On 4/22/05, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- linux/kernel/power/swsusp.c~2005-04-22 17:07:56.0 +0200
> +++ linux/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2005-04-22 17:09:22.0 +0200
> @@ -1239,7 +1239,7 @@ static int check_sig(void)
> */
>error
Thank you.
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 08:20 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Freitag,
> 22. April 2005 03:20 schrieb Bob Gill:
> > OK. I downloaded, patched and started the build. Basically everything
> > stops when I get a "microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared" error
>
> Known problem. Fix
Pavel Machek wrote:
>> 1. Is it necessary to print the following message during regular boot?
>>swsusp: Suspend partition has wrong signature?
> Hmm, feel free to provide a patch. (I need something to try git on :-).
Attached (sorry, Thunderbird...). One may argue over KERN_ERR, but i
don't
Hi!
> > Nice, so I now have my own -git tree, with two changes in it...
> >
> > Is there way to say "git diff -r origin:" but dump it patch-by-patch
> > with some usable headers?
> >
> > [Looking at git export]
>
> Either Linus' demo git-export (NOT the same as git export!), or git
> patch. In
Thank you.
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 08:20 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Freitag,
22. April 2005 03:20 schrieb Bob Gill:
OK. I downloaded, patched and started the build. Basically everything
stops when I get a microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared error
Known problem. Fix in the
On 4/22/05, Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- linux/kernel/power/swsusp.c~2005-04-22 17:07:56.0 +0200
+++ linux/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2005-04-22 17:09:22.0 +0200
@@ -1239,7 +1239,7 @@ static int check_sig(void)
*/
error =
Hi!
Nice, so I now have my own -git tree, with two changes in it...
Is there way to say git diff -r origin: but dump it patch-by-patch
with some usable headers?
[Looking at git export]
Either Linus' demo git-export (NOT the same as git export!), or git
patch. In the latest tree,
Pavel Machek wrote:
1. Is it necessary to print the following message during regular boot?
swsusp: Suspend partition has wrong signature?
Hmm, feel free to provide a patch. (I need something to try git on :-).
Attached (sorry, Thunderbird...). One may argue over KERN_ERR, but i
don't mind.
Al Viro wrote:
> thread_info, part 1:
Patches look fine. Some of the helper stuff could be moved to
asm-generic, but that can still be done later. The headers really need
some serious cleanup in this area, the dependencies are damned fragile.
I8 still have a completely untested patch to
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Unfortunately first merge will make it practically unusable :-(.
No, quite the reverse. If I merge from you, and you use my commit ID as
the "base" point, it will work again.
But yes, if you actually send the result as _patches_ to me, then the
On Thursday 21 April 2005 02:59, you wrote:
Hello,
[build.log]
...
drivers/usb/storage/debug.c: In function `usb_stor_show_sense':
drivers/usb/storage/debug.c:166: warning: implicit declaration of function
`scsi_sense_key_string'
drivers/usb/storage/debug.c:166: warning: assignment makes pointer
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> You should put this into .git/remotes
>
> linus rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
>
Make that
Am Freitag, 22. April 2005 03:20 schrieb Bob Gill:
> OK. I downloaded, patched and started the build. Basically everything
> stops when I get a "microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared" error
Known problem. Fix in the pipeline.
Regards
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from
Am Freitag, 22. April 2005 03:20 schrieb Bob Gill:
OK. I downloaded, patched and started the build. Basically everything
stops when I get a microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared error
Known problem. Fix in the pipeline.
Regards
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
You should put this into .git/remotes
linus rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
Make that
On Thursday 21 April 2005 02:59, you wrote:
snip
Hello,
[build.log]
...
drivers/usb/storage/debug.c: In function `usb_stor_show_sense':
drivers/usb/storage/debug.c:166: warning: implicit declaration of function
`scsi_sense_key_string'
drivers/usb/storage/debug.c:166: warning: assignment makes
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
Unfortunately first merge will make it practically unusable :-(.
No, quite the reverse. If I merge from you, and you use my commit ID as
the base point, it will work again.
But yes, if you actually send the result as _patches_ to me, then the
Al Viro wrote:
thread_info, part 1:
Patches look fine. Some of the helper stuff could be moved to
asm-generic, but that can still be done later. The headers really need
some serious cleanup in this area, the dependencies are damned fragile.
I8 still have a completely untested patch to
OK. I downloaded, patched and started the build. Basically everything
stops when I get a "microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared" error
(the build keeps trying, but no modules get created).
I suspect others may have the same problem, but feel free to e-mail me
for more information (and
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 03:33:42PM +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
> Compile error on x86_64:
>
> CC [M] drivers/usb/image/microtek.o
> drivers/usb/image/microtek.c: In function `mts_scsi_abort':
> drivers/usb/image/microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared (first use
> in this function)
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 01:22:01AM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Hi!
Hi,
> > > > You should put this into .git/remotes
> > > >
> > > > linus
> > > > rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
> >
> >
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Is there way to say "git diff -r origin:" but dump it patch-by-patch
> with some usable headers?
In my git version there is a command called "git-export" for exactly this.
I don't know if Pasky included that in his trees, but if not, you can just
Hi!
> > > You should put this into .git/remotes
> > >
> > > linus
> > > rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
>
> (git addremote is preferred for that :-)
Nice, so I now have my own -git tree, with two changes in it...
Is there way to say "git diff -r
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Hi!
>
> It seems that someone should write "Kernel hacker's guide to
> git"... Documentation/git.txt seems like good place. I guess I'll do
> it.
I've also started writing
Hi!
It seems that someone should write "Kernel hacker's guide to
git"... Documentation/git.txt seems like good place. I guess I'll do
it.
> > just plain vanilla" without rm -rf?
>
> git cancel will give you "plain last commit". If you need plain vanilla,
> the "hard way" now is to just do
>
>
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> Are they new or were they in -rc2, too?
Some further backtracking:
The nic problem is already present in 2.6.12-rc1.
The pcmcia hang problem is not present in 2.6.12-rc1.
--
Andreas Steinmetz SPAMmers use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>>there's some problems with swsusp in 2.6.12-rc3 (x86_64):
>
>
> Are they new or were they in -rc2, too?
>
Fixed the rc2/rc3 IDE Oops myself today that prevented me to test rc2
earlier. It seems the IDE maintainer is currently not very responsive
and I didn't
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 09:00:09PM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Hi!
Hi,
> > > Well, not sure.
> > >
> > > I did
> > >
> > > git track linus
> > > git cancel
> > >
> > > but Makefile still contains -rc2. (Is "git cancel" right way
On 4/21/05, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Changes since 2.6.12-rc2:
>
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
...
> [PATCH] ppc32: Fix cpufreq problems
this depends on two patches in -mm:
add-suspend-method-to-cpufreq-core.patch
Add suspend method to cpufreq core
Hi!
> > > You should put this into .git/remotes
> > >
> > > linus
> > > rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
>
> (git addremote is preferred for that :-)
Oops :-).
> > Well, not sure.
> >
> > I did
> >
> > git track linus
> > git cancel
> >
> > but
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 06:57:23PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> thread_info part 3: heads.
headers, even...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
m68k thread_info - part 4
The rest:
a) added embedded thread_info [m68k processor.h]
b) added missing symbols in asm-offsets.c
c) task_thread_info() and freinds in asm-m68k/thread_info.h
d) made m68k thread_info.h included by m68k processor.h, not the
other
thread_info part 2:
encapsulates the rest of arch-dependent operations with thread_info access.
Two new helpers - setup_thread_info() and end_of_stack(). For normal
case the former consists of copying thread_info of parent to new thread_info
and the latter returns pointer immediately
thread_info, part 1:
new helper - task_thread_info(task). On platforms that have thread_info
allocated separately (i.e. in default case) it simply returns task->thread_info.
m68k wants (and for good reasons) to embed its thread_info into task_struct.
So it will (in later patch) have
Hi Pavel,
there's some problems with swsusp in 2.6.12-rc3 (x86_64):
1. Is it necessary to print the following message during regular boot?
swsusp: Suspend partition has wrong signature?
It is a bit annoying and I believe it will confuse some swsusp
users.
2. PCMCIA related hangs during
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 02:03:27PM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > You should put this into .git/remotes
> >
> > linus
> > rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
(git addremote is preferred for
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:10:15AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Jan Dittmer wrote:
> > Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Geert Uytterhoeven:
> > > [PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.11
> > > [PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.12-rc2
> >
> > Why do I still
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:19:10 +0200 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
| > It's available both as a patch (against 2.6.11) and as a tar-ball, and
| Where IS the tarball? Not on www.kernel.org, that's for sure.
in http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this
The following patch fixes the Oops though I don't know if this is the
correct solution.
--- linux-2.6.12-rc3/drivers/ide/ide.c.ast
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc3/drivers/ide/ide.c
@@ -2082,7 +2082,8 @@
static int ide_drive_remove(struct device * dev)
{
ide_drive_t * drive = container_of(dev
As already reported to lkml and IDE maintainer for 2.6.12-rc2:
Oops on 'cardctl eject' of an IDE flash disk (Pretec ATA Flash 16MB).
2.6.11.2 works fine.
System:
Linux (none) 2.6.12-rc3-gringo #1 Thu Apr 21 15:45:08 CEST 2005 x86_64
unknown unknown GNU/Linux
Kernel messages from startup to and
Compile error on x86_64:
CC [M] drivers/usb/image/microtek.o
drivers/usb/image/microtek.c: In function `mts_scsi_abort':
drivers/usb/image/microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared (first use
in this function)
drivers/usb/image/microtek.c:338: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
reported
> It's available both as a patch (against 2.6.11) and as a tar-ball, and
Where IS the tarball? Not on www.kernel.org, that's for sure.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrum) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 13:20 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > And for the crazy people, the git archive on kernel.org is up and running
> > under /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git. For the
> > adventurous of you, the name of the 2.6.12-rc3 release is a very nice and
> >
Hi!
> > And for the crazy people, the git archive on kernel.org is up and running
> > under /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git. For the
> > adventurous of you, the name of the 2.6.12-rc3 release is a very nice and
> > readable:
> >
> >
Hi!
> And for the crazy people, the git archive on kernel.org is up and running
> under /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git. For the
> adventurous of you, the name of the 2.6.12-rc3 release is a very nice and
> readable:
>
> a2755a80f40e5794ddc20e00f781af9d6320fafb
>
> and
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Jan Dittmer wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Geert Uytterhoeven:
> > [PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.11
> > [PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.12-rc2
>
> Why do I still get this error when trying to cross-compile for m68k?
Because to build m68k
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven:
> [PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.11
> [PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.12-rc2
Why do I still get this error when trying to cross-compile for m68k?
toolchain:
Reading specs from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> [PATCH] zfcp: convert to compat_ioctl
This does not seem to compile anymore with defconfig:
CC drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.o
/usr/src/ctest/rc/kernel/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c:63: warning:
initialization from incompatible pointer type
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 17:59 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> And for the crazy people, the git archive on kernel.org is up and running
> under /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git. For the
> adventurous of you, the name of the 2.6.12-rc3 release is a very nice and
> readable:
>
>
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 17:59 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
And for the crazy people, the git archive on kernel.org is up and running
under /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git. For the
adventurous of you, the name of the 2.6.12-rc3 release is a very nice and
readable:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[PATCH] zfcp: convert to compat_ioctl
This does not seem to compile anymore with defconfig:
CC drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.o
/usr/src/ctest/rc/kernel/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c:63: warning:
initialization from incompatible pointer type
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven:
[PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.11
[PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.12-rc2
Why do I still get this error when trying to cross-compile for m68k?
toolchain:
Reading specs from
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Jan Dittmer wrote:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven:
[PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.11
[PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.12-rc2
Why do I still get this error when trying to cross-compile for m68k?
Because to build m68k kernels, you
Hi!
And for the crazy people, the git archive on kernel.org is up and running
under /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git. For the
adventurous of you, the name of the 2.6.12-rc3 release is a very nice and
readable:
a2755a80f40e5794ddc20e00f781af9d6320fafb
and
Hi!
And for the crazy people, the git archive on kernel.org is up and running
under /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git. For the
adventurous of you, the name of the 2.6.12-rc3 release is a very nice and
readable:
a2755a80f40e5794ddc20e00f781af9d6320fafb
and
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 13:20 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
And for the crazy people, the git archive on kernel.org is up and running
under /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git. For the
adventurous of you, the name of the 2.6.12-rc3 release is a very nice and
readable:
It's available both as a patch (against 2.6.11) and as a tar-ball, and
Where IS the tarball? Not on www.kernel.org, that's for sure.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrum) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame
Compile error on x86_64:
CC [M] drivers/usb/image/microtek.o
drivers/usb/image/microtek.c: In function `mts_scsi_abort':
drivers/usb/image/microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared (first use
in this function)
drivers/usb/image/microtek.c:338: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
reported
As already reported to lkml and IDE maintainer for 2.6.12-rc2:
Oops on 'cardctl eject' of an IDE flash disk (Pretec ATA Flash 16MB).
2.6.11.2 works fine.
System:
Linux (none) 2.6.12-rc3-gringo #1 Thu Apr 21 15:45:08 CEST 2005 x86_64
unknown unknown GNU/Linux
Kernel messages from startup to and
The following patch fixes the Oops though I don't know if this is the
correct solution.
--- linux-2.6.12-rc3/drivers/ide/ide.c.ast
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc3/drivers/ide/ide.c
@@ -2082,7 +2082,8 @@
static int ide_drive_remove(struct device * dev)
{
ide_drive_t * drive = container_of(dev
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:19:10 +0200 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
| It's available both as a patch (against 2.6.11) and as a tar-ball, and
| Where IS the tarball? Not on www.kernel.org, that's for sure.
in http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 02:03:27PM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
You should put this into .git/remotes
linus
rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
(git addremote is preferred for that :-)
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:10:15AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Jan Dittmer wrote:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven:
[PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.11
[PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.12-rc2
Why do I still get this error
Hi Pavel,
there's some problems with swsusp in 2.6.12-rc3 (x86_64):
1. Is it necessary to print the following message during regular boot?
swsusp: Suspend partition has wrong signature?
It is a bit annoying and I believe it will confuse some swsusp
users.
2. PCMCIA related hangs during
thread_info, part 1:
new helper - task_thread_info(task). On platforms that have thread_info
allocated separately (i.e. in default case) it simply returns task-thread_info.
m68k wants (and for good reasons) to embed its thread_info into task_struct.
So it will (in later patch) have
thread_info part 2:
encapsulates the rest of arch-dependent operations with thread_info access.
Two new helpers - setup_thread_info() and end_of_stack(). For normal
case the former consists of copying thread_info of parent to new thread_info
and the latter returns pointer immediately
m68k thread_info - part 4
The rest:
a) added embedded thread_info [m68k processor.h]
b) added missing symbols in asm-offsets.c
c) task_thread_info() and freinds in asm-m68k/thread_info.h
d) made m68k thread_info.h included by m68k processor.h, not the
other
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 06:57:23PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
thread_info part 3: heads.
headers, even...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi!
You should put this into .git/remotes
linus
rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
(git addremote is preferred for that :-)
Oops :-).
Well, not sure.
I did
git track linus
git cancel
but Makefile still contains -rc2.
On 4/21/05, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changes since 2.6.12-rc2:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
...
[PATCH] ppc32: Fix cpufreq problems
this depends on two patches in -mm:
add-suspend-method-to-cpufreq-core.patch
Add suspend method to cpufreq core
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 09:00:09PM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Hi!
Hi,
Well, not sure.
I did
git track linus
git cancel
but Makefile still contains -rc2. (Is git cancel right way to check
out the tree?)
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
there's some problems with swsusp in 2.6.12-rc3 (x86_64):
Are they new or were they in -rc2, too?
Fixed the rc2/rc3 IDE Oops myself today that prevented me to test rc2
earlier. It seems the IDE maintainer is currently not very responsive
and I didn't have
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Are they new or were they in -rc2, too?
Some further backtracking:
The nic problem is already present in 2.6.12-rc1.
The pcmcia hang problem is not present in 2.6.12-rc1.
--
Andreas Steinmetz SPAMmers use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from
Hi!
It seems that someone should write Kernel hacker's guide to
git... Documentation/git.txt seems like good place. I guess I'll do
it.
just plain vanilla without rm -rf?
git cancel will give you plain last commit. If you need plain vanilla,
the hard way now is to just do
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Hi!
It seems that someone should write Kernel hacker's guide to
git... Documentation/git.txt seems like good place. I guess I'll do
it.
I've also started writing some
Hi!
You should put this into .git/remotes
linus
rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
(git addremote is preferred for that :-)
Nice, so I now have my own -git tree, with two changes in it...
Is there way to say git diff -r origin: but dump
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
Is there way to say git diff -r origin: but dump it patch-by-patch
with some usable headers?
In my git version there is a command called git-export for exactly this.
I don't know if Pasky included that in his trees, but if not, you can just
get my
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 01:22:01AM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that...
Hi!
Hi,
You should put this into .git/remotes
linus
rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
(git addremote is
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 03:33:42PM +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
Compile error on x86_64:
CC [M] drivers/usb/image/microtek.o
drivers/usb/image/microtek.c: In function `mts_scsi_abort':
drivers/usb/image/microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared (first use
in this function)
Patch to
OK. I downloaded, patched and started the build. Basically everything
stops when I get a microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared error
(the build keeps trying, but no modules get created).
I suspect others may have the same problem, but feel free to e-mail me
for more information (and you
Linux 2.6.12-rc3 is still missing the following compile fixes:
[PATCH] fix ultrastor.c compile error
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi=111391774018717=2
[PATCH] fix aic7xxx_osm.c compile failure (gcc 2.95.x only)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi=111391769011616=2
[linux-usb
Patrick McFarland wrote:
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:09 pm, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
Why is kb not used anymore? What happened?
Linus decided that keyboards are out, and voice activation is in. Remember to
use a high quality microphone!
Ohh _G_ Is that Why!? I thought it was cause
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:09 pm, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> Why is kb not used anymore? What happened?
Linus decided that keyboards are out, and voice activation is in. Remember to
use a high quality microphone!
--
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Computer games don't
Have a look through the mail archives and try "Bitkeeper and Linux" in
google, lets just say its been interesting.
--
James Purser
http://ksit.dynalias.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ok,
you know what the subject line means by now, but this release is a bit
different from the usual ones, for obvious reasons. It's the first in a
_long_ time that I've done without using BK, and it's the first one ever
that has been built up completely with "git".
It's
Ok,
you know what the subject line means by now, but this release is a bit
different from the usual ones, for obvious reasons. It's the first in a
_long_ time that I've done without using BK, and it's the first one ever
that has been built up completely with "git".
It's available both as a
Ok,
you know what the subject line means by now, but this release is a bit
different from the usual ones, for obvious reasons. It's the first in a
_long_ time that I've done without using BK, and it's the first one ever
that has been built up completely with git.
It's available both as a
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ok,
you know what the subject line means by now, but this release is a bit
different from the usual ones, for obvious reasons. It's the first in a
_long_ time that I've done without using BK, and it's the first one ever
that has been built up completely with git.
It's
Have a look through the mail archives and try Bitkeeper and Linux in
google, lets just say its been interesting.
--
James Purser
http://ksit.dynalias.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:09 pm, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
Why is kb not used anymore? What happened?
Linus decided that keyboards are out, and voice activation is in. Remember to
use a high quality microphone!
--
Patrick Diablo-D3 McFarland || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer games don't affect
Patrick McFarland wrote:
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:09 pm, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
Why is kb not used anymore? What happened?
Linus decided that keyboards are out, and voice activation is in. Remember to
use a high quality microphone!
Ohh _G_ Is that Why!? I thought it was cause
Linux 2.6.12-rc3 is still missing the following compile fixes:
[PATCH] fix ultrastor.c compile error
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsim=111391774018717w=2
[PATCH] fix aic7xxx_osm.c compile failure (gcc 2.95.x only)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsim=111391769011616w=2
[linux
92 matches
Mail list logo
