fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/linux-2.6.22.y/*
[remote "linux-2.6.23.y"]
url =
http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.23.y.git
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/linux-2.6.23.y/*
Which basically means I am cloning Linus' git and fetching st
/linux-2.6.22.y/*
[remote linux-2.6.23.y]
url =
http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.23.y.git
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/linux-2.6.23.y/*
Which basically means I am cloning Linus' git and fetching stable branches.
For linux-2.6.22.y it has been
Hi Rafael,
> Can you please check if you are able to reproduce the problem with
> 2.6.24-rc2?
I am not able to reproduce the problem with 2.6.24-rc2. I am able to
suspend
to disk successfully.
Thank for the prompt fix! :)
C.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Hi Rafael,
Can you please check if you are able to reproduce the problem with
2.6.24-rc2?
I am not able to reproduce the problem with 2.6.24-rc2. I am able to
suspend
to disk successfully.
Thank for the prompt fix! :)
C.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Tuesday, 30 of October 2007, CSights wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, I'll try to reproduce the problem here and fix it.
>
> No really, thank you!
Sorry for the long delay.
Can you please check if you are able to reproduce the problem with 2.6.24-rc2?
Thanks,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Tuesday, 30 of October 2007, CSights wrote:
Thanks, I'll try to reproduce the problem here and fix it.
No really, thank you!
Sorry for the long delay.
Can you please check if you are able to reproduce the problem with 2.6.24-rc2?
Thanks,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
>
> Thanks, I'll try to reproduce the problem here and fix it.
No really, thank you!
C.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
Thanks, I'll try to reproduce the problem here and fix it.
No really, thank you!
C.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
On Sunday, 28 October 2007 16:33, C Sights wrote:
> >
> > Well, a test program that triggers the SIGABRT under gdb would be useful.
>
> The attached program causes a SIGABRT for me,
>
> Thanks,
> C.
Thanks, I'll try to reproduce the problem here and fix it.
Greetings,
Rafael
-
To
>
> Well, a test program that triggers the SIGABRT under gdb would be useful.
The attached program causes a SIGABRT for me,
Thanks,
C.
#include
using namespace std;
int main (char **argv, int argc) {
string t = "linux rocks!";
t.replace(LONG_MAX, 1, "sigabrt here");
return 0;
}
Well, a test program that triggers the SIGABRT under gdb would be useful.
The attached program causes a SIGABRT for me,
Thanks,
C.
#include string
using namespace std;
int main (char **argv, int argc) {
string t = linux rocks!;
t.replace(LONG_MAX, 1, sigabrt here);
return 0;
}
On Sunday, 28 October 2007 16:33, C Sights wrote:
Well, a test program that triggers the SIGABRT under gdb would be useful.
The attached program causes a SIGABRT for me,
Thanks,
C.
Thanks, I'll try to reproduce the problem here and fix it.
Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 08:08:14AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 19:36 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 08:07:44PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:05 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> > > > On my openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 system running
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 19:36 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 08:07:44PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:05 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> > > On my openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 system running v2.6.24-rc1-281-g22d2aa1,
> > > I get the sysfs rename messages.
> >
> > Care
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 19:36 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 08:07:44PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:05 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
On my openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 system running v2.6.24-rc1-281-g22d2aa1,
I get the sysfs rename messages.
Care to try this?
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 08:08:14AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 19:36 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 08:07:44PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:05 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
On my openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 system running
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 08:07:44PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:05 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> > On my openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 system running v2.6.24-rc1-281-g22d2aa1,
> > I get the sysfs rename messages.
>
> Care to try this? Seems like a silly bug in the core if
>
On Friday, 26 October 2007 03:03, CSights wrote:
> Hi LKML,
> My computer running kernel 2.6.23 does not "hibernate" (suspend to disk
> using
> the kernel's methods) with a program (named stringTest) running in gdb, but
> has received a SIGABRT.
> The hibernate is successful when
Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:05 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
>> On my openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 system running v2.6.24-rc1-281-g22d2aa1,
>> I get the sysfs rename messages.
>
> Care to try this? Seems like a silly bug in the core if
> SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y. That's why we didn't catch this
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:05 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> On my openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 system running v2.6.24-rc1-281-g22d2aa1,
> I get the sysfs rename messages.
Care to try this? Seems like a silly bug in the core if
SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y. That's why we didn't catch this earlier, sorry.
Thanks a lot
On my openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 system running v2.6.24-rc1-281-g22d2aa1, I get the
sysfs rename messages.
Using Greg's patch, nothing changed. The log results are:
sysfs: duplicate filename 'eth1' can not be created
WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:424 sysfs_add_one()
Call Trace:
[]
On my openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 system running v2.6.24-rc1-281-g22d2aa1, I get the
sysfs rename messages.
Using Greg's patch, nothing changed. The log results are:
sysfs: duplicate filename 'eth1' can not be created
WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:424 sysfs_add_one()
Call Trace:
[802d1180]
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:05 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
On my openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 system running v2.6.24-rc1-281-g22d2aa1,
I get the sysfs rename messages.
Care to try this? Seems like a silly bug in the core if
SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y. That's why we didn't catch this earlier, sorry.
Thanks a lot
Kay Sievers wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:05 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
On my openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 system running v2.6.24-rc1-281-g22d2aa1,
I get the sysfs rename messages.
Care to try this? Seems like a silly bug in the core if
SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y. That's why we didn't catch this earlier,
On Friday, 26 October 2007 03:03, CSights wrote:
Hi LKML,
My computer running kernel 2.6.23 does not hibernate (suspend to disk
using
the kernel's methods) with a program (named stringTest) running in gdb, but
has received a SIGABRT.
The hibernate is successful when running
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 08:07:44PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:05 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
On my openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 system running v2.6.24-rc1-281-g22d2aa1,
I get the sysfs rename messages.
Care to try this? Seems like a silly bug in the core if
Hi LKML,
My computer running kernel 2.6.23 does not "hibernate" (suspend to disk
using
the kernel's methods) with a program (named stringTest) running in gdb, but
has received a SIGABRT.
The hibernate is successful when running kernel 2.6.22.7 !
Here is the message from gdb:
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 16:52 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:43:48PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:16:54PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 16:23 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:32:48PM -0700, David Miller
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 16:52 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:43:48PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:16:54PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 16:23 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:32:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
Hi LKML,
My computer running kernel 2.6.23 does not hibernate (suspend to disk
using
the kernel's methods) with a program (named stringTest) running in gdb, but
has received a SIGABRT.
The hibernate is successful when running kernel 2.6.22.7 !
Here is the message from gdb:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:43:48PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:16:54PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 16:23 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:32:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > > From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Date:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:16:54PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 16:23 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:32:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:37:30 -0700
> > >
> > > > Kay, are we doing
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:16:54PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 16:23 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:32:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:37:30 -0700
Kay, are we doing something wrong in
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:43:48PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:16:54PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 16:23 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:32:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Esben Stien wrote:
> [] input_unregister_device+0x67/0xfc
> [] hidinput_disconnect+0x2e/0x47
> [] hid_disconnect+0x76/0xce
> [] usb_unbind_interface+0x2d/0x6e
> [] __device_release_driver+0x71/0x8e
> [] device_release_driver+0x18/0x21
> [] bus_remove_device+0x70/0x80
>
I also saw this in 2.6.22-rt9. When I disconnect a USB device the
whole USB system goes down and I'm not able to insert any other USB
device until I reboot.
This happens every time. I'm on a P4.
usb 1-1.3: USB disconnect, address 11
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
* Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject: Document profile=sleep requiring CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
>
> profile=sleep only works if CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS is set. This patch notes
> the limitation in Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt and prints a
> warning at boot-time if profile=sleep is used
* Mel Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: Document profile=sleep requiring CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
profile=sleep only works if CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS is set. This patch notes
the limitation in Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt and prints a
warning at boot-time if profile=sleep is used
I also saw this in 2.6.22-rt9. When I disconnect a USB device the
whole USB system goes down and I'm not able to insert any other USB
device until I reboot.
This happens every time. I'm on a P4.
usb 1-1.3: USB disconnect, address 11
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Esben Stien wrote:
[c0319a64] input_unregister_device+0x67/0xfc
[c032a139] hidinput_disconnect+0x2e/0x47
[c032d697] hid_disconnect+0x76/0xce
[c02fd799] usb_unbind_interface+0x2d/0x6e
[c02b7ba4] __device_release_driver+0x71/0x8e
[c02b7c65]
On Wednesday, 17 October 2007 12:17, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On 10/17/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 23:36, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 22:50, Jens Axboe
On Wed, Oct 17 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17 2007, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On 10/16/07, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50,
On Wed, Oct 17 2007, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On 10/16/07, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at
On 10/16/07, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > >
On 10/17/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 23:36, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 22:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > On
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 16:23 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:32:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:37:30 -0700
> >
> > > Kay, are we doing something wrong in userspace when renaming wireless
> > > devices such that
On Wednesday, 17 October 2007 12:17, Kay Sievers wrote:
On 10/17/07, Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 23:36, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 22:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 10/17/07, Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 23:36, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 22:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 16:23 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:32:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:37:30 -0700
Kay, are we doing something wrong in userspace when renaming wireless
devices such that we can overlap
On 10/16/07, Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 17 2007, Kay Sievers wrote:
On 10/16/07, Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200,
On Wed, Oct 17 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17 2007, Kay Sievers wrote:
On 10/16/07, Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 23:36, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 22:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:32:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:37:30 -0700
>
> > Kay, are we doing something wrong in userspace when renaming wireless
> > devices such that we can overlap names?
>
> It does it for all network
From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:37:30 -0700
> Kay, are we doing something wrong in userspace when renaming wireless
> devices such that we can overlap names?
It does it for all network devices, I see this ugly message on every
single system I have from Fedora foo to
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:50:54PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 22:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 22:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > There are many traces like this in my
On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > There are many traces like this in my dmesg from 2.6.23-git3 (they don't
> > > appear for vanilla 2.6.23):
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > There are many traces like this in my dmesg from 2.6.23-git3 (they don't
> > > appear
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There are many traces like this in my dmesg from 2.6.23-git3 (they don't
> > appear for vanilla 2.6.23):
> >
> > <4>sysfs: duplicate filename 'ethxx1' can not be
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
There are many traces like this in my dmesg from 2.6.23-git3 (they don't
appear for vanilla 2.6.23):
4sysfs: duplicate filename 'ethxx1' can not be created
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
There are many traces like this in my dmesg from 2.6.23-git3 (they don't
appear for vanilla
On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
There are many traces like this in my dmesg from 2.6.23-git3 (they don't
appear for vanilla 2.6.23):
4sysfs:
On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
There are many traces like this in my dmesg from
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 22:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 22:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat,
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:50:54PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
From: Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:37:30 -0700
Kay, are we doing something wrong in userspace when renaming wireless
devices such that we can overlap names?
It does it for all network devices, I see this ugly message on every
single system I have from Fedora foo to RHEL
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:32:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:37:30 -0700
Kay, are we doing something wrong in userspace when renaming wireless
devices such that we can overlap names?
It does it for all network devices, I see
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 23:36, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 22:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On
On 10/14/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't notice that qemu was involved. Does qemu have an emulator for the
> gdth hardware?
>
I think no, the kernel just probe exist or not hardware, and hangs after that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are many traces like this in my dmesg from 2.6.23-git3 (they don't
> appear for vanilla 2.6.23):
>
> <4>sysfs: duplicate filename 'ethxx1' can not be created
> WARNING: at
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
There are many traces like this in my dmesg from 2.6.23-git3 (they don't
appear for vanilla 2.6.23):
4sysfs: duplicate filename 'ethxx1' can not be created
WARNING: at /home/rafael/src/linux-2.6/fs/sysfs/dir.c:425
On 10/14/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't notice that qemu was involved. Does qemu have an emulator for the
gdth hardware?
I think no, the kernel just probe exist or not hardware, and hangs after that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 12:21 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 22:45:47 +0400 "Dave Milter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I build linux-2.6.23-mm1 and try to boot it using qemu,
> > and it crashed with trace like this:
> > do_pa
Hi and thanks for your reply :)
On Friday 12 October 2007, you wrote:
> i have no quick ideas - the behavior you are seeing is quite unexpected.
> Could you try the current sched-devel code:
>
>
> http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/devel/sched-devel-combo-v2.6.23.patc
>h
Maybe I messed
(please don't top-post! edited...)
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:24:39 +0400 "Dave Milter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/14/07, Dave Milter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I build linux-2.6.23-mm1 and try to boot it using qemu,
> > and it crashed wi
t; to qemu options you can after that do:
gdb vmlinux
$target remote localhost:1234
$br gth_timeout
$continue
On 10/14/07, Dave Milter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I build linux-2.6.23-mm1 and try to boot it using qemu,
> and it crashed with trace like this:
> do_page_
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 22:45:47 +0400 "Dave Milter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I build linux-2.6.23-mm1 and try to boot it using qemu,
> and it crashed with trace like this:
> do_page_fault
> error_code
> lock_acquire
> _spin_lock_irqsave
> gdth_timeo
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 22:45:47 +0400 Dave Milter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I build linux-2.6.23-mm1 and try to boot it using qemu,
and it crashed with trace like this:
do_page_fault
error_code
lock_acquire
_spin_lock_irqsave
gdth_timeout
run_timer_softirq
__do_softirq
do_softirq
I have
can after that do:
gdb vmlinux
$target remote localhost:1234
$br gth_timeout
$continue
On 10/14/07, Dave Milter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I build linux-2.6.23-mm1 and try to boot it using qemu,
and it crashed with trace like this:
do_page_fault
error_code
lock_acquire
_spin_lock_irqsave
(please don't top-post! edited...)
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:24:39 +0400 Dave Milter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/14/07, Dave Milter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I build linux-2.6.23-mm1 and try to boot it using qemu,
and it crashed with trace like this:
do_page_fault
error_code
Hi and thanks for your reply :)
On Friday 12 October 2007, you wrote:
i have no quick ideas - the behavior you are seeing is quite unexpected.
Could you try the current sched-devel code:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/devel/sched-devel-combo-v2.6.23.patc
h
Maybe I messed something
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 12:21 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 22:45:47 +0400 Dave Milter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I build linux-2.6.23-mm1 and try to boot it using qemu,
and it crashed with trace like this:
do_page_fault
error_code
lock_acquire
_spin_lock_irqsave
Hi,
There are many traces like this in my dmesg from 2.6.23-git3 (they don't
appear for vanilla 2.6.23):
<4>sysfs: duplicate filename 'ethxx1' can not be created
WARNING: at /home/rafael/src/linux-2.6/fs/sysfs/dir.c:425 sysfs_add_one()
Call Trace:
[] sysfs_add_one+0x5c/0xc9
[]
Hi,
There are many traces like this in my dmesg from 2.6.23-git3 (they don't
appear for vanilla 2.6.23):
4sysfs: duplicate filename 'ethxx1' can not be created
WARNING: at /home/rafael/src/linux-2.6/fs/sysfs/dir.c:425 sysfs_add_one()
Call Trace:
[802d1532] sysfs_add_one+0x5c/0xc9
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
;) I think you snipped the important bit:
"the peak is terrible but it has virtually no dropoff and performs
better under load than the default 2.6.21 scheduler." (verbatim)
hm, i understood that peak remark to be in reference to
On Friday 12 October 2007 15:46, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ;) I think you snipped the important bit:
> >
> > "the peak is terrible but it has virtually no dropoff and performs
> > better under load than the default 2.6.21 scheduler." (verbatim)
>
> hm, i
* poison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also the transfer rate didn't degrade too much for copying directly
> from reiserfs to reiserfs and not using encfs:
>
> dd if=/mnt/.backup/2CpGkrxvz6wgA0b0xloz8PavzMLrMymOgi9 of=/mnt/.tdata/test
> 1033+0 records in
> 1033+0 records out
> 1083179008 bytes
* poison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also the transfer rate didn't degrade too much for copying directly
from reiserfs to reiserfs and not using encfs:
dd if=/mnt/.backup/2CpGkrxvz6wgA0b0xloz8PavzMLrMymOgi9 of=/mnt/.tdata/test
1033+0 records in
1033+0 records out
1083179008 bytes (1.1 GB)
On Friday 12 October 2007 15:46, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
;) I think you snipped the important bit:
the peak is terrible but it has virtually no dropoff and performs
better under load than the default 2.6.21 scheduler. (verbatim)
hm, i understood that
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
;) I think you snipped the important bit:
the peak is terrible but it has virtually no dropoff and performs
better under load than the default 2.6.21 scheduler. (verbatim)
hm, i understood that peak remark to be in reference to
* Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ;) I think you snipped the important bit:
>
> "the peak is terrible but it has virtually no dropoff and performs
> better under load than the default 2.6.21 scheduler." (verbatim)
hm, i understood that peak remark to be in reference to FreeBSD's
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 20:14, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Nicholas Miell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does CFS still generate the following sysbench graphs with 2.6.23, or
> > did that get fixed?
> >
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/linux-pgsql.png
> >
Hi =)
On Thursday 11 October 2007, Helmut Toplizer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I had similar behavior in the kernel releases since I can think of.
It doesn't happen before 2.6.23.
> (You may find some reports about at
> http://marc.info/?a=11350857446=1=2)
>
> Maybe your problem is similar.
>
> Here's
* Zhang, Yanmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ( Config is at http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config, system is Core2Duo
> > 1.83 GHz, mysql-5.0.45, glibc-2.6. Nothing fancy either in the config
> > nor in the setup - everything is pretty close to the defaults. )
>
> I used FedoraCore 8 Test2
Hi!
I had similar behavior in the kernel releases since I can think of.
(You may find some reports about at
http://marc.info/?a=11350857446=1=2)
Maybe your problem is similar.
Here's what have been found out:
Plugin of ehci devices causes some strange DMA thing
which causes delays because
Hi!
I had similar behavior in the kernel releases since I can think of.
(You may find some reports about at
http://marc.info/?a=11350857446r=1w=2)
Maybe your problem is similar.
Here's what have been found out:
Plugin of ehci devices causes some strange DMA thing
which causes delays because
1 - 100 of 597 matches
Mail list logo
