Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Tony,
> >
> > [ first, please always keep people in CC on LKML since it's
> > very easy to
> > miss a thread ]
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:10:58 +0200
"Jesper Juhl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > file: patch-2.4.34.3.bz2 has the corruption at line 213:
> > goto errout
> >
> > That is where that came from, when I patched my 2.4.34 to
> > arrive at 2.4.34.5, before applying the 2.4.35.rc5 patch!
> >
> That
On 19/07/07, Tony Borras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:50:10 +0200
Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> [ first, please always keep people in CC on LKML since it's
> very easy to
> miss a thread ]
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:23:57PM -0800, Tony Borras
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:50:10 +0200
Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> [ first, please always keep people in CC on LKML since it's
> very easy to
> miss a thread ]
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:23:57PM -0800, Tony Borras wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:20:06 +0200
> >
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:50:10 +0200
Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tony,
[ first, please always keep people in CC on LKML since it's
very easy to
miss a thread ]
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:23:57PM -0800, Tony Borras wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:20:06 +0200
Willy Tarreau
On 19/07/07, Tony Borras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:50:10 +0200
Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tony,
[ first, please always keep people in CC on LKML since it's
very easy to
miss a thread ]
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:23:57PM -0800, Tony Borras wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:10:58 +0200
Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
file: patch-2.4.34.3.bz2 has the corruption at line 213:
goto errout
That is where that came from, when I patched my 2.4.34 to
arrive at 2.4.34.5, before applying the 2.4.35.rc5 patch!
That sounds wrong. To the
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 04:03:09PM -0800, Tony Borras wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:50:10 +0200
Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tony,
[ first, please always keep people in CC on LKML since it's
very easy to
miss a thread ]
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:23:57PM -0800,
Hi Tony,
[ first, please always keep people in CC on LKML since it's very easy to
miss a thread ]
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:23:57PM -0800, Tony Borras wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:20:06 +0200
> Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > could you please report what the problem was, in
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:20:06 +0200
Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> could you please report what the problem was, in case it's not
> fixed yet ?
Ok, reproduced error at ./net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
line 436 changed label:
errout -> err_inval
then it builds fine!
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:20:06 +0200
Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 04:30:47PM -0800, Tony Borras wrote:
> > I did get the current 'pre' set of 2.4.35 (circa early
> > June) patches and applied to 2.4.34.5. After fixing a goto
> > mislable in one
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:20:06 +0200
Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tony,
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 04:30:47PM -0800, Tony Borras wrote:
I did get the current 'pre' set of 2.4.35 (circa early
June) patches and applied to 2.4.34.5. After fixing a goto
mislable in one of the
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:20:06 +0200
Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could you please report what the problem was, in case it's not
fixed yet ?
Ok, reproduced error at ./net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
line 436 changed label:
errout - err_inval
then it builds fine!
started
Hi Tony,
[ first, please always keep people in CC on LKML since it's very easy to
miss a thread ]
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:23:57PM -0800, Tony Borras wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:20:06 +0200
Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could you please report what the problem was, in case
Hi Tony,
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 04:30:47PM -0800, Tony Borras wrote:
> I did get the current 'pre' set of 2.4.35 (circa early
> June) patches and applied to 2.4.34.5. After fixing a goto
> mislable in one of the patches (dont remember if it was one of
> the patch-2.4.34.? or patch-2.4.35.pre5),
I did get the current 'pre' set of 2.4.35 (circa early
June) patches and applied to 2.4.34.5. After fixing a goto
mislable in one of the patches (dont remember if it was one of
the patch-2.4.34.? or patch-2.4.35.pre5), managed to build a
vmlinuz-2.4.35 successfully.
Just wondered whether to
I did get the current 'pre' set of 2.4.35 (circa early
June) patches and applied to 2.4.34.5. After fixing a goto
mislable in one of the patches (dont remember if it was one of
the patch-2.4.34.? or patch-2.4.35.pre5), managed to build a
vmlinuz-2.4.35 successfully.
Just wondered whether to
Hi Tony,
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 04:30:47PM -0800, Tony Borras wrote:
I did get the current 'pre' set of 2.4.35 (circa early
June) patches and applied to 2.4.34.5. After fixing a goto
mislable in one of the patches (dont remember if it was one of
the patch-2.4.34.? or patch-2.4.35.pre5),
18 matches
Mail list logo
