Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 13:39:45 +0100 Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 07:43:40AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:39:57PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:11:21 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:54 -0700

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-18 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Adrian Bunk napisał(a): > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:03:29PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >> On 16/03/07, Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> At Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:44:26 +0100, >>> Michal Piotrowski wrote: Takashi, unfortunately this bug isn't fixed

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-18 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 07:43:40AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:39:57PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:11:21 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I pushed out

[GIT PULL][RESEND] KVM updates for Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-18 Thread Avi Kivity
Linus, Please pull from the 'linus' branch of the git repository at git://kvm.qumranet.com/home/avi/kvm.git containing the following kvm stability and correctness fixes: Avi Kivity (4): KVM: Unset kvm_arch_ops if arch module loading failed KVM: Fix guest sysenter on vmx

[GIT PULL][RESEND] KVM updates for Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-18 Thread Avi Kivity
Linus, Please pull from the 'linus' branch of the git repository at git://kvm.qumranet.com/home/avi/kvm.git containing the following kvm stability and correctness fixes: Avi Kivity (4): KVM: Unset kvm_arch_ops if arch module loading failed KVM: Fix guest sysenter on vmx

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-18 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 07:43:40AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:39:57PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:11:21 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: I pushed out the -git trees

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-18 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Adrian Bunk napisał(a): On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:03:29PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: On 16/03/07, Takashi Iwai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:44:26 +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Takashi, unfortunately this bug isn't fixed

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 13:39:45 +0100 Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 07:43:40AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:39:57PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:11:21 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Linus

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:03:29PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > On 16/03/07, Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >At Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:44:26 +0100, > >Michal Piotrowski wrote: > >> > >> Takashi, unfortunately this bug isn't fixed > >>

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > Note that ping is handled in interrupt or softirq context. So something has > > locked up. Try without X? Or perhaps attack a serial console/netconsole, and > > when it hangs, use Sysrq to dump the process' states. > > I already did this >

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-17 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, Note that ping is handled in interrupt or softirq context. So something has locked up. Try without X? Or perhaps attack a serial console/netconsole, and when it hangs, use Sysrq to dump the process' states. I already did this

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:03:29PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: On 16/03/07, Takashi Iwai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:44:26 +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Takashi, unfortunately this bug isn't fixed

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:39:57PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:11:21 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > > > I pushed out the -git trees yesterday, but then got distracted, so the > > > patches and

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 17/03/07, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mar 16 2007 19:55, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >> > I've got *bad* news. Bug described here >> > http: //www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#0889 >> > http:

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Mar 16 2007 17:13, Chris Friesen wrote: > > This would seem to be a bug in the build system then. Or are you > supposed to "make clean" after every config change? No. When .config is changed, include/linux/config/ is updated, which causes things that depends on it one or the other way to

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Mar 16 2007 19:55, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >> > I've got *bad* news. Bug described here >> > http: //www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#0889 >> > http: //www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#1165 >> > probably leaked into mainline. >> > >> > Fsck! >>

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Chris Friesen
Randy Dunlap wrote: allmodconfig on i386: WARNING: "default_idle" [arch/i386/kernel/apm.ko] undefined! WARNING: "machine_real_restart" [arch/i386/kernel/apm.ko] undefined! make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1 make: *** [modules] Error 2 Please ignore. I think that this was the result of doing

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:11:21 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > I pushed out the -git trees yesterday, but then got distracted, so the > > patches and tar-balls and the announcement got delayed until this morning. > > Oops. I'm

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: > > I pushed out the -git trees yesterday, but then got distracted, so the > patches and tar-balls and the announcement got delayed until this morning. > Oops. I'm a scatter-brain. allmodconfig on i386: WARNING: "default_idle"

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 21:34 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, 16 March 2007 17:33, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > I pushed out the -git trees yesterday, but then got distracted, so the > > patches and tar-balls and the announcement got delayed until this morning. > > Oops. I'm a

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, 16 March 2007 17:33, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > I pushed out the -git trees yesterday, but then got distracted, so the > patches and tar-balls and the announcement got delayed until this morning. > Oops. I'm a scatter-brain. > > Anyway, the good news about -rc4 is that there's just

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 16/03/07, Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:44:26 +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Takashi, unfortunately this bug isn't fixed > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#1684 The patch wasn't merged to rc4. I know. I use patched

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 16/03/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:44:26 +0100 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got *bad* news. Bug described here > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#0889 >

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:44:26 +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Takashi, unfortunately this bug isn't fixed > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#1684 The patch wasn't merged to rc4. Or, do you mean the bug is still present even with the patch? Takashi - To

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:44:26 +0100 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got *bad* news. Bug described here > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#0889 > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#1165 > probably leaked into mainline.

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi, I've got *bad* news. Bug described here http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#0889 http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#1165 probably leaked into mainline. Fsck!

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:54 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Anyway, the good news about -rc4 is that there's just lots of random > fixes. I'm hoping that we've seriously cut down on the regression list, > and I'd ask everybody who is on Adrian's list to please re-verify their >

Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Linus Torvalds
softlockup seen during hardware access Linus Torvalds (3): Revert "USB: pxa2xx_udc: fix hardcoded irq number" Disable NMI watchdog by default properly Linux 2.6.21-rc4 Martin Schiller (1): USB: RTS/DTR signal patch for airprime driver Mathieu Desnoyers (1): [SPAR

Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Linus Torvalds
): Revert USB: pxa2xx_udc: fix hardcoded irq number Disable NMI watchdog by default properly Linux 2.6.21-rc4 Martin Schiller (1): USB: RTS/DTR signal patch for airprime driver Mathieu Desnoyers (1): [SPARC64]: Fix atomicity of TIF update in flush_thread() Max Dmitrichenko

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:54 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds wrote: Anyway, the good news about -rc4 is that there's just lots of random fixes. I'm hoping that we've seriously cut down on the regression list, and I'd ask everybody who is on Adrian's list to please re-verify their regression,

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi, I've got *bad* news. Bug described here http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#0889 http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#1165 probably leaked into mainline. Fsck!

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:44:26 +0100 Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got *bad* news. Bug described here http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#0889 http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#1165 probably leaked into mainline.

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:44:26 +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Takashi, unfortunately this bug isn't fixed http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#1684 The patch wasn't merged to rc4. Or, do you mean the bug is still present even with the patch? Takashi - To

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 16/03/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:44:26 +0100 Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got *bad* news. Bug described here http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#0889

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 16/03/07, Takashi Iwai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:44:26 +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Takashi, unfortunately this bug isn't fixed http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#1684 The patch wasn't merged to rc4. I know. I use patched

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, 16 March 2007 17:33, Linus Torvalds wrote: I pushed out the -git trees yesterday, but then got distracted, so the patches and tar-balls and the announcement got delayed until this morning. Oops. I'm a scatter-brain. Anyway, the good news about -rc4 is that there's just lots of

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 21:34 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Friday, 16 March 2007 17:33, Linus Torvalds wrote: I pushed out the -git trees yesterday, but then got distracted, so the patches and tar-balls and the announcement got delayed until this morning. Oops. I'm a scatter-brain.

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: I pushed out the -git trees yesterday, but then got distracted, so the patches and tar-balls and the announcement got delayed until this morning. Oops. I'm a scatter-brain. allmodconfig on i386: WARNING: default_idle

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:11:21 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: I pushed out the -git trees yesterday, but then got distracted, so the patches and tar-balls and the announcement got delayed until this morning. Oops. I'm a

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Chris Friesen
Randy Dunlap wrote: allmodconfig on i386: WARNING: default_idle [arch/i386/kernel/apm.ko] undefined! WARNING: machine_real_restart [arch/i386/kernel/apm.ko] undefined! make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1 make: *** [modules] Error 2 Please ignore. I think that this was the result of doing

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Mar 16 2007 19:55, Michal Piotrowski wrote: I've got *bad* news. Bug described here http: //www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#0889 http: //www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#1165 probably leaked into mainline. Fsck! fsck indeed. I

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Mar 16 2007 17:13, Chris Friesen wrote: This would seem to be a bug in the build system then. Or are you supposed to make clean after every config change? No. When .config is changed, include/linux/config/ is updated, which causes things that depends on it one or the other way to rebuild.

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 17/03/07, Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 16 2007 19:55, Michal Piotrowski wrote: I've got *bad* news. Bug described here http: //www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#0889 http: //www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0703.0/index.html#1165

Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4

2007-03-16 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:39:57PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:11:21 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: I pushed out the -git trees yesterday, but then got distracted, so the patches and tar-balls and